The Eunuch President

Americans Support A Public Option (Photo credit: Leader Nancy Pelosi)

Yep, I said that. The eunuch President. Not physically, not that the public knows anyway, but his negotiation style. And I really, truly wish he wasn’t and I didn’t feel the need to write this.

Look, his Obamacare is not much more than a requirement to have insurance if you drive a car. It DOESN’T cover everyone. It’s a gift to Big Pharma and the health insurance industry. True, they supposedly have to cover ‘everyone’, but they DO get all those additional premiums. When he negotiated for it, he never asked for the ‘Public Option‘, much less ‘Medicare for All‘ as a starting point. He wussed out from the start and STARTED from a weaker position and probably got a lesser deal than he might have had he started with the extreme position.

He wussed out on investigating the Bush administration for war crimes in violation of signed treaties.

He wussed out on investigating Wall Street for the 2008 Crisis.

He wussed out on charging HSBC with money laundering and dealing with Iran in violation of sanctions.

The first Debt Ceiling ‘crisis’ he never stood ground and dig in, he caved in and let the GOP acquire a  new Sword of Damocles to hang over his head.

The ‘Fiscal Cliff’?  Totally wussed. Caved on the tax. Let all types of breaks for corporations and the 1% get into the final bill and felt the need to offer cutting Social Security benefits as well.

He wussed out on financial reform and breaking up the big banks.

He wussed out on REALLY helping mortgage holder that are now underwater.

Should we expect President Obama to FINALLY  discover he has balls and stand his ground this time?  Doesn’t seem like it. He’s already undercutting his position by announcing ahead of time what he WON’T do. Someone please…PLEASE give this man some negotiating lessons……..QUICK!!!!! He states that he won’t use the 14th amendment.  Now Treasury and the Reserve have announced that they won’t consider the Platinum coin. And he expects the party that has blocked his every policy for most of 4 years to ‘do the right thing’. He CAN’T be serious, can he?  If he is, he may be smart, but as a negotiator, he’s a bloody fool.

Maybe the Eunuch in Chief can find his negotiating balls…..but if history is the guide….I sincerely doubt it.

Expect to watch another Presidential cave-in soon.

Bloody wuss.

Related articles

• *** Boehner’s Eunuchs (dakotatoday.typepad.com)
• Sarah Palin Calls Republicans Wusses and Socialists (bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com)

Pro-Life? Really?

Question: Have those that profess to be “Pro-Life” actually thought through what ACTUALLY being “Pro-Life” means? If you are concerned with the existence and well-being of a fetus, which is wholly dependent on the well-being of the mother to be carried to a term in a healthy form, are you REALLY prepared to think through what positions you may need to consider, and possibly change?

The health of the mother.  Many things to think through here.  A healthy pregnancy need a healthy mother so getting proper pre-natal care, good health care, proper dental care, a good diet, proper shelter and clothing, and a job paying a wage that would allow the mother to comfortably take care of herself during pregnancy.

Considering many single mothers don’t have many or all of those, perhaps supporting those government programs that provide them would be wise. Such as, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Welfare, Unemployment Insurance, affordable housing, raising the minimum wage to a living wage, parental leave…and many others are there to help BOTH the mother and the fetus.

Perhaps keeping single women from getting pregnant would be helpful. Supporting public education, jobs programs, family planning would work…and yes, your favorite, abstinence, would be included, but seriously, these days?

Of course all you “Pro-Lifers” have REALLY thought this through………..

Oh, yes.  There is also the matter of taking care of the child for at least 16 years…..

Have you REALLY thought this through?

 

Or are you just on a holy power trip, trying to control women, their bodies, and choices?

Related articles

• Ireland reminds us that “pro-life” can mean death to the mother (gloriabrame.typepad.com)
• Anti-abortion is not pro-life. (considertheteacosy.wordpress.com)
• Do “Pro-Life” Legislators and Advocates Really Want to Ban Abortion? (lawprofessors.typepad.com)
• Three Pro-Life Responses To Three Common Pro-Abortion Arguments (thedomesticmonk.wordpress.com)
• [quote] What it means to be pro-life: Remember Savita Halappanavar (slendermeans.wordpress.com)

America 2022 Time to act like a Nation…

In this world of global competition, it’s time to act like a single nation, not a loose confederation of separate nation states with each having different laws and standards. It just puts the NATION at a disadvantage. People today move too often. Business knows not state lines…or cares. Pitting states and people against each other might have worked well in the decades with slower transportation and communication and travel cross-country took weeks instead of hours, but not now.

In my opinion, the following NEED to be made NATIONAL laws and standards in order to get back into competition with China, India, Russia, etc..

Nationwide insurance regulations. No separate state regs, unless they are tougher than the national.

National Bar/Law standards. One license allows ANY lawyer to practice law in FEDERAL courts in the nation. States, of course, would have their own certification regarding the knowledge of state law, but it would be an additional certification, like pilots do for multi-engine planes and flying by instruments.

National Medical Licensing. One license allows a medical person to practice anywhere in the nation. With ‘Medicare for All”, this makes it easier for staff to be placed in areas of need quickly.

National Labor laws. One set of laws and regulations for the entire nation. Right to work and ‘work at will’ would be illegal. These only serve the interests of corporations, not the workers.

National voting laws. NO STATE would be allowed to change them. Period. This is supposed to be a representative democracy. ALL citizens NEED to vote for it to work well. Perhaps even fining people for NOT voting like Australia should be in place as well.

National school system. A national curriculum standard as well as teacher certification and requirements. This would allow more precise comparison between schools and teachers than the present mish-mash of regs, requirements, and curricula. It also cut costs by bulk purchasing of textbooks and major supplies. This I’ll get into deeper in a later post.

National commerce laws and regulations.

 

In our Pledge of Allegiance, we state that we are ‘one nation, under God, indivisible’. It’s time to act like one.

America 2022 Medicare for All

US residents with employer-based private health insurance, with self insurance, with Medicare or Medicaid or military health care and uninsured in Million; U.S. Census bureau: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Well…it’s the best way to advertise it. Medicare for All, if put in place, would necessarily be quite different from our current Medicare system.

Instead of a pay per service system, Medicare for All, for cost and implementation efficiencies , would be a service provider. Doctors and nurses, as well as all other health and health service workers would be government employees. Pay scale? To start, perhaps a scaled average of current incomes for each. After that, a results and service based bonus as well as a COLA.

How would a system be implemented quickly? How about making current state, county, and local health care systems the start for the national system? All those government bodies would probably love to get that cost off their shoulders. Also, VA hospitals would be folded into the system, but still be Veteran oriented more than public, tho they could be Trauma Centers in areas that lack one until one is built in that area.

Purchasing for all, including military needs would be consolidated for purchasing power with suppliers.

The Medicare tax would probably need to be increased…perhaps 14%: 7% for employees, 7% for employers. Still would probably less than current insurance costs. A 10% co-pay would also be put in, with a streamlined Medicaid system put in for those that cannot afford it.  It would also allow insurance companies to offer Medicare Supplemental Insurance.

To get doctors and nurses into the system, a 10 yr. employment option might be used. 5yrs. as a General Practitioner, then, if they plan to be a specialist, 5yrs. performing that specialty. In return, all their Medical school costs would be paid for. They would also get the current pay and be able to learn from more experienced professionals in the system.

It would cover all types of medical needs, mental health, vision, dental, etc..

Private hospitals could contract with Medicare to provide their hospitals for a fee, according to the hospital’s bed count, location, current equipment, and condition. A certain amount would be assigned for upgrades and remodeling costs.

Admittedly this is just a broad outline.  Such a system would need to be worked out between government, professionals, and providers, but it can and should be done. The least it would save is the 15% difference between current Medicare overhead costs and insurance company costs.

Of course, elective surgery would not be covered, but I’m sure insurance companies would come up with a policy to cover those eventually.

Doing this would finally bring America into the 21st century as well as joining the other industrialized nations.

Related articles

• Baby Boomers Short on Medicare Knowledge (momentumtoday.com)
• Paul Ryan’s Budget Plan: The Path To Prosperity. Question IS….Whose Prosperity? (theobamacrat.com)
• Poll: 83 Percent Of Americans Support Medicare Reform (thinkprogress.org)
• How To Choose Between Medigap And Advantage (theinsurancebarn.wordpress.com)
• Time to Shop for Medicare Plan F? (answers.iquote.com)

We’ll never contain healthcare costs the way we’re going….

Think about it. Insurance companies, drug companies, many hospitals, all hmo, ppos, doctors are all in it to make money…the more the better. Especially the publicly held companies. They need to show stockholders profits constantly. There is ONLY one way to get this entire mess under control and that’s single payer healthcare….or, “Medicare for all”.

In my mind, Medicare for all is a modified Medicare plan. It raises the amount it pays to 85% instead of 80%, it covers everything; vision, dental and mental, and provides bonuses to doctors for keeping their patients healthy. Current health insurers will be able to cover the other 15% and procedures that would be electives. Of course the current Medicare tax would need to be raised slightly, my best guess might be to 2.5% from 1.45% for employed and 4% from 2.9% for self-employed. Medicaid would still be provided for those that cannot afford the 15%.

It would fold in Part D and close the ‘doughnut hole‘ for drug coverage…and malpractice law will need to be re-examined and probably need caps on certain areas.

With everyone and everything covered by Medicare…and adding in the VA and Military…the Government would be able to put the brakes on the massive leaps in costs and provide a more reasonable increase, more in line with inflation than profit needs. It would allow bulk buys of drugs and equipment. Of course all state, county and city medical providers would be able to join in buying through the Medicare system and get the discounts as well.

If costs weren’t running wild, if companies weren’t so greedy, this proposal wouldn’t even be needed…but it is. It covers everyone and everything…should be set up to encourage preventive medicine, and provide areas with little or no providers with them.

But it makes too much sense….

Sidelined Buddah

Related articles

• Obama Administration Proposes Alignment Initiative for Medicaid and Medicare (insurance.zocdoc.com)
• Affordable Healthcare Act Saves Eight Years Of Medicare Trust Fund (medicalnewstoday.com)
• “HHS: Healthcare Reform Law Saves Medicare $120 Billion” and related posts (rocketnews.com)
• “Action Alert: Demand Pres. Obama Save Medicare” and related posts (healthcare-now.org)

Floods, Flood Insurance, Government, and The Tea Party

Here we go again. Every year we hear about flooding, many times in the same places. Why people insist in building on flood plains in the first place, much less the intelligence of rebuilding time and time again is beyond me. Perhaps the flood insurance program helps this foolishness. Maybe this is one government program that both Tea Party followers and others can agree is a total waste of government resources.

In my opinion, the ONLY people that should be building and getting government insurance in flood plains are crop producers. No residental areas, no business districts, no manufacturing or industry, not even livestock producers…just crop producers. They can gain advantages by using organic farming practices and the soil renewal flooding allows. Farmers on the Nile knew this before the time of the pharoes…the yearly floods renewed the soils along the river and allowed them to grow crops consistently on the same land without artificially improving the soil.

The ONLY flood insurance available in the U.S. is ONLY issued by FEMA through participating insurance providers. There is NO privately issued flood insurance. Insurance companies decided long ago that providing it cost them more than they could ever take in. The government decided in 1968 to provide flood insurance.

There is no reason to pay out damages more than one time in a flood plain. First time, mistakes happen. Not checking topography of an area near a river might not come to mind to people new to an area, but after the first time…it’s on the property owner to either decide to move…or put aside funds for their own rebuilding.

There are clues….  Seeing the land rise on either side of a river….living behind a levee…living downstream from a dam…there are clues…and there ARE publicly available flood plain maps that can be gotten as well. The view may be fantastic, but is it really worth risking life and finances to live there?

The ONLY government payment that should happen after a flood…is paying people to move away and save the yearly drain on government resources…rescues, infrastructure repairs, insurance payouts, levee repair and upkeep…first responder usage and risks to them.  It’s not worth doing this year after year. It’s good money after bad.

I feel bad that people lose things in floods, but after the first couple of floods, it’s time to cut losses and move.

Related Articles

• Things You Should Know About Flood Insurance (hkinsurance.wordpress.com)
• Cumbria floods cost insurers £200m (autonetinsurance.co.uk)