06
Jan
16

The Hypocracy of Wheaton College

Apparently the board at Wheaton College need to really examine what they are about to say with their firing of ‪#‎LaryciaHawkins‬ .

By using the ‘Statement of Faith’ to fire her for stating that Muslims and Christians pray to the same God as a reason to fire her, they are stating, by that action, that THERE IS MORE THAN ONE GOD.

Therefore, if they go through with the firing, they all should immediately resign for voiding their own pledge.

If there is only ‘one true God’, ALL religions celebrate THE SAME GOD. The only differences are the names and methods.

Seriously, they will be hypocritical if they fire #LaryciaHawkins for this reason and they really need to deeply examine what, exactly they mean by ‘faith’.

30
Oct
13

A Short Note on Fukushima Daiichi…

Illustration of post-accident state of 1-4 rea...

Illustration of post-accident state of 1-4 reactors, all but 2 display obvious damage to secondary containment (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This is getting silly. TEPCO and the Japanese government really need to stop stalling and get serious about this 40+ year problem.

Yes, 40+ years…by TEPCO’s own estimate on how long it will take to decommission the plant.

Estimate, mind you. It COULD take until the end of the century if things really get fouled up.

Right now there are areas that are not scheduled for starting PLANNING for decontamination for at least another 4 years. Add another year or two for planning and another 2-4 years for completion and you have close to another DECADE before residents can think about returning.

TEPCO and the Japanese government need to bite the bullet on these areas and purchase ALL land, businesses, and the contents that the residents have to leave and allow them to get on with their lives instead of being held in limbo waiting for news and decisions.

About the groundwater problem…again, TEPCO and the Japanese government need to stop looking for a ‘high tech’ answer and use what is already proven technology: BUILD A DAM/WALL COMPLETELY AROUND THE FACILITY 0.5KM FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. From bedrock to 20m above ground. All four sides, including out to sea 0.5km from shore, completely enclosing the facility and it’s port.

If you need to stop a flowing river of water, you use a dam. The Japanese already know how to build earthquake resistant dams and walls. Remember this is going to be a contaminated area well past 2054. This also provides a place to store contaminated material while a permanent facility is chosen.

Why 20m above ground?  3/11/11…that’s why. The plant is at risk from both, future earthquakes and tsunamis. The dam/wall provides added defense against another tsunami flooding the plant and washing the debris and contaminated water out to sea.

Yes…both suggestions are extremely costly, but so is leaving things as they are. More leaking tanks. More failed pipe joints. The possibility of another long term loss of power.

They won’t prevent another 3/11/11, but they CAN help to lessen the future effects of one.

22
Oct
13

About Federal Budgets…

United States deficit or surplus percentage 19...

United States deficit or surplus percentage 1901 to 2006 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Okay let’s get something straight right off the top. A national government’s budget has NO resemblance to either a family OR business budget. PERIOD. Yes, state, city, and county government budgets might be comparable, but NOT the federal. For several reasons.

First, the federal government can print money. It’s the ONLY organization that can.

Second, it’s the buyer of last resort. When the economy fails to create enough demand to get the nation out of a recession or depression, it’s up to the federal government to create that demand. In other words, if people cannot purchase enough goods to create the conditions needed for business to hire more employees, the government not only has the resources, but the implied duty to create the demand needed by federal projects.

Third, the conditions that are needed for the federal government to have a balanced budget is NOT dependent on cash flow like families, businesses, and lower governments, IT’S DEPENDANT ON FULL EMPLOYMENT (about 3%). If there is NOT full employment, the federal government not only should, but has an implied duty to run a deficit until full employment is attained.

I did say implied. Where? In the preamble to the Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You CANNOT do ANY of the prescribed items WITHOUT having a nation that is at or very near full employment…OR has a national debt that is created to fund ways to acquire full employment. If people desire a balanced federal budget, they need to create policy and projects to move the nation to full employment, NOT cut funding and federal jobs.
It runs counter to what those pundits and ‘experts’ are spouting, but it’s the way things are designed. The ONLY way to create a balanced budget…and possibly lower taxes…is to create the demand needed to start the cycle on an up curve.
Right now, the ONLY demand creator that has the ability to do so IS the federal government. THAT requires more spending and yes, MORE debt, NOT less in the short turn. It ALSO requires the wealthy to be taxed at a much higher rate FOR THE SHORT TERM. The tax code needs an overhaul to make it more progressive and close all of the loopholes for individuals and businesses.
It also requires politicians that work in the interest of the ENTIRE nation, not just those with money and apparent ‘power’. We need to stop crippling this nation but foolish, false economies and get back to things that work.
02
Oct
13

Why We Have The Governments We do.

Basically it’s our fault. Us. The voters…or more specifically the voters that do not vote.

Check out the percentage of eligible voters that actually have voted in elections. Most are below 50%.

Think. If 50% of the voters vote, that means that the winner was elected by only 25.1% of the eligible voters. One voter out of four.

In most primary elections it’s much lower. Like 20 to 40 percent vote. So candidates are picked by 10.1 to 20.1 percent of eligible voters. One in ten to 2 in ten.

And you wonder why there are so many really questionable people elected? Yes, money is a factor but it’s the VOTERS THAT ELECT PEOPLE, NOT MONEY.

If you REALLY are fed up and REALLY want a better local, state, or federal government…YOU NEED TO REGISTER AND VOTE…IN ALL ELECTIONS…THEY ARE ALL IMPORTANT.

If you REALLY think that 10% of the people REALLY know who the best person to make the laws and policies that affect ALL of us, then you deserve the governments you chose…and yes, not voting IS a choice. You CHOSE not to vote. You CHOSE to allow others to choose the people that make the laws that affect YOU as well as everyone else. Not voting is an abdication of responsibility, to the country, to the state, but more importantly…TO YOURSELF.

You chose to be silent in choosing YOUR representatives. You CHOSE to allow others to hire YOUR employee to run YOUR business, the governments, state, local, and federal.

Are you REALLY happy having people that only 25% of the electorate has chosen?

 

REALLY?

31
Aug
13

Update to Pres. Obama on Syria

English: President Barack Obama speaks to a jo...

English: President Barack Obama speaks to a joint session of Congress regarding his jobs plan, the American Jobs Act (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

President Obama,

Ok, as long as Congress decides to give you the authority, I’ll concede you the message strike on Syria. This decision to put it before Congress makes it a DEMOCRATIC decision. Thank you.

It also takes away the possibility of the House starting impeachment proceedings, which you KNOW they would do if you gave them that opening.

Thank you for also placing the decision to apply military force back where it constitutionally belongs…with Congress.

Whatever the result of the ‘message attack’, you did yourself proud by deciding to put the issue before Congress…as it should be.

Now if only Congress would be this concerned about jobs…….

30
Aug
13

Note to Pres. Obama about Syria…

Constitution of the United States, page 1

Constitution of the United States, page 1 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Mr. President,

I strongly suggest that you NOT attack Syria over chemical weapon usage. The reasons that have been given do not, in my opinion, exceed the reasons not to.

You say it’s a WORLD issue; where are the calls from around the world for something to be done?

You say it will send a message to Assad; why would a dictator in the midst of a civil war care what WE think. He’s fighting for survival.

You say it will make us safer. Really? What if Assad decides to aid terrorists BECAUSE we attacked and gives chemical weapons to them for them to use on attacks here?

What if Syria goes on a large scale cyber-attack on the U.S.? We haven’t stopped take-overs of Time, The New York Times websites, what happens when they decide to go after more critical systems?

You say you need to do this because of ‘preserving U.S. credibility in the world”. What about YOUR credibility as president as seen by YOUR supporters and the Nation?

Your oath is to ‘preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.’ Will this action even be constitutional if you do not call Congress to approve it. This is not an ‘immediate threat to the nation’. It is, as you state, a ‘punitive action to send a message’. The AUMF doesn’t cover that…nor does the War Powers Act.

Your predecessor decided to take unilateral action for WMD reasons. At least he went before Congress to get permission, ill-advised as it was.

An attack on ANY sovereign nation can be, and technically IS, an ACT OF WAR. PERIOD.

Is THIS why you didn’t investigate the Bush administration for possible war crimes as demanded by nations we have treaties with to PREVENT and go after war crimes?

And you whine about ‘upholding U.S. credibility over THIS?  Are you really willing to possibly give the House GOP a legitimate reason to bring up impeachment?

Perhaps this may aid you:

Shakespeare, in Henry IV, Part One, 1596:

Falstaff: ‘The better part of valour is discretion; in the which better part I have saved my life.’

It may be better to use discretion and pretend you never drew that ‘RED LINE’.

It’s not worth the headaches actually ‘sending a message’ would cause to save face over that policy.

01
Jun
13

Millennials, Women, Minorities, Progressives: Time to Get Busy

Ok, it’s still over a year before the 2014 elections and over 3 years until 2016, but you all need to get busy working to get YOUR nation under YOUR control. It’s not going to be easy. It’s not going to be quick. It’s going to take ALL of you to start to shape this nation into one you want.

Time to organize. Get priorities together. Meet with other organizations and find common ground. There may not be enough time to find YOUR candidates to run for offices, but you CAN find those that ARE running AND come close to what your vision is.

Personally, and it’s only my opinion, I’d vote Democratic, just because the Republicans have shown that they TRULY want to sell this nation to corporations and leave us as wage slaves. At least until YOU get organized and get YOUR candidates in position to run.

And run for EVERY  office you can. From dog-catcher to school board  to city council to mayor to state rep, to state senate, to governor, to representative, to senator…run candidates for EVERYTHING. IT ALL MATTERS.

You need to start building your ‘team’ so getting as many into ANY office is needed. You have to show the rest that your serious and are in it for the long haul.

If you don’t like what this nation is, it’s up to YOU to start to change it.

Vote, organize, protest, demonstrate, petition. MAKE THEM LISTEN. MAKE THEM PAY ATTENTION.

If they refuse, vote them out. Run to take their place.

They aren’t any smarter than anyone else. They have no special attributes. They’re just like you and me…except that they RAN FOR OFFICE.

This is the nation you and your children will inherit. I’m really sorry my generation and the one after mine (and yes, the ‘Greatest Generation‘ and those before it) haven’t been the best at running this nation.

But, most tried their best and it’s still salvageable. It can be one of the best, if not the best nation on earth, but…and it’s a really big BUT…YOU NEED TO TAKE ACTION AND START TO TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR FUTURES AND THE NATION’S FUTURE….NOW!

If you need info on starting to run for ANY office, this link has great info and is a good starting point: http://www.candidateproject.org/cms/academy/

Good luck. I’m really hopeful you all can do it…you ALL can change this nation into a nation of the PEOPLE again.

23
Apr
13

Let’s Stop This False “War on terror”

Why are we deluding ourselves that America is actually fighting a ‘declared’ war. The last declaration of war by Congress was June 4, 1942 against Romania.  ( http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_and_teasers/WarDeclarationsbyCongress.htm )

There hasn’t been a declared war since.  Korea was a UN peace action, the rest have been authorization for use of force measures, NOT war. I repeat WE ARE NOT AT WAR WITH ANYONE MUCH LESS A TACTIC CALLED ‘TERROR’. (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL31133.pdf )

The people of the United States have been sold a bill of goods in order to continue the flow of tax dollars to the military-industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about when he left office. IT’S ALL BULLSHIT !!!! PERIOD.

It’s time to DEMAND that ALL troops deployed under the current authorization for use of force be withdrawn and brought home. Why are we wasting tax dollars on something that can NEVER be won. You can’t ‘win’ when you’re fighting a tactic…an idea.

YOU CANNOT FIGHT A WAR AGAINST SOMETHING THAT IS NOT PHYSICAL AND EXISTS ONLY IN THOUGHT.

Try winning a war against air. Or fighting against meditation. That’s what we’re doing with this ‘war on terror‘.  As I stated, WE ARE NOT AND HAVE NEVER BEEN IN A DELCARED WAR.

What nation are we fighting?

If the United States is serious about wanting peace in the world, perhaps we should start by ceasing this idea of ‘winning’ against a tactic. The money we’re wasting can be better spent here at home. If those deficit hawks are serious about cutting spending, here is a prime target.

We also need to investigate those that got us into this mess…serious investigations by the Department of Justice. We’ve already violated several treaties by not investigating suspicions of torture and by holding people in Gitmo.

There ARE already courts that want to bring President Bush in for war crime trials. Why aren’t we at least INVESTIGATING?   (http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/12/bush-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-absentia/ ) ( http://www.uswarcrimes.com/?page_id=54 ) (http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/bush_and_blair_found_guilty_of_war_crimes_for_iraq_attack/ )

At the very least, stop the insane fear mongering and end this stupid, wasteful, unwinnable action in Afghanistan.

 

21
Apr
13

Terror Attack..or Acting Out

Looking at what we know about the marathon bombers, I personally feel that it wasn’t ‘terrorism‘ as it is commonly thought of. It’s more of a last ditch act to make a name for himself.

This wasn’t a ‘group’, it was basically individual. It wasn’t political, it was lashing out.

Look at what his parents have said the older brother told his parents:  he’s a success; boxing champ; well respected and influential. He drove a Mercedes but seemingly was unemployed. They had to rob to get money to try to escape. His Facebook page says that he didn’t understand Americans…he had no friends. He was looking for attention, to be important, nothing political until after his trip to Russia. Why the ‘radical Islamist‘ Utube? Wanting attention, he probably was drawn to it and told that ‘terrorism’ was an easy way to get it and get back at those that couldn’t see his greatness, that wouldn’t ‘accept’ him, that he didn’t understand.

The younger brother, on the other hand, seeming fit in quite well in America. He had friends. He was accepted. He was liked. He was ‘successful’. Everything his big brother wasn’t but wanted dearly, he had.  He also was living alone with his brother in an apartment, dependent on him to feed, clothe and shelter him while he attended college. He got his citizenship before his brother. Apparently, he was quite happy with his situation while his brother wasn’t.

He didn’t talk about his parents or want friends over because his parents weren’t there. He didn’t talk about his brother, even though he looked up to him because he might have felt uneasy about him and his state of mind.

My thought is that he reluctantly followed his brother’s lead because of family loyalty and feeling of obligation because he was reliant on him. According to statements, the younger seemed to look up to the older ‘following him around like a puppy dog‘. Watch that often replayed video of both walking down the street just before the bombing. My feeling about what it shows is that the younger really isn’t comfy with what is going down. He’s walking 5-10 feet behind his brother, like he doesn’t want to  be associated with his plan, but feels the obligation and follows reluctantly.

At the first firefight, his big brother strapped a device to him and rushed the police like a ‘true believer’ would. The younger turned and tried to escape, running over his brother, actually turning the vehicle around to do so. Was it to drive into the police to do damage, or was it a final lashing out at his big brother for getting him into this situation. In the end, the final ‘firefight’ might be more of a scared young man, realizing what will and might happen when he’s captured than one of a ‘true believer’.

He was no ‘true believer’ or else he’d have been dead along side his brother. He was a younger, loving brother that felt an obligation to his brother, no matter how misguided. Family values. Loyalty to family…..

Yes, the younger needs to be tried and serve time, but personally, I feel that sentencing should include being seen by anti-cult experts and see if he can be ‘reprogrammed’. If so, perhaps a lighter sentence and detention in a low or mid security prison and giving him educational opportunities might result in reclaiming a smart, young man and return him to his previous path of being a citizen. He’s more brainwashed by his brother than angry at America. He’s smart. If his friends don’t desert him, I feel he could be a productive American after serving a 10-15 yr. sentence.

We shouldn’t be tossing away lives, his or others in prison.

After all, we DO still believe in rehabilitation of people, don’t we?

21
Jan
13

Martin Luther King Jr……Only a memory?

45 yrs. after his assassination, has MLK become nothing more than a memory?

State legislatures are passing new voting laws to restrict voting, especially among the poor and minorities.

State legislatures are passing new laws taking away hard won labor gains and driving unions into non-existence,

State legislatures are passing laws that restrict women from their ability to choose for themselves in matters of pregnancy and health.

Federal government has passed laws stripping away Constitutional rights in the name of ‘national security‘ and ‘public welfare‘.

Federal tax law favors the wealthy over the poor and middle class.

State legislatures are passing ‘right to work‘ laws that protect the employers.

State legislatures are passing ‘work at will’ laws that allow employers to fire employees on a wim.

Have things improved since his death?

Has poverty gone down?

Are less people in jail?

Are more people working a 40 hr. work week at a living wage?

Are public schools getting the support and funding they need?

Has Martin Luther King’s legacy turned into nothing more than a memory and a holiday?

 

13
Jan
13

The Eunuch President

Americans Support A Public Option

Americans Support A Public Option (Photo credit: Leader Nancy Pelosi)

Yep, I said that. The eunuch President. Not physically, not that the public knows anyway, but his negotiation style. And I really, truly wish he wasn’t and I didn’t feel the need to write this.

Look, his Obamacare is not much more than a requirement to have insurance if you drive a car. It DOESN’T cover everyone. It’s a gift to Big Pharma and the health insurance industry. True, they supposedly have to cover ‘everyone’, but they DO get all those additional premiums. When he negotiated for it, he never asked for the ‘Public Option‘, much less ‘Medicare for All‘ as a starting point. He wussed out from the start and STARTED from a weaker position and probably got a lesser deal than he might have had he started with the extreme position.

He wussed out on investigating the Bush administration for war crimes in violation of signed treaties.

He wussed out on investigating Wall Street for the 2008 Crisis.

He wussed out on charging HSBC with money laundering and dealing with Iran in violation of sanctions.

The first Debt Ceiling ‘crisis’ he never stood ground and dig in, he caved in and let the GOP acquire a  new Sword of Damocles to hang over his head.

The ‘Fiscal Cliff’?  Totally wussed. Caved on the tax. Let all types of breaks for corporations and the 1% get into the final bill and felt the need to offer cutting Social Security benefits as well.

He wussed out on financial reform and breaking up the big banks.

He wussed out on REALLY helping mortgage holder that are now underwater.

Should we expect President Obama to FINALLY  discover he has balls and stand his ground this time?  Doesn’t seem like it. He’s already undercutting his position by announcing ahead of time what he WON’T do. Someone please…PLEASE give this man some negotiating lessons……..QUICK!!!!! He states that he won’t use the 14th amendment.  Now Treasury and the Reserve have announced that they won’t consider the Platinum coin. And he expects the party that has blocked his every policy for most of 4 years to ‘do the right thing’. He CAN’T be serious, can he?  If he is, he may be smart, but as a negotiator, he’s a bloody fool.

Maybe the Eunuch in Chief can find his negotiating balls…..but if history is the guide….I sincerely doubt it.

Expect to watch another Presidential cave-in soon.

Bloody wuss.

11
Jan
13

Pro-Life? Really?

Question: Have those that profess to be “Pro-Life” actually thought through what ACTUALLY being “Pro-Life” means? If you are concerned with the existence and well-being of a fetus, which is wholly dependent on the well-being of the mother to be carried to a term in a healthy form, are you REALLY prepared to think through what positions you may need to consider, and possibly change?

The health of the mother.  Many things to think through here.  A healthy pregnancy need a healthy mother so getting proper pre-natal care, good health care, proper dental care, a good diet, proper shelter and clothing, and a job paying a wage that would allow the mother to comfortably take care of herself during pregnancy.

Considering many single mothers don’t have many or all of those, perhaps supporting those government programs that provide them would be wise. Such as, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Welfare, Unemployment Insurance, affordable housing, raising the minimum wage to a living wage, parental leave…and many others are there to help BOTH the mother and the fetus.

Perhaps keeping single women from getting pregnant would be helpful. Supporting public education, jobs programs, family planning would work…and yes, your favorite, abstinence, would be included, but seriously, these days?

Of course all you “Pro-Lifers” have REALLY thought this through………..

Oh, yes.  There is also the matter of taking care of the child for at least 16 years…..

Have you REALLY thought this through?

 

Or are you just on a holy power trip, trying to control women, their bodies, and choices?

16
Oct
12

U.S. Jobs, the Military, and a no/low-cost idea for both that INCREASES U.S. Security.

The U.S. military has been an all-volunteer fo...

The U.S. military has been an all-volunteer force since the end of the Vietnam War but male U.S. citizens and non-citizens are still required to register for the military draft within 30 days of their 18th birthday. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Ok. We spend billions for the military. The military purchases billions of food, clothing, medicine, supplies, and equipment of all kinds. We need good paying US jobs. We need more manufacturing. We need national security.

This program should take care of a lot of the above.

REQUIRE ALL MILITARY PURCHASES TO BE MANUFACTURED IN THE U.S….BY U.S. CITIZEN OWNED COMPANIES…WITH FACTORIES IN THE U.S…USING U.S, WORKERS…USING 99.9% U.S, MADE PARTS…DESIGNED BY 100% U.S.CITIZEN OWNED DESIGN FIRMS…USING 99.9% U.S. MADE PARTS…USING 100% U.S. RESOURCES.

If there is a major war, there is a real possibility that the military would not be able to get any parts source from oversea ‘partners’. It’s U.S. taxpayers paying for the military and it’s equipment and supplies. It should be U.S. citizens MAKING AND SUPPLYING the military and getting the benefits of the spending, NOT oversea companies and their workers.

It’s a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY DAMN IT !!!

Not only would it provide a secure supply line for the military, it would also boost the U.S. economy, both manufacturing and farm. More cotton, wool production. More apparel factories.  More manufacturing. More mining. More shipping.

It’s there.  It’s OUR MONEY. SPEND IT HERE!

 

09
Oct
12

Debate…Don’t sleepwalk

English: Kennedy brothers; left to right John,...

English: Kennedy brothers; left to right John, Robert, Ted. Česky: Bratři Kennedyové – vlevo John F., uprostřed Robert F. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Sheesh. “I’m fighting for the middle class”.  Where? Not at that first debate. Spouting bullet points?  Check. Fighting for the middle class?  Nope.

Romney states a falsehood.  Spout pre-chosen bullet point.

Romney stretches the facts. Spout another bullet point.

Romney comes out energized. Obama looks like he just woke up and couldn’t care less.

DAMN IT!!! IF YOU SAY YOU’RE FIGHTING FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS….FIGHT!!  DON’T BLOODY SLEEPWALK!

Counter Romney’s statements. Make him explain and specify his points, don’ t just let them slide by.

Geeze…and you say you’re from Chicago…CHICAGO!!!!  WHERE POLITICS IS THE CITY SPORT.  Richard J. Daley is rolling in his grave at Obama’s performance.

No passion….no fight….just law professor in front of class…and bored with it as well.

Damn it, if you want people to get passionate about re-electing you, if you want people to be excited about voting for you…. SHOW SOME EXCITEMENT AND PASSION YOURSELF…..WHEN IT COUNTS.  WHEN A LARGE AUDIENCE IS VIEWING.

If Obama loses, it will be because of this…his lack of visible passion, lack of visible fight.

The first debate, he showed none, just a milquetoast professor spouting his prepared lesson plan.

Lord, I miss Democrats like Richard J. Daley, Ted Kennedy, Tip O’ Neil, Bobby Kennedy, FDR.  Passionate to a fault, but you always felt they’d fight to the end of the earth for the common people.

Now…..just wimpy wusses that spout bi-partisan drivel even after 3 years of GOP blocking all of his policies.

 

Barack….find your fight and backbone quick…..and keep it for the next 5 years. If you win and get a Democratic House and Senate, you will need to show the middle class you can act as well as give great speeches. You need to listen to the Progressive side this time. The nation’s situation demands large, Progressive action to get the economy back. You say you’ve studied FDR….try using his actions.

16
Sep
12

Strikes, Education, and Why You Don’t Try To Fix What Isn’t Broken

All the clamor over the CTU strike has gotten me thinking about ‘education reform’. I’m a product of the Chicago Public Schools and Chicago Catholic Schools. I’ve been in both. Both were good at educating. What happened to the CPS?

Reform.

Reforming education isn’t new. It really got started in the ’70’s…you know when African-American children started to become the majority in some schools that were once all or mostly white. Redlining and white flight in the late 60’s and early 70’s set the table for ‘reforms’. Reforms in a school system that was doing a pretty good job up until then.

Why?

Perhaps it’s the pervasive undercurrent of the national illness of racism. Rather than making efforts and providing resources to a poorer community, politicians try to hide their slowly cutting funds to poorer schools by instituting ‘reforms’. “We need to help those with less intelligence and motivation to educate themselves to our level”  Yes, it’s not a nice statement, but in that era, it was underlying much of the politics…especially in Chicago.

Since I was a student, Phys Ed has been cut. So has music, art, recess, lunch, languages and extra-curricular activities. When I attended Harper High in the early 70’s, a mostly African-American filled school, the rot was already starting. The school’s pool was filthy. Equipment was getting scarce in the science labs. Books were starting to become rarer.

When I transferred to Hubbard, it was a different scene. Well cared for, equipped, clean pool, lab supplies, wood, metal, and auto shops, a computer lab, and decent books. There was a difference. Still, there weren’t that many complaint about the education kids were getting.

Then ‘reformers’ started.  Took out phonics. Added new math. Then they started stripping the humanities out.  Art…not needed. Music….too costly. Recess is a waste of time as is an hour for lunch. Supplies?  When we feel like getting them to you. Text books?  Kids just wreck them so maybe we’ll get more someday.

And parents were no help either. Where were the PTAs? And the truant officers?  Cut to provide more ‘in-school security forces’. After school activities.  Cut. I remember the most fun I had was at the after-school activities in the school.

Why are kids on the street after school?   Hmmmmm….

School buildings went without maintenance for years. New additions to older schools took away playgrounds.

Now it’s teaching to standard tests. No thinking, just rote learning. Just the way those in power like their constituents.

No critical thinking ability to be able to question what they are telling you.

No culture to inspire you to better lives.

No ability to research information to counter their falsehoods and deceptions.

Oh.  Charter Schools?  Corporate take over of the public education. Feeding on your tax dollars promising a ‘better’ education by getting more funding per student to offer what was stripped out of the public schools…art, music, phonics.

And putting the control of schools in the hands of principals and the neighborhood? Ever hear of  “divided we fall”?  You’re not educating your children to stay in the neighborhood are you? You do want them to succeed in the world, right?

We don’t need ‘local control’, we need a national school system that sets a minimum standard for the nation, sets minimum curriculum standards and teaching, provides a national teacher standard, license, and evaluation, provides a basic school building design and requirements, provides 4 different texts for all subjects to schools, and provides for 55% of the cost of the system from day care thru a bachelor degree.  Yes, free public education from day care to the 4th year of college.

We’re one nation. We’re a nation that constantly moves. We need to provide an educational system that a student can slip right in when they need to transfer. We also need a national full year school calender. My preference is to one similar to Japan’s, but there is always discussion to be done.

And yes, this means tax reform as well, but that’s another post.

Sidelined Buddah

 

 

 

13
Jun
12

America 2022 Time to act like a Nation…

In this world of global competition, it’s time to act like a single nation, not a loose confederation of separate nation states with each having different laws and standards. It just puts the NATION at a disadvantage. People today move too often. Business knows not state lines…or cares. Pitting states and people against each other might have worked well in the decades with slower transportation and communication and travel cross-country took weeks instead of hours, but not now.

In my opinion, the following NEED to be made NATIONAL laws and standards in order to get back into competition with China, India, Russia, etc..

Nationwide insurance regulations. No separate state regs, unless they are tougher than the national.

National Bar/Law standards. One license allows ANY lawyer to practice law in FEDERAL courts in the nation. States, of course, would have their own certification regarding the knowledge of state law, but it would be an additional certification, like pilots do for multi-engine planes and flying by instruments.

National Medical Licensing. One license allows a medical person to practice anywhere in the nation. With ‘Medicare for All”, this makes it easier for staff to be placed in areas of need quickly.

National Labor laws. One set of laws and regulations for the entire nation. Right to work and ‘work at will’ would be illegal. These only serve the interests of corporations, not the workers.

National voting laws. NO STATE would be allowed to change them. Period. This is supposed to be a representative democracy. ALL citizens NEED to vote for it to work well. Perhaps even fining people for NOT voting like Australia should be in place as well.

National school system. A national curriculum standard as well as teacher certification and requirements. This would allow more precise comparison between schools and teachers than the present mish-mash of regs, requirements, and curricula. It also cut costs by bulk purchasing of textbooks and major supplies. This I’ll get into deeper in a later post.

National commerce laws and regulations.

 

In our Pledge of Allegiance, we state that we are ‘one nation, under God, indivisible’. It’s time to act like one.

12
Jun
12

America 2022 Energy

Smart Grids

Smart Grids (Photo credit: GDS Infographics)

Ok, we need an Energy Policy. Haven’t had one in years. Here’s my non-expert, normal (well, I think I am… ; P ) person, opinion on what it should be.

1) Get off nuclear power. The costs are too high. If Lloyd’s won’t insure it, and only the government will, how safe is it, exactly? Look at Japan. …And yes it can happen here. Three Mile Island ring a bell. Not to mention that the west coast is overdue for large quakes all up and down the entire length. And the east coast and the rest of the nation aren’t secure either. Faults abound all along the east coast, just not on a plate meeting, but there nonetheless. New Madrid in the midwest is always a threat to explode, and there are the spring and summer floods as well as winter ice storms. Not to mention…we STILL haven’t decided on what to do with tons of used fuel that will stay dangerous for thousands of years.

It ain’t worth it.

2) Renewables. Now. All of them. Wind…and yes, we do need to work on making it safer for birds. No reason it can’t be made so. Solar. Thousands of rooftops. Acres of desert. All places to generate solar power. Hydro. Tide generators hold promise…again creature safety needs to be worked on. Mini-hydro generators that can be placed in river and stream currents are getting better. Perhaps even eliminating dams that are there just for power and using current generators might be possible soon. Thermal. West coast holds possibilities for large generation, and for individuals,  home thermal plants that use ground temperature to heat and cool.

3) Hydrogen fuel cells. They are getting better and safer and could be a solution for things that can’t use the others because of limitations.

4) Bridge fuels/plan.  Move the nation towards greener energy by requiring better efficiency, hybrids, etc.. And not gas dependent.  LPG/Electric. LPG/Hydrogen. LPG. Not the end points, but a bridge to  all electric/fuel cell transportation. Again, this needs to be required by government. If the current fuel providers won’t upgrade their stations, the government must open it’s own alternate fuel network. It’s too important to the national security to let the old fuels set the pace.

5) Build the nationwide Smart Grid. And yes, again it needs to be required by the government and if the current providers can’t, the government must. In fact, it may be better in the long run to have the government build the entire grid and lease it to providers. It should be. Electricity is too important to the nation to be left with many different systems and various states of repair. It also allows the government to control the cyber-security of the entire grid.

Just my thoughts.

13
May
12

America 2022 A short break….and a reminder

The inscription, which reads, in part: "D...

The inscription, which reads, in part: “Dedicated to you, a free citizen in a free land …. In standing before this symbol, you have the opportunity to dedicate yourself, as did our founding fathers, to the principles of the individual freedom for which our nation stands.” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As I stated when I started America 2022, this is just my thoughts on what I think should be done to move America towards a new, better future. There have been things that happened and were developed in the past 236 years that the Founding Fathers never could have foreseen. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights was their solution to getting the former colonies to agree to work as one.

Transportation and communication took days, weeks, even months to get news, people and products from place to place. Decentralized government made sense at that time. Today, when crossing the entire nation can be done in a few hours and people know things almost as the happen, the needs lessens.

Our nation is mote mobile. People travel and move with relative ease. Products move across the nation in hours and days instead of weeks and months. Business is transacted across the nation now as easily as it was across the street then. There are certain things that should be standardized throughout the nation to ease commerce and the flow of people. Those will be the objects of future posts, as well as taxes and other subjects.

 

As for this coming election…

IT MATTERS.  ALL ELECTIONS MATTER.

If you are dissatisfied by the government we have now, there is a solution but it ain’t easy.  It takes work and possibly personal commitment.

You need to organize and vote.  Vote for those that share most of your views and values.  If there aren’t any, think about running or office yourself, especially if you’re young.

Occupy is a great start, but it lacks power, the power the Tea Party uses to get their views into government.  As much as it may be distasteful, the best way to make change you want happen in government, is to become part of it and work from the inside.

The President can’t make laws. Congress makes laws. Congress holds the purse strings. Congress selects Supreme Court justices. Congress declares and ends wars. Congress finances schools. Congress finances infrastructure. Congress regulates big business, Wall Street, and big banks. Congress raises and lowers taxes. Congress says what gets funded and what doesn’t.

Re-electing President Obama is all well and good, but he can’t do squat unless he also has a Congress that will pass his policy. Otherwise it’s more of the same if it’s a divided Congress…worse if the GOP takes both.

In order for the changes that the 99% want to occur, the 99% needs to not only re-elect President Obama, but elect a Democratic Congress, both House and Senate, to introduce and pass the policy he puts forth.

There is also the mid-term election in 2014. That’s where Occupy and other Progressives can really make a difference. Run people for office. Progressives that care about the nation and the 99%. From dog catcher on up. Progressives need to build a farm team and the small local positions are a start. Aldermen and mayors, governors and state legislators, school boards and county clerks. They all matter.

For those wondering how to start running for office, may I suggest:  http://www.candidateproject.org/cms/academy/.  It’s free and you go at your own pace.

Get involved. Organize. Run for office and start change happening.

It doesn’t happen by itself…it only happens when enough people want it and work for it.

08
May
12

America 2022 Equal Rights Amendment…Expanded.

19th amendment of the US constitution

19th amendment of the US constitution (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Back to the future…

There still is a need for the ERA, but not in it’s former language. It needs to be MORE inclusive. Giving equal rights not just to women, but to the LGBT community as well. They deserve inclusion. Let’s get things together and protect the rights that SHOULD be given, but are mostly denied or restricted. Take the simple language of the original. Add in the LGBT community and PASS THE DAMN THING.

Women and the LGBT community make up more than HALF of our nation. Why should A MINORITY restrict the rights of a MAJORITY?

Yeah it’s short. So’s the amendment. The wait’s been the longest thing about it.

PASS THE ERA WITH LGBT INCLUDED. 

DO THE RIGHT THING!  NOW!

text of the ERA :  http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/era.htm

my additions are in parenthesis.

THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.(or sexual orientation).
Section 2.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3.
This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

                                                                                                                    (one year)

06
May
12

America 2022 Mortgages & Foreclosures

U.S. Subprime lending expanded dramatically 20...

U.S. Subprime lending expanded dramatically 2004-2006 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This may not go down well with the bankers, but face it, it’s because of their abuse of these that the crisis happened.

First: All mortgages or sales of mortgages WILL BE REQUIRED to be recorded with the County Recorder of Deeds or it’s local equivilant.  That’s what the office is for, recording property transactions and letting people know who owns what property and any mortgages on them. NOT some industry created clearing house. ALL of those would be made ILLEGAL.

Second: There may only be ONE holder of a mortgage on a property. It cannot be split. It’s either held by the issuer or sold in it’s entirety. Any sale would require prior notification of the borrower. NO further modifications of mortgage terms may be initiated by the purchaser of a mortgage from the originating institution.

Third: ALL foreclosures from 2009 to the present would be investigated to insure that they were done legally. ANY that are found that are illegal, the foreclosers would be liable to the evictees for the total price of the home foreclosed plus 300% damages. NO APPEALS WOULD BE ALLOWED FOR THE FORECLOSERS. Borrowers would be allowed 2 appeals.

Fourth: ALL mortgage lenders would be required to provide 5% of their yearly volume to the County Recorder of Deeds office to increase the personnel in order to speed up proper processing.

Fifth: If the papers that show who holds the mortgage on a home cannot be produced to the court in 10 days, the home owner/borrower would then own the home, free & clear because no mortgage lender would exist because there is no legal paperwork showing one. Same for commercial mortgages.  No paperwork in 10 days…no mortgage exists.

 

Banks that hold on to mortgages and properly register them, work with borrowers in order to keep them in their homes, are flexible in refinancing, would be issued a credit of 5% of their total mortgages.  Good behavior needs to be rewarded in this day and age of greed and cheating.

05
May
12

America 2022 Housing

Scottish Canadian

Scottish Canadian (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Ah yes…one of the 800 lb. gorillas.

First, examine combining and dividing, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, VA mortgages, and HUD into 2 agencies. One that has regulation and enforcement as it’s purpose, the other that takes over the lending/guarantee services. Veteran borrowers would have special forms that flag their status.

Second, as part of the banking system restructuring, both private and government mortgages would be refinanced and written down at current prices, not original mortgage.

Third, Affordable/public housing would be a higher priority and overseen by the federal government, but applied locally. Apartment buildings would be highly encouraged. especially in inner city and urban areas.

Fourth, require localities with waiting lists to build enough units to cover those waiting.

Fifth, build SROs for both men & women along with shelters for single parents and families.

All SROs, shelters, and affordable/public housing would be financed/supported: 55% federal, 22.5% state, 22.5% local.

For public housing and shelters, rent would be 10% max of yearly average. 45% of that would be placed in an account for that person/family. Once yearly earning averages 250%+ of the current poverty level, they would be encouraged to look for ‘normal’ housing, the monies in the account would be then used to pay for rent, etc. in advance so they people can get settled. People would be required to place unneeded rent, utility costs, etc. in the account while getting situated. This gets them in the habit of budgeting around constant expenses.

After 2 years of consistent deposits, the person would receive total ownership of the savings account.

Public housing would be built with studio/one bedroom units for those that find themselves stuck in SRO’s for the same cost as they’re paying for the SRO. Electricity, water, and heat would be provided, as well as a stove, fridge, and bed.

 

Special SROs would be built for the homeless that include barbers, free clothes and food, mental health practitioners, and a clinic. They would be encouraged to get treatment and stay at the SRO instead of wandering. There would be activities and workshops. Instead of ignoring them, we should listen to them and help them return to the greater society.

Seniors would be integrated into all housing areas with buildings that are built to accommodate their needs. Clinics, food service, gathering areas, etc., as well as having events there weekly that would used to attract the surrounding neighborhood to come in and interact with them.  If residents want to open a small shop, there would be a small shop area that would be available for them to open one. They would be encouraged to mentor/ help young people that are starting out in the area that they worked in, including housekeeping/childcare.

For those with incomes under one million a year, once their mortgage was fully paid, the government would place 45% of the current price in an annuity towards retirement.

There would be a new national building code that would include the latest materials and practices as well as requiring fire sprinklers, cooking hoods with fire suppression, and a fire alarm system that can be tied into the local fire department.  (Personally, I’d be consulting with Mike Holmes and his people for these. After watching what he does and what he fixes, there is a great need for a better code and tougher licensing and regulation of both builders and re-modelers. )

01
May
12

America 2022 Medicare for All

US residents with employer-based private healt...

US residents with employer-based private health insurance, with self insurance, with Medicare or Medicaid or military health care and uninsured in Million; U.S. Census bureau: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English:

English: (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Well…it’s the best way to advertise it. Medicare for All, if put in place, would necessarily be quite different from our current Medicare system.

Instead of a pay per service system, Medicare for All, for cost and implementation efficiencies , would be a service provider. Doctors and nurses, as well as all other health and health service workers would be government employees. Pay scale? To start, perhaps a scaled average of current incomes for each. After that, a results and service based bonus as well as a COLA.

How would a system be implemented quickly? How about making current state, county, and local health care systems the start for the national system? All those government bodies would probably love to get that cost off their shoulders. Also, VA hospitals would be folded into the system, but still be Veteran oriented more than public, tho they could be Trauma Centers in areas that lack one until one is built in that area.

Purchasing for all, including military needs would be consolidated for purchasing power with suppliers.

The Medicare tax would probably need to be increased…perhaps 14%: 7% for employees, 7% for employers. Still would probably less than current insurance costs. A 10% co-pay would also be put in, with a streamlined Medicaid system put in for those that cannot afford it.  It would also allow insurance companies to offer Medicare Supplemental Insurance.

To get doctors and nurses into the system, a 10 yr. employment option might be used. 5yrs. as a General Practitioner, then, if they plan to be a specialist, 5yrs. performing that specialty. In return, all their Medical school costs would be paid for. They would also get the current pay and be able to learn from more experienced professionals in the system.

It would cover all types of medical needs, mental health, vision, dental, etc..

Private hospitals could contract with Medicare to provide their hospitals for a fee, according to the hospital’s bed count, location, current equipment, and condition. A certain amount would be assigned for upgrades and remodeling costs.

Admittedly this is just a broad outline.  Such a system would need to be worked out between government, professionals, and providers, but it can and should be done. The least it would save is the 15% difference between current Medicare overhead costs and insurance company costs.

Of course, elective surgery would not be covered, but I’m sure insurance companies would come up with a policy to cover those eventually.

Doing this would finally bring America into the 21st century as well as joining the other industrialized nations.

28
Apr
12

America 2022 Infrastructure

After decades of  ignoring needed maintenance, out infrastructure is getting close to being a Third World’s. There needs to be a massive investment into just repairing, replacing, rebuilding and/or restoring the nation’s infrastructure if we even want to THINK about keeping up, much less competing and/or leading in world commerce.

What I propose is what I think is needed and will probably get both sides to argue why this can’t be done. The thing is, not only SHOULD it be done, it really almost HAS to be done to, a) get the nation out of rescission; b) increase demand to get businesses jump started; c) provide jobs for unemployed people; and d) increase revenue.  Yes, increase revenue. By getting more people employed, more taxes are paid. D’oh. More people employed also decreases the strain on the ‘safety net’ because people can now afford to live.

What I propose is a three year program. 2 trillion dollars budgeted per year. What doesn’t get allotted in one year, rolls over to the next decreasing the additional increase.  Each program gets a separate funding account, based on the stated cost sent in by the using state/county/city. ANY cost overruns would be the responsibility of that jurisdiction.  The funding would therefore be locked in for each individual project.

Yes it would cost a maximum of 6 trillion dollars, but the returns of employed people, up to date infrastructure, increased revenues, decreased ‘safety net’ expenditures, would be well worth it.

You can’t be a 21st century nation with an early to mid 20th century infrastructure. It NEEDS to get done…and quickly. China and India aren’t going to wait.  Neither is Brazil, Russia or Europe.

It’s a big nation with a big infrastructure with big problems. Therefore it needs a big solution. Small band-aids just kick the problem upstream and make it worse.

23
Apr
12

America 2022 Social Security

Continue reading ‘America 2022 Social Security’

20
Apr
12

America 2022 “The Easy Stuff”

Impact of permanent Bush tax cut extension inc...

Impact of permanent Bush tax cut extension including estate tax (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Admittedly many things I’m going to propose in the following posts will need discussion. They will also need a Congress and President that are committed to getting them implemented and a public that will pressure them.

Many will take time to implement, possibly years, but there are some that can be started today.

Stop all ‘drone wars’ and bring ALL troops home from Afghanistan before Thanksgiving 2012.

Re-evaluate ALL government programs and agencies. Most likely there are a few that need to be eliminated or folded into others to streamline their work. Some might duplicate things in others and should be merged. This can be done by the President fairly quickly and if Congressional approval and funding is needed, a good case can be presented that would satisfy both sides. For the GOP, a good likelihood of cost reductions and ‘smaller government’. For the Dems, a thorough review and examination of ALL programs and agencies that show that they are being both fiscally responsible and not cutting programs and agencies without cause.

A TOTAL audit of the ENTIRE government done by outside auditors, none having current government contracts or business connections. Money needs to be accounted for and budgets need to be developed for today’s world, not last century. Once the results are in, they can be examined and possible economies might be found, such as a central purchasing agency that gathers orders and bargains for the best price for the best product that will do the job. A $5 screwdriver that lasts for 10 years is less expensive than a 50 cent screwdriver that lasts for 3 months.

All mineral rights and leases need to be reviewed and redone. Most are decades old and are practically giving away precious mineral and fuel resources.

All permits need to be reviewed and redone as well for the same reasons. Corporations are practically stealing the natural wealth of the nation and returning little, if anything.

ALL trading pacts need to be reviewed and compared to reality. Trading partners need to be reviewed as to their upholding their promises and remedies for those that aren’t should be discussed and then implemented if not resolved. “Fair Trade” is only fair if both sides are doing what is promised. Closed or tariff markets and items, and items that are being ‘dumped’ in our markets should be resolved or remedied by restrictions and tariffs until the offenders live up to their agreement.

This is the easy one. Congress has basically done what is needed since the GOP won the House…nothing.  LET THE BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE. ALL OF THEM. There are better things to use time and energy fighting for. The revenue is needed. It’s an easy ‘win’.

Request the Department of Justice to investigate the Bush administration for possible war crimes as required by treaties we’ve signed.

Request the Department of Justice, the SEC, Treasury, and the FBI to investigate Wall Street, banking, and insurance companies for possible crimes leading to the 2008 Crisis.

All of the above could be started within the next 6 months…if the President and the public desire. Especially the public. Pressure government to actually WORK FOR THE GOOD OF THE NATION, not themselves and their wealthy contributors.

It can and should be done.

Think about the press Pres. Obama could get by starting these before the election.  Hint…hint.

15
Apr
12

America 2022. A Vision for America from a Normal Citizen.

October 14: Washington reviews the army assemb...

October 14: Washington reviews the army assembled against the Whiskey Rebellion (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

First off, I’m no expert in anything. The following series of posts are just my vision on where I think America should be heading and why I think so. If people that can, want to take ALL of the posts together and run the numbers, please feel free to do so. That capability is not in my possession at present.

 

Some things here may be totally off the wall, but perhaps that is what is needed.

 

I felt the need to do this because I have the feeling America is nearing another tipping point. A place where it can either change itself through the government, or the 99% will decide to change it another way.

 

This can’t happen here?  In America? That’s for other nations…right?  Well, read the histories of other nations. Governmental change via ‘revolutions or coups happen every few decades for some, every century or so for others.England,France,Germany,Russia,China,Japan, South and Central America,Africa…ALL nations go through it, usually by force. Those that hold power are always reluctant to give it up.

 

America itself has come close. The Whiskey Rebellion…The Civil War…both fighting attempts. The Great Depression might have become one if FDR hadn’t acted as he did. The sixties came close as well, but Johnson and, yes, Nixon helped to quell that by their actions. Read your history folks. It’s more than just words and past events. There are lessons to be learned, problems to be avoided, solutions to be started if one reads.

 

This current ‘Great Recession” is just the type of powder keg that could blow things open if problems aren’t resolved and power returns to the voters, not corporations and the wealthy.

 

Hopefully I’ll get my thoughts and ideas posted and out to those that will try something new and read them. (And give feedback…one can’t grow their thinking without a proper conversation. Those that don’t stagnate and become irrelevant.)

 

 

Changes need to be made, in government, in society, in thinking. Some of my thoughts might step on ‘state’s rights’. That’s one of the things that needs re-thinking. We consider ‘The United States’ as a single nation today, not a collection of separate fiefdoms. Some things need to be set at a national level today, instead of having a collection of 50 separate and different standards. If we want to compare the progress or status of programs, there needs to be a consistent standard across all states.

 

Some things, the national government should pick up more of the costs. Some things need national licensing regulations. In a highly mobile nation such as America, it is almost a necessity to have national standards to cut costs for the private, state, and local sectors. We also like to give lip service to having a ‘level playing field for all’. National standards and regulations for some things would go a long way to make that statement real.

 

As I said, these are just my thoughts, reasons, and ideas concerning my vision for America going into 2022. I do want comments and feedback. Let me know where you think I’m wrong, but also tell me why and give me places to get info. I DO change my mind on things if the information and facts warrant it.

 

Sidelined Buddah

16
Mar
12

A Sad, but Expected Result….

President George W. Bush walks across the tarm...

Image via Wikipedia

This shooting of civilians in Afghanistan. Surprising? Unexpected? Perhaps…for most.

Think about what led up to this.

 

10+ years of non-stop war in two nations with a limited force pool.

Multiple tours of duty…often with less than a year between.

Limited resources given to fight the wars.

Constant threat of attack, even while ‘safe’ in base.

No real way to distinguish between friend or foe.

A really basic language gap.

 

After all those items and stresses placed on top of the basic need to survive…

Fighting a long war and NOT calling for a draft?  Inexcusable.  Done only to keep what happened during the Vietnam war from happening…keeping the students quiet and happy.

Fighting a war on the cheap? Inexcusable. Done only to appease Congress. Wars were kept ‘off-budget’ the entire length of Bush’s 2 terms. Their costs were NEVER included in yearly budgets and ALWAYS needed Congress to authorize added spending each quarter. Check the votes. See how many GOP ‘balance the budget’ people voted to spend taxes off-budget.

Mis-use of the National Guard and Reserves. These are supposed to be called to active service in REAL emergencies in order to allow the regular forces time to acquire and train the additional troops they need…NOT to substitute for drafting them.

 

These were ill-planned, ill-served wars. Totally unneeded. Totally wasteful of lives and treasure. Totally political. Totally stressful on those that fought and fight them.

You can’t really expect troops to go back time after time and not get wounded…physically, mentally or spiritually.

Truthfully, I don’t give a rat’s ass about what happens in Afghanistan after NATO leaves. It was a warring country for centuries…it will be for years to come. Karzai? Let the two-faced corrupt weasel find his own way. He’s got enough embezzled funds to get out.

Our troops need to get out. Now. Before this Christmas if not Thanksgiving. We don’t need to be there. They don’t want us there. The voters don’t want our troops there anymore.

DAMN IT OBAMA! WHAT THE FUCK MORE DO YOU NEED? SCREW THE PENTAGON!

YOU ARE THE COMMANDER-IN CHIEF!

YOU CALL THE SHOTS.

GIVE THE BLOODY ORDER AND GET OUR TROOPS HOME!

NOW!

BEFORE THANKSGIVING!

BEFORE THE ELECTIONS!

BEFORE MORE GET KILLED…OUR TROOPS OR INNOCENT AFGHANS!

 

PRESIDENT OBAMA….THINK HARD ABOUT THIS FACT….

ALL FUTURE BLOOD SPILLED WILL BE ON YOUR HANDS. YOU CONTROL THE ARMED FORCES. YOU DECIDE THEIR FATES BY YOUR ACTIONS!

STOP THE WAR! NOW! IT IS IN YOUR POWER TO DO SO. YOU HOLD THEIR LIVES IN YOUR HANDS. PROVE YOU HAVE THE SPINE TO STAND UP TO THE MILITARY AND END THE AFGHAN WAR…TODAY!

14
Mar
12

Religions: reaching for God…or Grabbing for Power?

Map of the Imperial Circles of the Holy Roman ...

Image via Wikipedia

Yeah, I know.  ” What kind of question is that?”

Well, possibly a question that should be asked, thinking back on history and the goings on in this current election time.

Western religions, those of the Abrahamic traditions, tend to act more as dictators than priests.

Look at history. Heck, look at the holy texts. Loads of rules. Loads of restrictions. Harsh punishments for transgressions. Wars over beliefs. Death for unbelievers. What you can eat. How you can eat it. Who you can marry. How to have sex. How to wash dishes. How to bathe. What you can wear.

Need control much?

Any reason those in control called their followers “sheep” and their “flock”?

As for education, again look at history. Only the elite get education. Women are specifically denied education.

and….Eve ate the fruit from what tree that caused them to get expelled from Eden?   Tree of Knowledge, perhaps?

Ignorance is bliss…  yeah, you don’t know when you’re getting screwed.

Keeping the masses ignorant and dependent on the elites for news, ‘teachings’, and survival is a great way to keep in power.

The Pharisees knew that. Only the high priests were literate and could read and ‘explain’ the holy texts.

So did Popes. Only those of the priesthood could read the texts…or even read. Popes had people killed for translating the texts into languages other than Latin.

If the people don’t know, they can’t argue or revolt.

And power…Kingdom of David….King Solomon…

And who were their enemies?  The ‘unbelievers’ of course.

Christians are no better.  “Holy Roman Empire” ring any bells? Oh yeah…Romans persecuted Christians…in order to keep their Jewish holdings in line. Christianity was a threat to Judaism then, so getting rid of Christians and making it rough to be one was an easy request to keep peace.

When Christianity became larger, Rome adapted and took it in. Again, enemies were the ‘barbarians’, those outside the ‘religion’.

Of course things went from there. Largest land owners were the Church.  Kings kept their crowns by bowing to papal authority. Wars were fought to ‘convert’ lands.

 

Then there was the Catholic Inquisition….and the war when Luther split with the Church…and the ‘civil wars’ in England over Protestant or Catholic rulers…and Ireland…and Scotland…

Of course the factions were no different…witch trials/burnings…Puritans forcing Catholics to form Rhode Island to escape that persecution.

And Islam, sadly, isn’t any better. Moorish wars…battles over Jerusalem…battles between sects.  Same crap…different clothes.

 

THAT  is why there is separation between church and state. Laws need to be agreeable to a majority and respect the rights of a minority.

Religion is supposed to be a PERSONAL quest, not a forced system. It means nothing if one is forced to follow ‘the moral high ground’ and is forced into one religion’s morality by law.

We were given ‘free will’ by the creator in order to be able to choose which path to follow. Each person’s choices are their own and they have to live with them.

 

Republicans…KEEP YOUR MORALITY IN YOUR HOME AND YOUR HEART…AND OUT OF MINE.

Thanks

 

Sidelined Buddah

 

16
Feb
12

What the GOP and Big Business REALLY want….

…They want to turn the US into China. At least as far as labor, business, and environmental concerns go, though they wouldn’t mind a puppet government as well. It’s what they seem to be legislating for. Rollback labor laws. Do away with the EPA. Restrict voting to those that are “documented”. Do away with most of the Bill of Rights…and parts of the Constitution they don’t agree with. Control reproduction. (China does have that one-child law, why not an unlimited child law…no planning.)

All they’re concerned with is their bottom lines, NOT the Nation, much less the people. All the populace is to them are consumers of goods and labor. Nothing more. They see no reason to support anything that doesn’t increase their profits or ‘stockholder value’ immediately and directly. They either fail to see or refuse to see anything other than things that put money into their pockets …NOW.

What good is investing in education or infrastructure? What use is universal healthcare? Why should labor have a voice in how the business is run, they’re just another commodity to be used.

just another rant this time…

Sidelined Buddah

09
Feb
12

I guess it’ll do…for now.

The State of the Union Speech was about what I expected. No really large, exciting plans, just enough to get the swing voters moving towards his side, and not much more. Moving the ‘end of combat’ in Afghanistan is a weasel squirm to appease those that want us out now. Nothing to get people thinking about this nation actually DOING something, just more tip-toe and tiny ideas. We deserve more.

Perhaps President Obama will unveil a sweeping, imaginative, soul-stirring ‘Grand Vision’  at the convention, but somehow I doubt it. he doesn’t seem to either have one or he doesn’t believe the nation wants one. If it’s the former, he’s a disappointment…especially from a former community organizer. No ‘ideal nation’? No vision for a better future? What the hell was he doing in the hood? Passing sympathy and ‘I feel your pain’, but not offering a vision of better things?

If it’s the latter, let me say that the nation hungers for a ‘Grand Vision’. This nation craves leaders with the balls to drive the nation to do more than it feels it can. ‘Grand Visions’ give the nation and it’s people a great goal to strive for, something to work towards, something bigger and better than just making it from day-to-day. This nation was formed around a ‘Grand Vision’. It’s a part of our nation’s DNA. We crave them. We need them to excel.

Look at the last few decades. After the moon landings, what captured the nation’s imagination? What drove research, education, invention? We didn’t shy away from an improbable idea, we drove ourselves to make the vision real. We are still that nation, that people that LOVE a challenge, love to to the improbable and try to make the impossible, possible. This nation does it’s best when challenged and directed towards a worthy vision, give it one.

Newt does have the right idea on the moon base. If we want to get to Mars, we do need to develop the technology and methods and a moon base is an ideal place to do it. It’s close, and we’ve been there before so we know what to expect. A moon base by 2020 is doable and should be part of a ‘Grand Vision’, not the sole goal, but a big part of it.

But, it’s just me dreaming again…

Sidelined Buddah

23
Jan
12

My State of the Union Announcement Idea….

U.S. President George W. Bush and Afghan Presi...

Image via Wikipedia

President Obama wants to make a newsworthy announcement at the State of the Union Address? Here’s one.

Announce that we are starting talks with NATO allies on withdrawing ALL troops from Afghanistan before the end of 2012. We don’t need Karzai’s blessing either.

There is no real reason for being there. Karzai is corrupt, inept, and scared. The local warlords will always be there. The people want us out. All our presence there is doing is giving the Taliban recruiting fodder and feeding billions into the corrupt Afghan government.

What we’re doing not is not worth the cost we’re paying…in treasure and, more importantly, lives. We can’t stay there forever…and they really don’t want us there. What happens after we leave is what would have happened earlier if we weren’t there. Our presence there isn’t making all that much difference in what will happen in that country.

We HAD our Civil War…most nations have them as they grow. Somethings, it seems, can only be worked out by the shedding of blood. They will have their internal wars.  Look at their history.  It’s a constant.  So is foreign intervention…and it’s inevitable failure.

Also, do you really want to keep this war going past this current term? What if, and it’s always possible, the GOP wins? Wouldn’t it be good for the Nation, Obama’s legacy…for him to really EARN and DESERVE that Nobel PEACE prize?

G. W. Bush’s legacy is the economic crash and getting us into two wars. Why not leave a legacy of ending two wars?  And ending drone attacks as well. The economy needs Congress to agree, and right now this House won’t do crap to help.

If President Obama REALLY wants to make BIG news…announce NATO talks to get troops out by the end of 2012.

THIS the President CAN do.  Will he?

20
Jan
12

It’s That Time Of Year Again…..

English: Seal of the President of the United S...

Image via Wikipedia

….State of the Union time. Time for the President to let the Nation know what it already knows and (hopefully) tell the Nation his vision for the next year…except every 4th year, the election year. This is the speech where the President summarizes his past 4 years, and, if seeking re-election, presents his opening argument for why he should get 4 more years.

Honestly, even tho I voted for him 4 years ago, I’m not enthused…and probably won’t be if the President gives the speech I think he will.

Standard greetings….summary of bad things…summary of good things…whining about Congress…intro of  ‘special person’ watching….plans for the next year…plans for the next 4 years, including lackluster vision, small plans, insufficient stimulus plans, possibly letting the Bush tax cuts lapse…closing remarks…God Bless the United States of America.

No big, sweeping vision of where he wants to take the Nation. No grand plans to excite and capture the Nation’s imagination and energy. No real rallying cry for Progressives and Independents to gather around.  just more of the same cautious, pragmatic, limited tripe…and more whining for bipartisanship.

Face it…THE GOP WILL NEVER COMPROMISE. STOP WAITING FOR THEM TO DO SO. THEY WON’T.

CALL THEM ON IT. SLAM IT IN THEIR FACE EVERY CHANCE YOU CAN.

DO NOT…I REPEAT…DO NOT GIVE IN TO ANY REPUBLICAN REQUEST UNLESS THEY GIVE SOMETHING OF EQUAL …OR GREATER VALUE TO THEM UP AS WELL.

GET A TITANIUM BACKBONE AND DIAMOND HARD BALLS ….AND THAT GOES FOR ALL DEMOCRATS…FROM DOG CATCHER ON UP.

FIGHT FOR THE 99% OR WE’LL GET SOME ONE THAT WILL.

Look, I’ve been a Dem all my life, but this current crop has little or no imagination or backbone. They quiver at each GOP poke. I’m a Chicagoan…and old enough to remember Richard J.   We need THAT kind of Dem now. One that stands up for his people and his values and gets things he wants done.

Yeah, I know it’s a different time, but where the hell have all the rock solid pols gone. Ones that drew a line in the sand…then built a concrete wall on it.

Oh yeah…money.  If the voters believe in you…if they really think you’ll work FOR them 95% of the time…that even if you might lose, you fight hard for them….they’ll support, fund, and most importantly…vote for you.

You don’t even need to pick a fight…join the fight the rest of the 99% are fighting…and show that you’ll be there…win or lose.

We’d rather see Dems fight like hell for what the 99% need and fall short because of the GOP than have Dems say they’re fighting for us and melt like a snowball in a blast furnace in the face of opposition.

But that’s just me…..

Sidelined Buddah

20
Dec
11

I’m Still Here

Sorry if I’ve been slacking, but I’ve been a tad busy with the holidays and getting an internet-ready bluray player on which I’ve been sating my anime addiction with my Netflix account.

After the New Year I should be getting back to postings.  Meanwhile I’m going to make a dent in my instant queue.

You all have a great holiday season. Stay as well and safe as you can and enjoy.

Sidelined Buddah

18
Oct
11

My “Grand Plan” Pt.2

….continuing…

Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan in 6 months.  Close Guantanamo in 1 year…either transferring to max security prisons…or releasing after a short time in a halfway house.  Join the World Court.  Start investigations on torture and war crimes. Start investigations on the Wall Street collapse.

Strengthen Dobbs/Franks. Reinstate Glass-Steagal and update. Regulate all derivatives and futures. Strengthen the SEC. Break up the big banks.  Endorse state and municipal banks. Investigate a federal bank. Scrap the present tax codes and form a simplified tax system.

Restructure the entire government agency structure. Nationalize voting laws. Nationalize banking and insurance laws. Nationalize labor laws, allowing the right to unionize nationally. Nationalize the public school systems, adding free 2/4 yr. college funding for community colleges/state universities(same amount tuition voucher for private universities…amount above state tuition is student responsibility).

Consumer debt forgiveness (including federal, state income taxes; student loans; parking tickets; mortgage interest and ‘underwater amount’) at date of signing. Future ‘jubilees’ set for every 11 years.

Medicare for All.  Social Security cap lifted.

All agencies will be either regulating/enforcement or promotion, never both.

Patriot Act repealed. Elections  federally funded and campaign time reduced. No outside funding. No gifts/favors allowed for elected and agency officials and employees. No elected official or agency official/employee may be employed by any industry/company that their agency regulated/promoted.

Marijuana legalized with a 6 mo. preparation period. All possession convictions for 1 lb or less, expunged…all convicted, released. Cocaine legalized the following year.  All other drugs legalized one year after cocaine. All possession convictions of 2 grams or less expunged. All convicted, released.   All convicted to get drug education, job training, and halfway house for 6 months.

All drugs to be regulated and taxed like cigarettes and alcohol.

….to be continued….

(explanations for these will be taken up in future posts.)

10
Oct
11

My “Grand Plan” Pt.1

One of the first things that needs to get done is putting people back in jobs.  This is a SHORT-TERM COMPONENT. (3-5 years).

Fund all bridge repair and/or replacement for all bridges with a grade of B or lower. When bridges collapse, not only do they break critical transport routes, they put lives at risk, not only on the bridge when it collapses, but on both sides as well. First Responders are cut off…bridges also can carry utilities across as well, so if the bridge goes so do the utilities.

All water and sewer systems over 25 yrs. old would be funded to upgrade them. Places with combined sewer and storm drain systems would get funding to separate them to ease urban flooding. Cities would get funding to replace asphalt streets with the latest resurfaceable concrete to get more oil based products out of the system.

All cities would get funding to replace any utilities that refuse to upgrade their systems within 5 years, with utility lines of their own that they could lease for 5-10 years at a time to providers.

Mass Transit would be funded fully to upgrade systems and to add needed service and equipment.

TRUE  High-Speed Rail (150 mph+) would be planned and funded.

Public School buildings would be evaluated for upgradeability.  Those that can, would be upgraded with air conditioning and heating, broadband, and LEED certified. Those that can’t would be replaced.

All transportation facilities would be evaluated and either upgraded or replaced.

Park systems, forest preserve districts, etc. would get improvement funding.

This would be in effect for 3 years.  Each separate project approved would have full budgeted funding set aside in an account specifically for that particular project.

After 3 years, programs would be evaluated again. Those that had goals completed would be eliminated. Those deemed worthy of continuing would be funded for 2 more years.

 

…..to be continued…..

09
Oct
11

Oh Yes…One More Thing

If  I were the president, I’d be getting the general outline of the plan together between now and Thanksgiving.  Between Thanksgiving and Christmas, I’d be holding ‘war meetings” with the Democratic members of Congress, the Democratic committees, labor, and other organizations that would be wanted to endorse the plan.

On New Year‘s I’d announce the general outline, along with the endorsements and signed letter of committment of all Democratic members of  Congress backing the plan.

Scattered bits of info would be continually released between New Year’s and the convention while the needed bills to enact the plan would be drawn up and ready by the convention.

At the convention, the “Grand Plan” would be unveiled along with the announcement that all the bills are ready to go as soon as the new Congress is sworn in. It should be impressed on the public that the president needs to have a Congress that would pass the bills along with his getting re-elected.

Congressional candidates as well as Senators that aren’t up for re-election, along with labor and the endorsing organizations will need to constantly push for re-election and sending a sympathetic Congress to Washington on election day.

Both general and detailed political ads should be run explaining the plan and why certain parts are needed.

All detractors need to be answered IMMEDIATELY. No waiting. Democrats will need to keep on message and control it.

The voters want a plan out. They want to believe that government can work FOR AND WITH them.

09
Oct
11

So Pres. Obama Finally Decides to Lead. One Problem…..

….where is he leading us?  All we have now is a single bill. In order for Pres. Obama to stand a chance for re-election, he needs to tell us WHERE he wants to take us…WHAT his vision is for the nation…WHAT he wants to do.  It’s time to do what few presidents do, present a “GRAND PLAN”.  The conditions almost demand it. High unemployment, stagnant job creation, stalemated Congress, world recession…  Normal political platitudes won’t cut it.

What is needed is a coordinated vision/message throughout the Democratic party and labor. EVERY DEMOCRAT NEEDS TO STAY ON MESSAGE OR BE PRIMARIED WITH SOMEONE THAT DOES. The president needs a group effort…the DCCC, DSCC, DNC, Labor, and every Democratic office holder in the country needs to sign on.

The “GRAND PLAN” needs to be huge…because the problems are huge. No half-measures. And it needs to be a largely Progressive plan. Those are the ones that tend to excite the American Spirit. “Make no small plans. They have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably will not themselves be realized.”

The president’s going to catch flak no matter what he proposes, so might as well go for it.

The plan needs to address ALL the issues…from jobs to immigration to “Medicare for all“. It needs to be in two major parts…Short term(the next 2-4 years) and the long term (5+years). The economy needs to be kick-started and juiced short term before the long term dealing with the debt can occur.  You need to have a steady income and be able to pay current expenses before you can work on eliminating the bulk of your debt.

Knowing me, I’ve got my ideas on what should be in it….and I’ll be posting parts of it in my usual sporadic fashion.

peace   99%

03
Sep
11

The Jobs Speech Obama Doesn’t Have the Balls to Give……

(The speech I wish Obama would give on Thursday)

 

Good Evening fellow Americans,

Today we find ourselves in a situation that took decades and several presidents to make. From Ronald Reagan, who tripled the deficit during his term, to George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton who presided over the death of the Glass-Steagall Act that placed a firewall between commercial banks and investment banks, and The Bank Holding Act of 1956 that put restrictions on bank holding companies, to George W. Bush who took an $86,422 Million budget surplus and, by 2008, turned it into a $450,945 Million deficit, with two ongoing wars whose costs were kept off-budget. There is blame enough to go around.

During the past 3 years, almost every initiative that either the president or Democrats have placed for consideration has been blocked, usually by Senate filibuster, by Republican Senators , whose leader has publically stated, several times, on the record, that his main agenda is to make this president a single term president, and has led his party in a systematic obstruction of any legislation that even seems a ‘victory’ or ‘accomplishment’ for this administration. This has resulted in precious little being accomplished.

For the security and health of this nation, for the welfare of it’s citizens, this needs to stop.

While petty games are being played, people are losing homes, losing jobs, scraping for funds to get food and medicines. Schools are crumbling and cutting essential studies. Bridges are falling and killing people. Businesses are stagnating, especially our small businesses that depend on local conditions being able to support them. Roads and infrastructure is old and failing.

Do we actually think that continuing on this way will preserve this nation?

All that has been loudly debated so far, seem to be directed at the symptom, not the cause.

Lower taxes won’t put people to work. They could drop to zero and not one person would be hired. Relaxing regulations won’t put people to work. They could disappear and very few would be hired.

A review of Business 100 would seem to be in order.

People go into business for ONLY one reason, and that is to make a profit. In order for a profit to be made, there needs to be DEMAND for what you intend to sell. If there is no demand, there is no reason to hire anyone, including yourself.

If there is demand, you start the business, usually by yourself, until you either meet the demand, or you run out of time. If you run out of time, you usually hire another person. If there still is demand to be filled, you continue to hire until you start to see people with free time, then fire or hire according to DEMAND.

Right now, there is a gigantic lack of demand here, and in the world. There are three segments that create demand, consumers, business, and government.

The U.S. is basically a consumer driven economy. It’s dependent on consumers, you and me, to have spare cash available after meeting our bills, to buy stuff. Due to past events, consumers don’t have spare cash to create demand. We need to look elsewhere.

Businesses. Problem here is that, being a consumer driven economy, if consumers can’t demand more, business won’t hire if their current workers are meeting the demand out there. If business isn’t producing more to meet consumer demand, business can’t increase it’s demand either.

That leaves government.

Yes, I realize that we need to reduce the federal debt, but that can’t be done overnight. It’s a gradual, long-term process.

Yes, I realize that anything government does to create demand will increase the debt. But as I stated, reducing taxes on those that don’t need it, doesn’t create demand. They are already spending what they will spend.

What is needed is a large, short-term boost, say over the next 2-4 years.

What I’m putting forth is an infrastructure bill that immediately greenlights all infrastructure repair requests. It takes bridges that have B ratings and below and greenlights repair or replacements. It gives cities funds to replace infrastructure over 30 years old, burying utilities such as electric, phone and cable, and separating sewers from storm drains for urban flood control. It provides funds for needed grade separations of rail and road.

As each project is approved, enough funds to see it to completion is placed in an account to fund that project. Any overruns will be the responsibility of states and cities.

There is $20 billion per state for rehiring first responders and fully funding education, from pre-school thru college to at least 40%.

School buildings over 25 years old will be funded for replacement in order to have all schools wired for the 21st century and able to provide a comfortable learning environment. This means proper heating and air conditioning as well as phys ed areas.

The Bush tax cuts will be repealed and four added tax levels will be added.

$250,000 – $1 million….37%

$1 million – $10 million….43%

$10 million $100 million….46%

$100 million +….  48%

Capital gains tax will vanish and ALL investment income will be treated as basic income.

The Social Security tax cap will be done away with.

Discussions on decreasing the long-term debt will start.

I know those that opposed my initiatives in the past will be loud and strident about this as well. This is expected. I will insist that all of this be approved and that it lasts for 3 years with a trigger for a 4th year if unemployment is over 6%.

Let the nation see who is really working for the good of the nation and who is held in thrall of their corporate masters, working only to fill the coffers of the rich at the expense of the nation and it’s people.

Demand is what is needed to get people to work and our nation moving. Interest rates are low so now is the time to do this. And it is not just our nation that will be helped.  Our expanding demand will spread through the world’s economies and ease their problems as well.

By doing this big thing, we not only raise ourselves, but all. This is a big problem.  It needs a big solution. This is my solution and it will work.

The problem is a lack of demand. This creates demand by rebuilding and improving our nation, making it better able to compete in this world economy.

Thank you.  God bless you and God bless the United States of America.

(Ah….if only)

31
Aug
11

Tea Party needs Business 100 refresher.

Apparently, few Tea Party (and GOP) members remember or have taken Business 100, Intro to Business. If they did, they would quickly see the very shaky foundation they have placed their job creation plans on. There is ONLY one true creator of jobs: DEMAND.

One goes into business to make a profit by making or providing products and/or services. If there is NO demand, there is no reason to hire anyone…including yourself. If there IS a demand, you start by doing thing with as few people as possible, usually yourself. Once DEMAND has overtaken your ability to fill it by yourself, THEN you hire another employee. Once demand overtakes you once again, you hire another. This continues until you find you and your employees with spare time. A small amount of spare time is tolerable, but if the amount of spare time INCREASES, that means that DEMAND has dropped.  If it continues to drop, you normally lay-off or fire employees until spare time vanishes.

Decreasing taxes and/or deregulating DOES NOT increase DEMAND. Governmental spending cuts DO NOT increase DEMAND.  In fact, spending cuts can have the effect of DECREASING demand by decreasing government employees.

If people don’t have a steady income, they tend to cut back on spending: THEY DEMAND LESS GOODS AND SERVICES. Less demand means less employment in other areas. If you can’t afford a new car, you don’t buy it. There for there is less demand by one car. If 10,000 people do the same, there is less demand by 10,000 cars. Less demand = less sales. Less sales=less profit and less product needed.  This results in less employees, which continues the cycle.

Right now, there is $1 trillion less demand for goods and services. That is a lot of production that was lost. Consumers (in other words, normal folk…employees…you and me) don’t have the resources (disposable income…spare cash) to make up this massive drop and create DEMAND enough to get employers (job creators) to rehire people.

Businesses can’t make up for the DEMAND loss either. They are there to make a profit. If there is no DEMAND to fill, there is no reason to hire.

That leaves ONLY one entity that can create enough DEMAND, the government.

Yes, we do need to reduce the deficit…LONG-TERM. Right now we have a severe SHORT-TERM crisis and therefore INCREASED government spending over the SHORT-TERM (2-4 years) is needed…and not a small increase, but a large increase…several trillion dollars worth. This nation has more than enough deferred maintenance on infrastructure and needed projects to be able to use several trillions wisely to improve the nation and bring us into the 21st Century.

Increased DEMAND for products and services increases the need for more employees to fill the increased DEMAND. More employed people means more people have more spare cash to spend on more goods and services that means an increase in DEMAND again and the need for more to be employed.

More employed people means more taxes paid. More taxes paid means more money to DECREASE THE DEBT.

INCREASED SHORT-TERM GOVERNMENT SPENDING, WISELY USED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND NEEDED PROJECTS LEADS TO DECREASING THE NATIONAL DEBT.

Odd as it may seem, a large, short-term increase in the national debt should result in the long-term decrease of the national debt.

Obama needs to go big, expansive, and visionary in his upcoming jobs plan. Anything less means long-term hardship for the nation.

21
Aug
11

Japanese Education System Pt. 6. Grades 1-6

Yep, after a long break it continues. My comments inserted into the Dept. of Ed. study.
Sidelined Buddah.
Lower Secondary (Grades 1 – 6)

Entrance
Entrance into elementary school is a major step in a child’s life. Preparation begins several months in advance. A mother attends meetings sponsored by the school that her child will attend.

>>>>(Something that schools here might well implement. Most parents today haven’t a clue on how to properly prepare their kids for entry into school life)

The school specifies what it expects the child to know and be able to do upon entry. Well-organized personal habits, polite use of language, and traffic safety are among the matters emphasized.

>>>>(Spelling it out for the parents ahead of time eliminates the common excuse, “But how was I to know what was needed? “)

Families make much of the new 1st grader’s symbolic entry into a more grown-up world. Congratulations and gifts are in order. Virtually all children are outfitted with a personal desk and chair at home, a regulation hard-sided leather backpack (which costs parents from $75 to $150), school hats and insignia, and various supplies specified by the school.

>>>>(In other words, ENTRY into first grade is treated like we treat graduation. In my opinion, a much better tradition. Today you really never ‘graduate’, you just move on to more advanced and different learning.)

The formality and seriousness of the matriculation ceremony for 1st graders underscores the transition the children are making and the importance that school will have in their lives. Fifth and 6th graders join school officials and community representatives in welcoming the new 1st graders and their parents. Mothers and children dress in their best attire. Speeches from city and school board officials and the principal emphasize the importance of the child’s first symbolic step into society.

>>>> (Right from 1st grade, kids learn that learning is important and serious. Dressing up in their best outfits and officials greeting them at school just emphasizes this. Here we might need to include sports and entertainment celebs as well. And in cities like Chicago and New York, it might be more feasible to divide the city into manageable areas and stagger the 1st grade starting so all can get the same treatment. It would also show that grownups are willing to make time to impress upon the students how highly they consider education)

Facilities

Japanese school buildings are plain, but functional. Generally, they are three-story, rectangular, concrete structures which lack central heating or air conditioning. Room stoves are commonly used in cold weather.

>>>> (We can use this model, but in theU.S.we do need to include central air and heat. Our weather can be more severe than what most of Japan receives)

The lack of decoration and furnishings is believed to help the child focus on learning and building character. Yet all schools have excellent educational facilities, including libraries, music rooms, art rooms, gymnasia, and playgrounds. Seventy-five percent of public schools have swimming pools. [1] Music rooms ordinarily include electric organs, pianos, xylophones, percussion instruments of various kinds, and often a ruled blackboard suitable for teaching music reading. Science and art rooms are similarly well equipped.

>>>>(In other words, spend the money where it really counts…equipping the schools with the facilities and equipment that is needed for learning to excel, not bric-a-brac .)

The principal’s office and teachers‘ room are on the ground floor. The desks in the teachers’ room are arranged so that the teachers of a given grade sit facing each other with desks touching. When not in their classrooms, teachers work and relax in this face-to-face situation. This facilitates cooperation and coordination of effort among teachers of the same grade.

>>>>( Yep, no cubicles. Open floor plan.  )

Each grade occupies a separate section or floor of the building, with each class assigned its own room. Classrooms are uniformly rectangular with windows on one side and a doorway on the other that opens to a hallway running the length of the building. The rooms are crowded with desks. Decorations are usually limited to a display of recent pupil artwork or perhaps a tank of goldfish.

>>>>(Different than our normal central hallway style, but it does keep things a tad more orderly.)

Desks are typically arranged facing the blackboard. The rows are two seats wide and each pair of seats is usually occupied by a boy and a girl. Also, teachers may have students rearrange their desks into a U-shape to facilitate class discussion or into clusters of 4-6 desks for collaborative activity in small groups.

>>>>(Rather than each row consisting of a separate desk.  A bit more efficient use of space. No real need for that added empty space.)

Most public elementary schools do not have uniforms, but all require something to identify the child as attending that particular school, such as a school cap or badge. Some schools require students to purchase identical athletic apparel, which is often worn during regular classes as well.

>>>>( Something that lets the kids feel they belong to something. Most people have a need to ‘belong’ and this fills that need and builds a desire to attend ‘their’ school…their ‘club’.)

Administration and staff

The principal and the head teacher occupy the two primary leadership positions. Ninety-eight percent of elementary school principals are men, and three-quarters of them are over age 55. [2]

>>>>(No real important reason, just the way things were structured in the past led to this result now)

The principal is responsible for all school activities and plays multiple leadership roles. Much of his time is devoted to representing the school with local authorities, the PTA, and various outside groups. Through regular weekly addresses to the student body, he also symbolizes the school’s authority and expectations.

>>>>( In other words, the principal is responsible for representing the school to other groups and authorities and setting the policies and expectations for the school, not running the school day to day. )

The daily life of the school, however, is usually directed by the head teacher.

>>>>( Note: You can get rid of the assistant principal)

Ninety-seven percent of elementary school head teachers are men, and most are between the ages of 50 and 55.

>>>>(Again, due to past policies)

[3] The head teacher is thoroughly knowledgeable about the entire school and its activities. He manages the implementation of policy in regular school activities, special projects, and other programs of the school. His main responsibilities are administrative. He teaches only about 3 hours per week. [4] Head teachers get paid very little extra; the short term reward is in the honor and respect of one’s peers. [5] Longer term, head teacher experience is an important part of the career path to a possible principalship.

>>>>(In other words, Head Teacher is the apprenticeship position for principal. Note the phrase “knowledgeable about the entire school and its activities”. Head Teacher has been at the school for awhile, not someone hired from the outside.)

Each class is headed by a single teacher who, with rare exceptions, is responsible for all subjects. Teachers average 22-23 hours per week in direct teaching activities. [6] They also spend considerable time working and planning together outside their classrooms.

>>>>(Similar to elementary schools here. The teaching time equals right around 5 hrs. on week days and 2-3 on Saturday.)

Approximately 60 percent of elementary school teachers are women. Two-thirds of all teachers are under the age of 40. [7] More than one-half (58 percent) of the faculty have 4-year degrees, and approximately one-third have graduated from a junior college. Fewer than 1 percent of the teachers have graduate degrees. [8]

>>>>(This would seem to imply that the head teacher and principal statistics will gradually shift over the next decade)

Teachers teach a different grade level each year, thus gaining broad experience with the curriculum and characteristics of all six grades. It is common for a given teacher to teach the same group of students for 2 years in a row.

>>>>(Good idea. It gives both teacher and students some degree of security when moving up a grade. Both know each other from the previous year. Since it’s a 2 year timeframe, students get 3 different teachers in this period of schooling)

Talented and experienced teachers are more frequently assigned to the 1st grade because that stage is considered critical in establishing children’s attitudes and learning habits for the rest of their school lives.

>>>>(Hopefully our schools follow this mode of thought, but somehow I don’t think they do. They really should.)

In all but the smallest schools, each grade level forms a working unit for administration, instructional planning, and informal in service education. Teachers meet once or twice a week in grade level committees to discuss the coming week’s teaching schedule and other activities. Each grade is led by a grade level head teacher who takes the lead in helping new or weaker teachers with practical suggestions for improving instruction and classroom management. Each committee prepares and distributes a weekly or monthly newsletter to the parents of children in that grade. The newsletter includes a report on the class’s recent activities, a detailed schedule of curriculum material to be covered, and an inspirational message from teachers to parents.

>>>>(No teacher teaches alone. The practice of distributing newsletters for each grade level, especially on a weekly basis, helps the parents keep up with what’s been going on. Again, something that really should be implemented here.)

School calendar

The Japanese school year provides numerous opportunities for the entire student body to participate in special events and ceremonies.

>>>>(Yes they have a longer school year…but they tend to enjoy it more. Time to toss the Puritanical idea of school and adopt some ofJapan’s ideas)

These are carefully planned and highly organized. They are managed primarily by the student council and classroom representatives, with the guidance of teachers and school tradition. Through these activities, students work together and develop class and school identity. Classes spend considerable energy in planning and practicing these activities. For some time prior to such events, the regular class schedule is relaxed to allow the necessary time for preparation.

>>>>( In other words, the kids are given the responsibility to plan and execute their activities with teachers on the side guiding things along. Getting students INVOLVED and INTERESTED in school. Something desperately needed here.)

In May, it is common to have an all-school trip to a nearby park or cultural monument or even an overnight field trip for all students of a given grade level. The goal is to broaden student knowledge about nature and the world around them in an enjoyable, memorable fashion, as well as to train students in appropriate public behavior.

>>>>(Field trips…I remember field trips.  Do they do these anymore?  If not, why not? )

The 6-week summer vacation occurs from the middle of July until the end of August.

>>>>(Here, I’d go from July 4th until Labor Day. An additional week or two, but it tends to include the hottest times of the years, soooo…)

During this period, teachers take their own holidays, but frequently come to school to engage in in-service education and supervise students’ club activities. Student sports clubs continue to meet, and the swimming pool may be open for student use.

>>>>(Again, keeping students involved with school. Not to mention making use of facilities that would normally be shut down here. You want to keep kids off the street? Here’s a great idea.)

Although classes are not in session, vacation homework and individual research assignments ensure that instructional continuity is not broken.

>>>>(Yes, vacation homework, but properly planned, it can be fun homework)

The school also provides an extensive set of rules and recommendations to families concerning student behavior, daily study, and play schedules during the vacation. This guidance fosters continuity in self-discipline and other desirable personal habits.

>>>>(And, boy, do we need this in the U.S..)

Autumn in Japan is closely associated with school athletic festivals. Children eagerly anticipate their school’s annual Sports Day. The entire student body practices intricate choreographed cheers and marching maneuvers. On the day of the event, parents and the neighborhood are invited to watch each class compete in races and other track and field events. All are encouraged to do their best, both for their own class and to help the school put its best foot forward. The goals of Sports Day are to build class and school solidarity and to encourage wholehearted individual effort and perseverance.

>>>>(Again, keeping kids interested and involved and adding fun. And the Sports Day gives the neighborhood a chance to show their support for schooling)

The Culture Festival in the late fall or spring is another high point. On that occasion each classroom plans and rehearses skits or other performances and every club demonstrates or displays examples of its activities. Every child is involved in one or more of these activities. Families and the community are invited to attend and the entire school endeavors to do its best.

>>>>( Another event that teaches in a fun way, involving students in planning and executing their own ideas…and showing them off to their families and the neighborhood)

The school year ends in March with a formal graduation or end-of-year ceremony which is somewhat less significant than the matriculation ceremony at the beginning of the year. Japanese culture places more emphasis on congratulations and encouragement at the outset of a child’s educational career than upon its successful completion.

>>>>(Another modification to our normal way of thinking that should be implemented. Yes, you finished this part, but there is much more ahead.  Good work and see you next year . ; ) )

Daily schedule

The school day begins with a 10-minute faculty meeting in the teachers’ room. Meanwhile, halls and classrooms are filled with the clamor of students arriving and preparing for the day. Generally speaking, children meet to walk to school together in neighborhood groups led by the 6th grade children.

>>>>(Good way to promote safety. Walking to school in a group is safer than single kids walking alone.)

Two or three times a week, following the teachers’ meeting, the entire school gathers, either to perform morning exercises on the athletic field or have a short assembly and receive an inspirational message from the principal.

>>>>(Good idea. It lets the students know that the principal is working for them and wants them to do well. )

Classroom activities begin at 8:30 a.m. with a 15-minute morning class meeting, which is led by student monitors.

>>>>(In Chicago, that’s half an hour earlier when I went to school. The daily class meeting led by student monitors….good idea)

Then two class periods are followed by a 25-minute recess and two more class periods.

>>>>(Recess mid-morning.  Gets rid of pent up energy for the next two periods,)

Lunch at 12:30 p.m. is followed by a recess which lasts until 1:40 p.m.

>>>>(So an hour and ten minutes for lunch. Much like I had when I was in elementary school. I do think it’s changed tho)

Almost all Japanese elementary schools have a mandatory school lunch program for which parents are assessed minimal fee. Students generally eat in their classrooms and take turns serving their classmates. Teachers remain with their classes during lunch.

>>>>( Mandatory school provided lunches…good idea. No special treatment/programs. Students serve each other in their classrooms so no need for a cafeteria. Teachers stay and eat with their class. Nice. Breaking bread together tends to promote a feeling of belonging.)

After lunch and recess, in most schools the student body spends 20 minutes cleaning and sweeping the hallways and classrooms, an activity deemed important for character development. (In other schools, cleaning takes place at the end of day.)

>>>>(It also instills a feeling of investment in the school facilities. If you have to keep it clean there is less incentive to dirty it up, and peer pressure tends to bring most into a similar way of thinking. “Hey, we just cleaned this floor. Pick up that wrapper.” )

Then, after two periods of afternoon classes, the day ends with a 10-minute class meeting. Following this, students pack their textbooks, notebooks, and other materials into their backpacks to carry home. No books or notebooks are left in students’ desks.

>>>>( Starting and ending with class meetings..cool.  Nothing left in school=no need for lockers. Just a coat and boot rack for the classroom.)

At 3:50 p.m., students scatter to school organized clubs, private lessons, or home. Club activities include sports, music, and crafts. On weekdays, teachers often remain until 5 or 6 p.m. to plan lessons, lead club activities, or attend meetings.

>>>>(Again different than when I went to school, 50 minutes longer. Again, good use of school facilities. Clubs, activities, and private lessons keep kids off the street. Teachers here will possibly need to change their mindset about leaving right after school tho)

On Saturdays, school ends at noon, after three class periods.

>>>>(Another idea that should be implemented.  It gives parents additional time to run errands between 8,30 and noon)

Education philosophy and teaching practices

Two important assumptions underlie much of Japanese elementary and secondary education practices. One is that virtually all children have the ability to learn well and to master the regular school curriculum.

>>>>(One of the main differences between here and Japan. Here we assume our kids can’t learn.)

The second is that certain habits and characteristics, such as diligence and attention to detail, can be taught. The premise is that all children have equal potential. Differences in student achievement are thought to result largely from the level of effort, perseverance, and self-discipline, not from differences in individual ability. Hence, students in elementary schools are not grouped according to ability.

>>>>( And we think we treat all kids equally.  Hah. Teaching is different if you assume that all can do the work than if you assume that you need to teach to different learning speeds. Public education does come with limitations. Teaching needs to be done to the higher standards. Additional help (tutoring, private lessons) should be available AFTER normal class time to those that need it.)

Promotion to the next grade is not based on academic achievement, but is automatic. Neither is classroom instruction individualized according to ability differences. However, Monbusho encourages teachers to give extra attention and encouragement to weaker students.

>>>>( Not slow down the class for those students, but keep them interested and stop at their desks during class assignments to help.)

Students also supplement their school work at home and at juku.

The classroom teacher capitalizes on the 1st graders’ feeling of self-importance and awe at being in school by carefully instructing them in proper behavior and classroom routines during the first weeks of school. These include how to rise and bow at the beginning of class, how to sit, and how to arrange the desktop for study. In the Japanese view, this lays a proper foundation for desirable attitudes and habits which will continue throughout the child’s school life.

>>>>(First things taught are how they are expected to act while in school and how thing are done in class. Good ideas. Once you let the kids know what is expected of them, most will tend to try and do their best to live up to expectations.)

Teachers in the early elementary years are not directly influenced by the entrance examination pressure which students will face in entering high school and college. Thus, they have more freedom in instructional approach than their secondary school colleagues who must prepare students to pass entrance examinations.

>>>>( In other words, learning is more important than passing standardized tests. Time to trash “ No Student Left Behind” and get serious about public education)

Almost all elementary schools use educational television broadcasts by NHK, the Japanese National Public Broadcasting Service. Science, social studies, and ethics programs are the most popular. Programs are broadcast weekly for each different grade level and are 15 minutes long. Yearly programming schedules are issued before the beginning of the school year so that teachers can use them in developing lesson plans. Each trimester, NHK also publishes a teacher’s text, which contains a detailed description of each scheduled program and notes concerning how to use it in the classroom, for each grade level. These texts are widely available in local bookstores. [9]

>>>>(Yes…I’m going to suggest a nation-wide SECOND PBS, dedicated to educational broadcasts, similar to Japan. And yes, I’m suggesting that ALL Pre-k thru 12 schooling be nationalized and standardized. My reasoning will be stated later.)

The students’ attention centers around teacher and textbook. Students learn to take notes in the 1st grade.

>>> (Note taking in 1st grade…don’t you wish they taught you that then….)

A separate notebook is maintained for each subject, and in it the student records the lecture or classroom activity.

>>>(Talk about instilling good learning habits. Remember your surprise when this was suggested…in high school.)

Written examinations are given frequently, and homework is assigned routinely.

>>>( Tried and true technique. Frequent exams let the teacher know if the lessons are being absorbed and where emphasis is needed. Homework, hated tho it is, by both students AND teachers, helps to re-enforce lessons.)

Report cards are issued three times a year.

>>>(One time less than here since they tend to be on a trimester style)

Each lesson is planned according to the sequence of material in the textbook, the teacher’s manual, and the school’s instructional guidelines which in turn are based on the Monbusho course of study. Teachers are required to cover all of the material that the course of study mandates for each grade level.

>>>(So this means that instruction is pretty uniform throughout Japan.)

A basic characteristic throughout elementary and secondary education is the continuing emphasis on science and mathematics. The Japanese consider these subjects the basic building blocks of technology, and curriculum requirements ensure that all children receive extensive grounding in them. Mathematics is one of the required subjects on university entrance examinations and, hence, receives continuing attention through all grades.

>>>(Gee, wonder why the Japanese always kick out ass in science and math?  Here ya go….)

Classroom management and school life

Japanese classes are large by American standards. In 1983, the average class size was 34 students and the legal maximum was 45. Hence 45 students may be assigned to a single class before two smaller classes are formed. Monbusho is now midway through a plan to reduce the maximum permitted class size from 45 to 40 by the year 1991. [10]

>>>(Which I always find a tad funny. My 8th grade class in Chicago was 53.)

Within each classroom, students are organized in small, mixed ability groups called han. These groups of 4-6 students are cooperative study and work units. Teachers frequently ask the class to divide into han to work on specific assignments and have them report the results to the class. The han is also the primary unit for discipline, chores, and various other classroom activities.

>>>(Something that should be used here. Study groups don’t tend to be encouraged until high school here. Starting from the beginning with study groups is a great way to form learning habits)

Student monitors are an important part of Japanese classroom management. Each day or two, a different pair of students is in charge of calling the class to order, assisting the teacher in administrative tasks, and encouraging classroom discipline. The monitor role is rotated frequently so that every student in the class has the opportunity to serve in this capacity.

>>>( No elections or popularity contests, all get an equal turn at being class monitor. Tends to build confidence and self assurance.)

Through the use of han and monitors, teachers delegate much responsibility for classroom management and discipline to the students themselves. Through frequent rotation of roles and responsibilities, all students have the opportunity to gain leadership experience and develop first-hand understanding of the importance of cooperation and mutual effort in achieving a smoothly run classroom.

>>>(Teachers can therefore concentrate more on teaching rather than babysitting. Peer pressure and knowing that they are all responsible for class behavior tends to keep class under control.)

All schools have active student governments composed of elected representatives from each 4th-6th grade class. Student government activities reinforce school policies and give students experience in large scale planning. Although meetings and activities are supervised by teachers, students lead the organization.

>>>( Again, keeping students involved by giving them responsibility.)

Participation in student government also provides experience in representing one’s peers, in group decision making, and in assuming responsibility.

While Japanese classes are larger than American ones, Japanese classrooms are more orderly. Students are more attentive and better behaved and transitions between activities are more rapid and orderly. The net result is significant: Japanese students spend about one-third more time during a typical class period engaged in learning than American students do during a typical class period. [11] It is important to note that this high level of organization and discipline is achieved without strong direct exercise of authority by the teacher.

The Japanese approach to classroom management and discipline is to provide extensive training from the first day of a child’s school career in the routines and rituals which make up the classroom day. Coming to order, preparing one’s desk for study, and lining up for dismissal are practiced repeatedly as separate routines until the entire class can perform them quickly and automatically. The daily monitor cues the class to perform the various routines. The teacher is, thus, freed from the necessity of personally managing transitions. These routines allow students to see themselves as responsible for their own behavior and help them develop pride in conducting themselves in an orderly, efficient manner. [12]

>>>(Let the kids know what is expected from them, teach them how to properly do what is expected of them, and do it from day one)

Japanese teachers rarely reprimand individual children. Instead, they prefer to guide the class in such a way that students assume responsibility for correcting each other’s behavior. Rather than calling an inattentive child by name and encouraging him to hurry, the teacher typically remarks that a particular han is not ready and allows the child’s han-mates to exert peer pressure to encourage the child to take or complete the necessary action.

>>>(Peer pressure is always more persuasive than ‘the voice of authority’)

In Japan, “student guidance” refers to the direction provided by the classroom teacher to help students establish fundamental attitudes and behaviors necessary for successful school life. Its scope is broad, ranging from study habits to academic counseling, social behavior, and character development. The influence of student guidance is evident during classroom instruction and also at daily morning and afternoon class meetings, school events and ceremonies, and periodic teacher visits to students’ homes.

>>>(More than curriculum is taught in Japanese classrooms. And more responsibility is placed on teachers. )

Curriculum

Curriculum content and the sequence of instruction for each subject and grade level are specified in considerable detail by Monbusho. Teachers are free to incorporate supplementary teaching materials if they believe they enhance coverage of prescribed course content. Textbooks are written and published by commercial publishers, although the content is based closely upon Monbusho guidelines. After careful review to assure conformity with the prescribed courses of study, the Ministry of Education approves textbooks for use in elementary schools. Schools then select from among the books on the approved list. These are purchased by the government from the commercial publishers and distributed free of charge to children in both public and private schools. The books become the personal property of the students.

>>>( If you want to be able to compare, you need a set standard. Government set standards for instruction and textbooks allows the government to accurately tell how schools are doing. Government purchased books also relieve individual schools (and parents) of that expense.)

The elementary course of study and the required number of class periods devoted each week to each subject are summarized in table B.

Table B. Required Number of Class Periods Per Week and Year in Each Subject at Each Elementary Grade Level*

Subject

Grade

1

2

3

4

5

6

JapaneseSocialStudiesArithmeticScience

Music

Art&Handicraft

Homemaking

PhysicalEducation

Moral Education

Special Activities

Total number of
required class
periods

8
(272)
2
(68)
4
(136)
2
(68)
2
(68)
2
(68)


3
(102)
1
(34)
1
(34)
25
(850)

8
(280)
2
(70)
5
(175)
2
(70)
2
(70)
2
(70)


3
(105)
1
(35)
1
(35)
26
(910)

8
(280)
3
(105)
5
(175)
3
(105)
2
(70)
2
(70)


3
(105)
1
(35)
1
(35)
28
(980)

8
(280)
3
(105)
5
(175)
3
(105)
2
(70)
2
(70)


3
(105)
1
(35)
2
(70)
29
(1015)

6
(210)
3
(105)
5
(175)
3
(105)
2
(70)
2
(70)
2
(70)
3
(105)
1
(35)
2
(70)
29
(1015)

6
(210)
3
(105)
5
(175)
3
(105)
2
(70)
2
(70)
2
(70)
3
(105)
1
(35)
2
(70)
29
(1015)

*Each class period is 45 minutes long. Numbers in parentheses are number of class periods required per school year.

Sources: Okuda, Shinjo. “The Curriculum and its Contents in Secondary Education.” Paper presented at International Seminar on Educational Reform, National Institute of Multimedia Education, Kyoto, Chiba, October 14-17, 1985, and Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture. Course of Study for Elementary Schools in Japan.Tokyo: Monbusho, 1983, p.122.

Japanese language. [13] Japanese children spend one-fourth of their time in elementary school mastering their own language. This is an arduous, complex task. Written Japanese is a mixture of Chinese characters and Japanese phonetic symbols. Three separate writing systems must be learned. Two of these consist of 48 phonetic symbols each. The third system is composed of approximately 2,000 Chinese symbolic characters, each of which can be read or pronounced in several ways, depending on its context. These characters usually are visually complex units requiring from one to twenty brush strokes each. In regular text, Chinese characters are combined with the phonetic symbols according to carefully prescribed rules to form words and sentences. While the Japanese phonetic symbols have little ambiguity in pronunciation, the Chinese characters almost invariably have two or more possible pronunciations.

Two additional features of the Japanese language compound the difficulty for learners. Individual words are not visually separated from each other, and children must learn to intuit which symbols must be grouped together to form a word. Furthermore, there are two different styles of following text. The first is to read from left to right, horizontally, as in Western books. The second is to read columns vertically from top to bottom, starting with the column on the far right, in traditional Japanese style. In Japanese language classes, textbooks are printed vertically and children write their compositions in similar form. In arithmetic and science, textbooks are printed horizontally, and notebooks for these subjects must be kept in similar fashion.

During the first year of elementary school, children learn to read and write the two 48-character phonetic systems and a few Chinese characters. Each year thereafter, approximately 200 Chinese characters are added, along with their various readings and rules of spelling for common words. It is not until the end of the 9-year compulsory period that children have mastered the approximately 2,000 characters necessary to basic literacy–enough to permit the reading of newspapers, for example. In learning to write, proper shaping of letters and characters is stressed at all levels. To this end, formal training in calligraphy, using traditional brushes and ink, is begun in the 3rd grade. The complexity of the Japanese writing system is illustrated by figures 5 and 6, which show the Japanese phonetic letters and the Chinese symbolic characters to be learned in the first 3 grades.

Figure 5. The Two Systems of Japanese Phonetic Letters
< src=”images/jed7.h1.gif”>

Figure 6. Chinese Characters To be Learned in the First Three Grades < src=”images/jed7.h2.gif”>

In addition to reading and writing, Japanese language classes emphasize other important skills. Practice in public speaking, speaking calmly and succinctly before a group, is a regular part of the curriculum, starting in 1st grade.

>>>(And we complained about English classes…. Good idea to start Public Speaking classes in 1st grade)

Formal grammar is taught beginning in the 3rd grade, and by the 6th grade has advanced through auxiliary verbs, prepositions, and conjunctions. Thirty percent of the time in language class is devoted to composition. Composition is taught beginning with the combination of subject and predicate in the 2nd grade and advancing by 6th grade to alternative styles and ways of expressing the same thought.

Social studies. The social studies curriculum stresses the interdependence of all levels of society and the responsibility of each individual for the collective welfare. In the 1st grade, the focus is on the child’s own school and family. In the 2nd, the emphasis shifts to the community. At subsequent grade levels the scope expands to encompass the city, the prefecture, the nation, and foreign countries. In the 6th grade, students receive an overview of Japanese history and the modern Japanese political system. They are also briefly introduced to world geography and Japan’s relations with other nations. Learning to understand maps, graphs, and tables is stressed throughout the elementary school period.

>>>(We DO need to expand Social Studies in our public schools. There is no reason ANYONE should not know where theU.S.is. How and why the nation was founded, and how the system works)

Arithmetic. Children in Japan are introduced to many concepts such as decimals, fractions, and geometric figures earlier than their American counterparts. Accuracy in computation is stressed more than the ability to estimate. [14]

>>>(Any wonder why Japanese cars crushU.S.cars. Accuracy=precision=better products)

More emphasis is placed on geometry, ratios, proportions, and reading charts than in most American elementary schools.

>>>(Hence the current financial situation….)

Japanese arithmetic textbooks are succinct and provide little repetition or review. Concepts and skills are typically presented only once. The emphasis is placed on proper initial instruction and elaboration by the teacher. It is assumed that the child will persevere in drill and study until the concept is mastered. Teachers pace their coverage of the material so that the entire course of study and textbook have been covered by the end of the year and the class can proceed to the next grade level uniformly prepared.

>>>(In other words, teachers are required to actually teach the concepts and skills so students can grasp them. Students actually are required to work on what was taught until they master them themselves.  )

The number of hours devoted to arithmetic in the elementary school curriculum is more than in American elementary schools, but not dramatically so. Japanese children spend considerably more time studying arithmetic, however, because of more efficient use of the class hour and more time devoted to out-of-school effort through a combination of homework, private tutors, and remedial or cram schools. These factors combine to help Japanese children achieve their competitive edge in international comparisons of achievement in mathematics.

>>>(You mean spending 5 minutes getting class settled down at the start isn’t efficient? )

Science. The science curriculum aims to help children develop the ability to observe, conduct simple experiments, and learn to appreciate and enjoy nature. Several core areas are restudied at successive grade levels with increasing sophistication and detail. Biology studies include the life cycle of plants and their relationship to soil, water, and air, as well as basic anatomy and the life cycle of animals, fish, insects, and humans.

>>>(Biology before 7th grade? Man, do we have low expectations of our kids….)

Matter and energy are explored through the study of the properties of gases and solutions, combustion, magnetism, light, sound, and electricity. The earth and the universe are studied through weather and atmospheric phenomena, geology and erosion, and the movements of the heavenly bodies. By the end of the 6th grade, students have learned to design and execute simple experiments and to record and describe their observations.

>>>(And learning basic scientific techniques…even designing their own experiments…before 7th grade?  And we think we’re number one?  No way)

Music. Music is an integral part of the elementary school core curriculum. It includes singing, instrumental performance, and appreciation of both Western and Japanese music. From the 1st grade, children learn to play melodies and simple harmonies on small keyboard and wind instruments. They also receive formal instruction in reading music. Musical expression and improvisation of simple accompaniments are encouraged through the use of various percussion instruments. All children are exposed to a common core of Japanese and Western classical works, including Bach, Handel, Beethoven, and Schubert.

>>>( Music in SCHOOL?  Singing, music appreciation, AND performance? Instrument instruction and music reading?  Including CLASSICAL?  Gawd, we’re such a barbaric, uncultured nation….)

Arts and handicrafts. The Japanese arts curriculum provides an organized approach to the acquisition of some fundamental artistic skills and to the process of artistic creation. Instruction in drawing and painting proceeds from the use of pastel crayons to the use of watercolors in the upper grades. Training in formal composition and the use of special techniques such as perspective, depth and dimension, and light and shadow begins in the 3rd grade.

>>>(Are you starting to feel deprived right about now? Aren’t you ashamed of what we’ve allowed our schools to degrade to? And we expect to keep our current world position?  Pipe dreams…)

Printmaking starts with paper prints in the 1 st grade and culminates in carved woodblock prints in the 5th and 6th grades. Sculpture is approached in a similar fashion. Beginning in the 3rd grade, students are taught to make preliminary sketches and later to draw plans or make models for objects they wish to construct.

>>>(You do realize that the Japanese get by 6th grade what American student MIGHT get by high school, if then)

Homemaking. In the 5th and 6th grades, Japanese boys and girls receive 2 hours of instruction per week in basic homemaking skills. The goal is to deepen children’s appreciation of and participation in family life. Children practice basic meal planning and learn how to prepare and serve simple foods. They learn to take care of their own clothing, including hand washing of various articles, sewing buttons, and mending seams. They also practice making simple articles like bags and aprons and decorating them with simple embroidery.

>>>(What we used to call Home Economics….in high school. Why do the Japanese feel it’s important to teach kids how to do the basic life skills and we feel fine just tossing our kids into the world, unprepared in many cases.)

Physical education. The Japanese value sports and exercise, and the government actively promotes lifelong sports activities. The goals of the elementary school physical education curriculum are to help children learn to enjoy games and physical exercise, grow in strength and perseverance, and develop athletic skills, as well as become knowledgeable about achieving and maintaining good health.

>>>( Phys Ed….we still have Phys Ed?)

The sports program includes track and field activities, marching and drill, soccer and basketball, gymnastics and dance. Swimming instruction is common, and three-quarters of all elementary schools have a pool.

>>>(3/4ths of ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS HAVE SWIMMING POOLS….and our high schools might have one…maybe.)

By the 6th grade the majority of Japanese children are competent and confident in the water. In the cold and snowy areas of the country, ice skating is encouraged during the winter months on rinks created by flooding portions of the school grounds.

>>>(ice skating too?  Boy are we slackers.)

Health also receives considerable attention. The School Health Law provides for annual physical examinations for all students. The health curriculum emphasizes proper nutrition, traffic safety, and a healthy lifestyle. In the 5th grade, students study physical growth and the changes associated with puberty.

>>>(School provided physical exams…a health curriculum…*sigh*)

Moral education. Although occupying only 1 class hour per week, moral education has a fundamental role in Japanese education. It is a distinct area of instruction at every level of compulsory education, and attitudes, habits, and behaviors which are consistent with the Japanese value system are infused throughout the curriculum.

>>>(Moral education? We still have morals in theU.S.? )

The Japanese concept of moral education is far from vague or formless. Twenty-eight themes in six categories are covered at the elementary level, among them:

importance of order, regularity, cooperation, thoughtfulness, participation, manners, and respect for public property;
Endurance, hard work, and high aspirations;
Freedom, justice, fairness, rights, duties, trust, and conviction;
The individual’s place in groups such as the family, school, nation, and world;
Harmony with nature and its appreciation;
Need for rational and scientific attitudes toward human life.

>>>(Teaching kids that…and before 7th grade…and we wonder why OUR kids are the way they are…)

In addition to the prescribed content, each school annually identifies two or three central goals in moral education to be emphasized during the year. For example, in 1985, one elementary school chose thoughtfulness and endurance as its foci and requested all teachers to collaborate in reinforcing these. Individual teachers, too, often develop goals for their own classes in addition to the school’s goals. While teachers do not necessarily share a single view of moral education, they readily accept their responsibilities in this curriculum area.

Unlike other subject areas in the curriculum, no textbooks are used in moral education. Many teachers use educational television programs expressly developed for moral education, as well as commercially available materials, to promote student discussion on moral issues. There is considerable latitude in this area for teachers to develop their own approaches.

Special activities. Special activities occupy approximately 10 percent of the elementary and secondary school program: 1 hour per week for the 1st-3rd graders and 2 hours per week for the 4th-6th graders. These activities include all-school events such as sports and cultural festivals, excursions, and ceremonies, as well as pupil activities such as classroom meetings, student council meetings, and club activities.

Many of what are termed “special activities” in Japanese education are similar to those categorized as extracurricular activities in American education. However, in Japan these activities are more closely integrated with the formal curriculum, tend to involve all students, and are directed more toward character development. The overall objective is to use these experiences to promote the internalization of cultural values and to cultivate attitudes and habits which lead to the individual’s responsible contribution to cooperative group effort.

>>>(In other word, it’s learning how the individual contributes and fits into the group effort.)

Home-school relations and home environment

The Parent-Teacher Association is an important locus of activity for parents involved in the school life of their children. Mothers are expected to attend PTA meetings. The PTA functions as a forum for the school to explain its policies and expectations to parents and to organize parental assistance for school activities. It rarely contradicts the school’s administration. In addition to meeting in large, all-school forums, parents meet as a group with the classroom teacher. Annual PTA dues range from about $9 at a public elementary school to about $30 at a private high school. [15]

>>>(In other word, the PTA acts as a place for the school to explain to parents what is expected from both them and their kids and the rules of the school. It also gets parents to help with the school activities, like the Culture Fair.)

During the first weeks of school every year, teachers visit the home of each of their pupils to understand the family situation and study environment.

>>>(Knowing this helps the teacher with students that might be doing poorly due to home situations.)

Parents visit and observe the classroom and consult with teachers on specific days that are scheduled for such meetings.

>>>(This lets parents see how the teacher teaches.)

Parents are guests at the various festivals and ceremonies held throughout the year.

Schools not only train children in the norms and routines of school behavior, but are also responsible for teaching children habits expected in the adult world, such as punctuality, neatness, and respect for authority. Japanese parents support this function.

>>>(Bet schools here wish they got that support.)

The school is not reticent about communicating to parents its beliefs regarding proper parental roles in education and child rearing. For example, schools often set boundaries for children’s movements within the neighborhood or recommend evening curfews. During summer vacation, the PTA newsletter typically contains guidelines for parents on the times the children should get up and go to bed and when and how long they should study.

>>>(Again, something needed here. Judging by the kids, parents today need guidelines to help them parent properly.)

Studying is encouraged and supported in the Japanese home. Ninety-eight percent of all elementary school children have their own desks in designated study areas. [16]

>>>(Bet that statistic is reversed here…*sigh* )

Many mothers work with their children on a daily basis, helping with homework or drilling on lessons to be learned. Inexpensive home study guides and drill books for all grade levels and subjects are available at local bookstores. These are designed to supplement the government approved texts and are indexed to pages and chapters in the official texts.

>>>(Again, something that can ONLY be done with a standardized, national school system.)

The mother-child bond provides strong emotional support for the child, particularly in the upper grades, as the child becomes progressively more aware of the importance of academic achievement and the severity of education competition. The mother reinforces this awareness by encouraging the child to study and inducing the child to realize that academic success is important to her and of great concern to the family.

>>>(Something that is sadly lacking here….)

Educational pressures

The Japanese elementary curriculum is cumulative and demanding. At each grade level, children are required to learn large quantities of new material and proceed quickly from one new concept to the next. Although most children manage to keep reasonable pace with the instructional objectives, some fall behind. The plight of children who have fallen seriously behind in their studies is much discussed in Japan. These children are termed ochikobore, literally, those who have “fallen to the bottom” of the system. Although detailed evidence is scarce, the problem clearly exists and receives considerable sympathetic attention in the mass media and from the public.

>>>(No system is ever perfect. One can strive to promote and expect high…or can slow down and expect much less. Do you fail more by going for high expectations…or by low expectations? Which is better for the nation and the kids? )

Some evidence regarding the extent of the problem is found in a recent comparative study of reading achievement among 1st and 5th-grade children in one city in Japan, one in Taiwan, and one in the United States. Results for the Japanese sample showed that although most children enter 1st grade well prepared in reading, by 5th grade a significant number of them have fallen seriously behind. [17] Four months after entering 1st grade, 86 percent of the children in the sample were reading at 2nd grade level or above. However, over the next 4 years this initial lead in reading sharply diminished. When tested in the 4th month of the 5th grade, only 27 percent of the children were still reading above grade level, while 25 percent had fallen 2 or more years behind. Ten percent were reading at only lst or 2nd-grade levels. Two important findings of this study by Harold Stevenson and his collaborators were: “There are Japanese children with serious difficulties in learning how to read, and the severity of their problems is at least as great as that of American children. [18]

>>>(My question here is: Is this result due to curriculum, or the difficulty of learning the Japanese language? It might be comparing apples to oranges.)

A demanding curriculum and the small amount of remedial attention in school are not the only causes of ochikobore. As in all countries, there are diverse reasons why some children have difficulty keeping up with their schoolwork. Differences in intellectual ability, family environment, and personality characteristics are among the familiar factors which account for the variation in academic achievement. The lack of individualization of instruction compounds the plight of the slow learner or those with other scholastic problems. Although some teachers do provide individual assistance outside of class time for the slowest learners, the burden of remedial education falls directly on the family.

>>>(And there is where the responsibility should lie. Public education can only do so much regarding individuals. The system is charged with educating the public. If tutoring and/or private classes can be done by the school AFTER normal classes, then go for it.)

Parents concerned with maximizing their children’s chances for success in school and in subsequent higher education and employment provide whatever help with homework they can and then pay for outside assistance as necessary. In Japan this usually takes the form of either hiring a private tutor or, more commonly, sending the child to juku. For many, juku provide the necessary reinforcement which enables Japanese children to keep abreast of the demanding curriculum.

Out-of-school education

In the elementary school years, juku attendance rates rise from 6.2 percent of all 1st grade children to 30 percent of all 6th grade children. [19] Attendance rates continue to increase through lower secondary school as well.

A 1985 survey of juku by Monbusho reports that half of the elementary school students who attend juku take one subject and almost 30 percent take two. The subjects most frequently studied are Japanese language and arithmetic. Just over 10 percent of all elementary school students attending juku study four subjects. In effect these children are studying the basic academic curriculum twice, once in school and then again in juku. It is interesting to note that about 25 percent of all elementary school students in juku are estimated to be studying English, although it is not a required subject in elementary school.

The majority of elementary school students who attend juku attend at least twice a week, but study for less than 1 hour at each session. Students in the upper elementary grades have longer lessons, although generally under 2 hours per visit.

At the elementary level, the majority of students are enrolled in either a catch-up or preparation and review program. For many children, the juku provide important educational services that complement instruction provided by the formal school system.

>>>(My question here is, are parents sending their kids to juku because the kids are that far behind…or are they sending them because they don’t have time/knowledge to help them at home? )

Children returning from abroad

Japan’s increasing involvement in the international community has created problems for school-aged children who go abroad with their parents and then re-enter the Japanese education system upon return. Not only have they fallen behind in such academic subjects as Japanese language, mathematics, and science, but they no longer display traditional patterns of behavior expected in Japanese classroom life. They are also at a disadvantage in preparing for or taking entrance examinations for high schools and universities in Japan. This makes overseas assignments a source of considerable anxiety for parents of school-aged children.

Many families faced with an overseas assignment for the father resolve the potential problem by having the mother remain in Japan with the youngsters so they can stay on course in the Japanese education system. Some families take their children with them initially, but send them home before the crucial high school or university entrance examination years. Continuity in school and with one’s group of classmates is considered important, especially when the examination preparation stages are reached beyond elementary school. The number of youngsters returning to Japanese elementary and secondary schools in 1982 was 9,600.

The Ministry of Education has taken steps to deal with the problems of students returning from abroad. In 1983, there were 74 full-time Japanese schools worldwide (including one each in New York and Chicago) and 95 Saturday schools (33 in the United States). Although these schools provide a basic Japanese curriculum, most returning children still experience difficulty in readapting to Japanese schools. Hence the Ministry of Education has also encouraged the establishment of special programs to assist in the reintegration of children who have returned from abroad. In 1982, there were 124 schools in Japan with such special programs, most of them located in Tokyo, Osaka, and the surrounding metropolitan areas. [20]

>>>(Ah, the corrupting influences of Western ‘civilization’)

16
Aug
11

Is Obama really just a DINO?

Could it be?  Might it actually be true?  Might our President, the head of the Democratic Party, be a…gasp…Democrat In Name Only? Does his actions the past three years hold signs pointing towards that unsavory truth?

Obama talks a good game, but has he really put forth any substantial plans concerning Democratic concerns? All I’ve seen is his passing the hot potatoes to Congress and telling them to put a plan together. Excuse me….but isn’t it the main purpose of electing a president from a particular party is so that he can put forward a plan that encompasses the concerns of the party and try to move them thru Congress, not the other way around.

He’s talked about shared sacrifice, but folded each time he could push the idea. He’s talked about jobs but has not put forth his plans. He talked about insuring everyone, but gave the insurance companies opportunity for massive profits. He’s talked about reining in Wall Street, but has done little. When conflict starts is seems Obama runs and hides. Where is the protector of the Middle Class and the poor? Where is the person with a bully pulpit that can constantly fight back against the falsehoods and misstatements….and yes, bald-faced lies?

It’s good to  be pragmatic and thoughtful, but as the leader of the Nation and the Democrats, there needs to be much more fight and engagement on the president’s part. It’s killing his approval ratings just sitting back and letting the GOP rant on. You can’t convince people of the correctness of your position if all they hear is the opposition.

President Obama needs to get a jobs plan out before the end of September and push for it loud and hard. He also needs to put forth a short-term AND a long-term financial plan for the Nation. Short-term needs to actually spend more on infrastructure and public works projects AND some aid for states and cities. He needs to put forth an energy plan as well.

AND ALL OF THEM NEED TO BE DETAILED PLANS STATING THE HOWS AND WHYS.

No more ‘frameworks’. The Nation needs to get substance…a full meal’s worth.

He may be pleasantly surprised at the responses he gets by taking bold steps instead of wimpy baby crawls.

16
Aug
11

The Failed Generation

Us. Yep, the Baby Boomers. The generation with the largest population. The generation that was given a booming nation. We failed. Massively. Pretty much completely. In just about every area.

Doubt it? Think hard.

Our roads and bridges are falling apart. Our cities and states are slowly going bankrupt. Our public schools are bad and getting worse. Our health system is broken. Our military is held together by volunteers that are being pushed past their limits, then are seemingly tossed aside when they can’t fight anymore. The poor are getting poorer. The Middle Class is vanishing. Universities and libraries are slowly shrinking. The ‘Free Press‘ ain’t free and it’s held by corporate interests. The Nation‘s credit rating dropped because of political infighting. Manufacturing is nearly extinct. Wages have been stagnant, if not moving lower for the past 12 years. And we have built and improved nothing for the future generations.

We failed.

We fail at nation building. We can’t even rebuild our own, much less another. We fail at learning from history. If people recalled the 1920’s, they might have seen things leading up to the 2008 crash. We fail at listening to other opinions. We fail at caring for those that can’t or are having difficulty caring for themselves. We fail at taking bold moves. Worst of all, we fail at leadership…from mayors to presidents to the U.N. Total Fail.

Republicans want to go back to the 1880’s or 1920’s with laissez faire government…and most likely the same results…Ressession or Depression. The ‘Free Market‘ has never been able to police itself. And when it decides on something, it is usually for the good of the corporation, not the Nation or the workers.

Democrats are pussies….wimps…spineless wonders.  Woody Allen or Wally Cox would fit right in…well, they might be a tad too forceful for this lot of Dems. Where is the fighting for the workers and the poor? Where are the Grand Plans? Where are the policies and plans that aid the majority of the nation and improve things? Did they finally die along with that grand congressional lion, Ted Kennedy?

Damn it, Dems.  Get some balls…a spine..a fire in the belly…a fighting spirit. We need Mr. Smith, not Casper Milquetoast.Republicans have no problem standing up for their ideas, why does it seem that Democrats are avoiding their ideas?

Face it, look around you. Are we leaving things better for our kids? Did we improve live and conditions for a majority of the nation? Are more people living better lives? Are we really as free as we were before the 70’s?

We ARE the FAILED GENERATION.

09
Aug
11

Still here…Just Overheated.

Sorry about the extended absence, but without a/c, it just got too miserable to do ant good thinking or writing. Now that there is a break, I should be posting a few things this week.  Thanks for reading.

 

Sidelined Buddah

Chris Butkevicius

22
Jun
11

Japanese Education Pt.5 Preschool

Home, Family, and Pre-Elementary Education

Formal pre-elementary education

Reference to table 7

Teachers and school environment

Curriculum

Nonformal early education

Preschool and family

Pressures on pre-elementary education

Home, Family, and Pre-Elementary Education

Japanese families are stable. Divorce
rates have increased since the 1960’s, but remain relatively low. In 1980 the
number of divorces was 1.2 per thousand people, while the comparable figure for
the United States
was 5.2 per thousand. [1] Just 6 percent of all Japanese families
are headed by a single parent. [2]

>>>(Care for another reason why the Japanese do
better than us in education? )

Roughly half of all households in Japan are made up of a two-parent
family and children. This typical family unit is smaller and more urban than
that of a generation or two ago. More than half the population now lives in
large urban areas, and only one family in six includes three generations. [3]

>>>( As here, more autonomy for the parents, but
less flexibility when it comes to helping with the children. Yes having nana
living with you is a tad inconvenient, but it makes up for it when it comes to
the kids.)

Most homes, apartments, and condominiums are smaller than
their American counterparts because of the high cost of urban land.

>>>(Smaller, and easier to keep an eye on the kids
.)

For the most part, residences are comparably modern and are
filled with common consumer products. Most Japanese children grow up taking
television and the latest toys and gadgets for granted.

>>>( No difference with us there.)

There is a strong consensus regarding roles and the
appropriate division of labor within the family. A man’s primary focus is the
workplace, which often includes extensive work related socializing with male
colleagues during the evening hours. In contrast, a woman’s primary focus is
her home and family, with particular attention to the rearing of children. The
family-centered role of women is reinforced by their relative lack of long-term
career opportunities outside the home.

>>>( A conservatives’ dream.)

While most Japanese subscribe to the view that a woman’s
place is in the home and that work should not interfere with her primary
responsibilities to children and husband, women nevertheless make up almost 40
percent of the labor force. More than half of these women are married. [4]
Many mothers with small children work only part-time so they can be at home
when their children are not in school. The extra income generated by mothers
working outside of the home is often used to help meet the cost of their
children’s education. [5]

>>>( In other words, our dream family of the 30’s,
40’s and 50’s.)

Spouses generally agree about their respective parental
roles and share a belief that the children are at the center of their marriage.
Thus, the education of children becomes one of the most important family
functions.

>>>( And it should be. Parents ARE responsible for
building the foundation of their kid’s futures.)

In earlier times, Japanese fathers were regarded as severe
and as having great authority. Indeed, there is an old Japanese saying that
there are four things to be feared in life–earthquakes, thunder, fire, and
fathers. Mothers may indicate to children that father will discipline them if
they do not behave, but it appears that the father’s authority in child rearing
has decreased over the past generation.

>>>( As they moved into a more ‘Western’
lifestyle)

In many white collar families, the father is a proverbial
“guest” in his own house, returning home most evenings after the
children have gone to bed.

>>>( Sound familiar? )

Although fathers
provide children with certain role models and many take an active interest in
education matters, the task of attending to the child’s upbringing and
education is usually left to the mother. Mothers take that responsibility
seriously. Research indicates that Japanese mothers place the subject of
child rearing at the top of their worry list. [6]

>>>( The traditional, and natural, instinct for
mothers. They are most concerned with their child’s safety and future.)

Mothers and their children are especially close. Japanese
mothers seldom confront their preschool children. Rather, they attempt to
appease the child and foster an intimate, dependent relationship. The purpose
of this approach is to get the child to comply willingly with the mother’s
wishes and to shape behavior gradually over the long term.

>>>( It’s easier to get kids to behave if they
actually WANT to rather than if they’re FORCED to.)

Another goal of early training is to instill in the child a
deep sense of responsibility to the mother and family. This becomes an
important factor in developing motivation for school achievement in Japan.

>>>( ‘Win one for the team.’ It becomes important
and a major motivator to feel like mom and family ‘need’ and/or ’depend’ on the
child doing well and giving a good impression of the family to others.)

The Japanese believe that the home should be a relaxed
place where children are free of constricting requirements for emotional
control and good behavior expected in formal social situations.

>>>(In other words, at home kids can generally be
themselves…once the chores and homework are done.)

Early childhood training includes attention to manners and
proper social behavior required outside of the home, but there is little actual
exposure to group situations beyond the family until the preschool experience.

>>>( Kids are taught early on what is expected of
them outside the home. You can do what you want while at home, but outside, you
WILL act properly.)

Much of a mother’s sense of personal accomplishment is tied
to the educational achievements of her children, and she expends great effort
helping them. In addition, there is considerable peer pressure on the mother.
The community’s perception of a woman’s success as a mother depends in large
part on how well her children do in school.

>>>( If the kid’s succeed and does well, Mom is a
success and did well. If the kid isn’t doing well, Mom needs to put in more
effort)

Some Japanese mothers have gained a reputation for
extraordinary concern and involvement with their children’s education. Stories
about overzealous mothers abound. In part, this phenomenon may stem from the
sharply defined role distinction between spouses. Indeed, some Japanese note
that fathers should shoulder a fair share of the blame for these maternal
excesses, since the father’s typical preoccupation with matters outside the
home forces the mother to bear near total responsibility for managing the
education of the children. [7]

>>>( If Mom’s reputation is based on the ENTIRE
responsibility for their children’s education, Mom is going to do everything
she can to make sure her reputation remains as high as possible.)

Formal pre-elementary education

The initial transition from indulgence at home to the
institutional demands of formal education constitutes a radical change in
environment for the Japanese child. The difficulties are resolved for most
children through some form of preschool experience, wherein the child is
socialized in the ways of a group. The transition from the more or less
self-centered focus of home life to the shared needs and group responsibilities
of school life occurs through the socially oriented preschool experience. [8]

>>>( In other words, preschool acts as place to
learn how to act in society and learning how to find a place there, rather than
early formal education. They’re taught primarily social graces and teamwork,
not getting a head start on kindergarten.)

Japanese parents are strongly committed to early education,
though pre-elementary education in Japan is not a part of compulsory
education nor is it linked, like American kindergartens, to the formal school
structure. Virtually all Japanese pre-elementary education takes place in one
of two types of institutions: preschools and daycare centers. Preschools (yochien,
often translated as “kindergartens”), which operate under Monbusho
supervision, enroll children primarily between ages 3 and 5. They are in
session approximately 5 hours per day. Daycare centers (hoikuen,
sometimes translated as “nursery schools”), established by the
Ministry of Welfare, are primarily for the children of working mothers. They
accept children from infancy through age 5 and are in session 8 hours per day.
In most other respects the two types of institutions are similar in physical
facilities, curricula, teaching styles, and classroom activities.

>>>( Preschools, then are for ‘stay at home’ moms.
Not only to school them, but to give mom time to do things without needing to
watch the kids. Daycare is for working moms.
Note, both are under government supervision and have regulated
facilities and schooling. Not just a licensing procedure like here.)

A very high percentage of Japanese children are enrolled in
pre-elementary education. Forty percent of all 3-year-olds and 92 percent of
all 4 and 5-year-olds attend either preschools or daycare centers table 7. Japanese parents rarely withdraw
their children once they are enrolled.

>>>( So all most EVERY child gets
preschooling..hmmm)

Both types of pre-elementary institutions require tuition.
In the case of daycare centers, parents are assessed charges in accordance with
their income.

>>>( NOT one flat tuition fee…but an income based
tuition.  What a concept…)

In addition to
income from tuition, pre-elementary institutions receive subsidies from all
three levels of government in varying amounts.

>>>(That means they get funds from nation, state,
and city. There really needs to be a shift in this country)

Teachers and school environment

Japanese preschools are staffed by licensed professional
teachers.

>>>( PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS…NOT GLORIFIED
BABYSITTERS)

Virtually all are
women under the age of 25 who have graduated from a junior college. Their
preparation includes training in teaching as well as in relevant subject areas.
The former includes such topics as principles of education, child psychology,
and practice teaching, and the latter such things as music, physical education,
and the arts. Although serious and enthusiastic about their work, many women
leave preschool teaching after marriage in order to raise children of their
own.

>>>( Kinda makes sense. Teaching preschool gets
them advanced training for taking care of their own children.)

During most of the day, Japanese preschools and daycare
centers are relaxed, boisterous places. Parents and teachers prize high spirits
in their preschool children, and the yard and building usually resound with
enthusiastic voices and great activity.

>>>( As opposed to what happens here often. “Keep
quiet and behave. No running around. Sit down”.
Not there.)

Preschool classes are large by American standards,
averaging 30 students (and just one teacher) per class. [9]
This large class size is preferred by many Japanese teachers who believe that
it gives children an opportunity to learn to interact in a group and generates
more enthusiasm for the activities. Teachers refrain from overt direction of
group activities, preferring to encourage the class to learn to function as a
group. [10]

>>>(What is more important here seems to be
getting the children involved with each other rather than teaching subjects.)

Teacher strategies for gaining compliance from the child
and for inducing proper behavior have considerable similarity to maternal
strategies and techniques. That is, they emphasize persuading the child to
understand and comply willingly with demands for particular behavior rather
than forcing the child to obey.

>>>( Again, it’s easier to get kids to obey when
the WANT to.)

Teachers do not rush to intervene or correct occasional
misbehavior. They encourage other students to become involved in solving
problems. [11] Working through the group to resolve
individual behavioral difficulties is believed to be an important part of the
social curriculum, even at this early stage.

>>>( Nothing like peer pressure… and kids are more
likely to take advice from another kid than an adult.)

Curriculum

The curriculum of preschool is largely nonacademic.
Interaction with other children is stressed over interaction with materials.
Cooperative activities, games, freeplay, and chores form a substantial part of
each day. Children are encouraged to accommodate themselves to the activities
others around them. Great emphasis is placed on social development and training
in proper habits and attitudes.

Instruction in letters and numbers and other prereading
skills is absent from the formal curriculum guidelines set forth by the
Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Welfare. These guidelines contain six
content areas to be emphasized in classroom activities: health, social life,
nature, language, music and crafts. [12] Most preschools and daycare centers follow these
guidelines.

>>>( In other words, the basics of living in
society and transitioning from a home based lifestyle to a society based
lifestyle. They learn how to get along with each other, how to take care of
themselves, hobbies to enrich their lives, how to communicate and the world
around them.)

While explicit teaching of reading and writing skills is
uncommon , children are encouraged to speak and comprehend language by becoming
familiar with illustrated stories and picture books. Self-expression and the
correct use of spoken language are emphasized.

>>>( Hence the popularity of manga. They have it
from an early age and are encouraged to read them.)

In music, the children sing and become acquainted with
simple musical instruments. In most preschools, each class spends several weeks
preparing to stage a yearly show for parents and neighbors. Miniature
operettas, complete with costume scenery, and piano accompaniment, are among
the most popular presentations.

>>>(Now you know the reason for the proliferation
of J-pop, J-rock, and other Japanese music trends. Again, it starts early and
is encouraged.)

Traditional paper folding, or origami, is an
important element of craft instruction. Even 3-year-olds are considered old
enough to learn to make airplanes, boats, and cups. Older children learn more
sophisticated folding techniques, producing penguins, cranes, and a wide
variety of objects.

>>>( And we think our kids can only color in
coloring books and use blocks…sheesh)

Throughout Japanese pre-elementary education, children
learn to function as members of a group. Major goals are to interest children
in school and their classmates and to provide an order orientation to school
life. This focus on the group is carried throughout the school years and
ultimately into adult life.

>>>( You want to know WHY our kids seem to run
amok while the Japanese are civil? Here you go. Emphasis is NOT on the
individual, it’s on teamwork…working as a group for the benefit of all, not
just one.)

Although unrestrained voices and physical activity are
encouraged during play periods, the day is interspersed with brief periods of
solemn ritual when the entire class learns to stand quietly with attention
focused on the teacher. Children learn to distinguish among the various levels
of order and discipline appropriate at different times during the school day.

>>>( There is a season…)

Japanese pre-schools thus provide important preparation in
the habits and routines of elementary school life. Children learn to be orderly
and neat, to manage their personal school supplies, to take care of their
personal needs, and to wear school badges, hats, or uniforms according to
school custom.

>>>(They learn what they need to know in order to
start regular school running, not trying to figure out what they need to do and
how to do it.)

Nonformal early education

Preschool and daycare institutions are not the only sources
of pre-elementary education in Japan.
Children often attend enrichment lessons in addition to preschool. Swimming,
gymnastics, and piano lessons are popular. Mothers believe that these lessons
provide enjoyable opportunities for their sons and daughters to be with other
children and to participate in physical exercise.

>>>( So instead of tossing a child into a P.E.
class cold, many get used to structured activity through lessons early.)

In comparison with typical preschool activities which
emphasize social skills, the enrichment lessons provide a more structured and
focused learning experience. The Suzuki method of music teaching is one example
of these types of lessons. Such lessons are the forerunners of similar
out-of-school enrichment classes and related remedial and cram courses which
become more widespread during the later elementary and secondary school years.

Preschool and family

The close nature of the mother-child relationship and the
strong cultural and parental commitment to education enable the mother to
provide a strong foundation for the child’s entry into elementary school.

During the preschool years, mothers provide informal
learning opportunities such as drawing, making simple toys with paper, paste,
and scissors, and various activities related to basic reading and counting
skills.

>>>(Oh the memories of arts and craft time. Yes it
mean actually interacting with your kid, but you just might find out how much
fun it was and enjoy it.)

Most mothers
encourage their child’s natural interest in letters and numbers, although few
undertake a concerted program of instruction in reading and writing. By
answering questions, purchasing readily available children’s magazines and
activity books, and playing traditional letter recognition and phonetic
children’s games, mothers stimulate their children’s interest in basic reading
skills.

>>>(OOOO..flash cards, phonics, reading books and
magazines…and actually TALKING TO YOUR KID. Taking an interest in their
interest and actually ANSWERING their questions.)

This preschool home
environment is largely responsible for the fact that many Japanese children
enter the 1st grade already able to read and write the 48 basic Japanese
phonetic symbols.

>>>(HELLO PEOPLE.
IT’S NOT THE PRESCHOOL THAT PREPARES THE CHILD AS FAR AS READING AND WRITING, IT’S
THE PARENTS)

An important outgrowth of preschool and daycare experience
is that Japanese mothers develop the habit of providing considerable assistance
for their children in the schooling process. Japanese preschools require a
large investment of maternal energy. Numerous articles such as book bags, lunch
box wrappers, and the like must be handmade according to certain
specifications. Each day the child must be personally taken to and from the
school gate or bus stop, often on the back of mother’s bike or motor scooter.

>>>(hehe
Not only are the kids taught how to act, so are the parents (mothers).
Parental involvement required right from the gitgo. Something to consider.)

Mothers are also directly involved with the school in
various ways. Each day the child carries a notebook back and forth between
mother and teacher which is alternately inscribed with notes regarding the
child’s health, mood, and activities at home and during the preschool day.

>>>(Daily communications between parents and
teachers from the start as well. No wondering about what’s going on on either
side.)

Usually twice a
month there are PTA meetings or mothers’ club meetings. There are also frequent
meetings of committees of mothers working on various special projects for the
school such as gardening and hot lunch preparation. With all of these
additional school related responsibilities, enrolling a child in preschool has
only a small time-saving effect for Japanese mothers.

Although daycare centers, which are designed for working
mothers, require somewhat less intensive involvement, they also require
considerable maternal participation.

>>>( Parents don’t just get to shove the kid into
school and forget about it. They’re ‘required’ to participate in their child’s
education.)

In contrast to many preschools in the United States, Japanese parents
never function as assistant teachers or aides in the classroom.

>>>( Leave the classroom to the professionals.
PERIOD.)

Their role is to
provide auxiliary support for the child’s activities and visibly to demonstrate
their support and interest. These parental–largely maternal–habits and
attitudes will be maintained throughout the child’s school career.

>>>( Wow…parental involvement in their child’s
education. Who’d have thunk it?)

Pressures on pre-elementary education

Pre-elementary education in Japan is beginning to reflect the
pressures of parental concern with academic achievement in the school years
ahead. A growing minority of parents are concerned that the traditional
nonacademic focus of the official preschool and daycare curriculum is
insufficient. They worry that their children may not be able to keep up once
they enter school. They see the pre-elementary years as crucial in giving their
children an academic head start as well as helping them develop social skills.
Thus, some preschools and daycare centers are beginning to provide instruction
in basic reading and writing skills.

>>>(Not a good sign….)

Another factor contributing to the gradual introduction of
explicit instruction in pre-elementary education is increased competition among
preschool and daycare centers to maintain enrolments. One successful way of
developing a competitive edge is through providing some instruction in
recognizing letters and numbers. Other preschools create distinctive programs
through weekly instruction in art, judo, calligraphy, or other special
subjects.

>>>( Ah…nothing like market pressures)

This trend toward introduction of academic instruction in
preschools is not regarded in an entirely favorable light by elementary school
officials and social commentators. Emphasis on academic training at this stage
is seen as interfering with proper development of children’s social skills and
daily habits.

>>>( Quite possibly correct.)

Further, it is
believed that having some children enter 1st grade with academic skills while
most have not had a comparable opportunity to acquire them causes teachers
difficulties that could be avoided if the entire group entered 1st grade with
no previous academic instruction.

>>>( Boredom induces irritation which tends to
actualize in class disruption)

Paradoxically, the children who have had the advantage of
preschool instruction sometimes endure difficulties of their own. Since
Japanese elementary schools do not separate students according to ability, the
better prepared students often suffer some months of boredom waiting for the
rest of the class to catch up.

>>>(Which also starts a feeling of ‘Why should I
bother? ‘)

The combination of more instruction in basic reading and
writing skills at home, virtually universal participation in preschool
education, and growing enrolments in enrichment lessons, have created an
increasing discrepancy between the official guidelines for pre-elementary
education and the actual experience and capability Japanese children bring to
the 1st grade.

>>>( Well, guidelines are just that, guides. If
conditions have changed, perhaps it may be time to investigate, review, and
adjust the guidelines.)

22
Jun
11

After Obama’s Speech….Big Deal. *sigh*

Too little. Why so slow?

There is no, NO reward for staying in Afghanistan any longer. Pakistan?  Nope. The people in Pakistan don’t trust us at all. In fact, they consider us their enemy. What is needed is a reset. We need to get out. Totally. For several years. We need to cut the aid to the government and let the Pakistanis get their government in order without using us as a boogie man.

And we need to get totally out of Iraq. We’ve done enough damage to all 3 nations. We need to get totally out and stop all aid until each country gets things settled without our influence.

As for terrorism, use the CIA, Interpol, FBI, our Allies intelligence to search out the terrorists. Armies can’t do that. It’s investigation and information gathering and analysis that is needed.

We need to get our troops home and put those resources where they are needed at home.

22
Jun
11

Mc Cain and Gates. WHAT???

Do they both honestly believe what they spouted yesterday? That we should really take it slow withdrawing from Afghanistan because of what happened when we withdrew support in 1989 after the Russians pulled out? Really?

First off, we should have stayed out of it. Al Qaeda and the Taliban got it’s biggest boost because we jumped in and armed and funded them. Bin Ladin might not have been the force he became if we would have let them fight it out with the Russians. Face it, we goofed…big time.

We were more concerned about the ‘RED MENACE’ than thinking about what happened after they left.

Best thing we cn do is get out…AND FAST. The people don’t want us there, the government we’re propping up is corrupt and two-faced, and…if you hadn’t noticed…we accomplished what we went the to do…Bin Laden’s kaput.

Hopefully Obama will announce 20,000 troops home by the end of this year and another 30,000 by the end of next year, By then they should have made plans with the remaining allied countries on how to get the rest out by the end of 2013.

Let Karzai tend to his own mess…we have more than enough to do right here at home.

19
Jun
11

Presidential Asperations?

Everyone else seems to be announcing their intentions to run
for President, so I might as well too.
Well…announcing my AVAILABILITY to run. I can’t afford to cross the
street, much less run for President. So, if the Greens need a body, or people
want to start a grassroots effort to place me as a write-in candidate…or any
third party.

 

I meet the basics: over 43 (I’ll be 53 in July)…and a
natural citizen AND I’ve got the birth certificate to prove it AND my hospital
is still operating. (Loretto Hospital in Chicago)

 

Let’s get the sketchy stuff over with. I’ve visited hookers
in my 20’s, tried pot AND inhaled…enjoy alcohol…currently owe state and federal
taxes from my cab driving days…currently on Social Security Disability…live at
the ‘Y’ (lowest rent around)…weigh 425 lbs. (yep..hello Chris Cristie. You’re
close to my size)…like most Americans, I’m in debt up to my eyeballs but
current…and need dental work. Oh, I’m also a lousy public speaker.

 

BUT…I will have my plan stated here on my blog. I will try
to get as specific as I can, but right now it’s summer and there’s no a/c, so
I’m lazy right now.  ; )

 

I will answer questions as precisely as I can and try not to
do the typical politician tap dance around them. I will listen to all sides of
an issue, but I’m hard to convince to change my mind…but I do if I’m shown good
reasons why.

 

Of course I’ll have the usual problem of any President…if
the voters don’t elect members to Congress that agree with my positions and are
willing to vote for them, nothing can happen without compromise…and in this
era, there is NO such thing. I refuse to give away the store to get a gumball.

 

I’m basically a Liberal, but can get moderately conservative
at times. I got the way I am basically because of my late dad’s insistence on reading.
I remember reading to my kindergarten class.
I used to ride my bike with my paperbag to the library and usually
checked out 20 books for the 3 weeks then returned them and got another 20…for
about 10 years.

 

My dad used to watch news, documentaries, and PBS. I
remember watching Firing Line and operas, most of the major networks’
documentary and news programs, loads of PBS, classical concerts and
operas…plays…wow..TV used to be more interesting back then.

 

Musically I got started on classical, folk, and big bands.
My dad loved WFMT and WNIB. He always had WGN on weekend nights for Rapchek and
Floyd Brown. He always tried to catch Those Were The Days and Midnight Special
on Saturdays along with Studs Terkle.

 

Now it’s WGN and TWTD along with Midnight Special and WXRT ,
college radio, NPR, WFMT. TV it’s WGN’s local news, PBS Newshour, BBC World
News, NHK World News, MSNBC’s prime time shows (Rachel Maddow is fantastic. A
fellow nerdy news junkie…with a GREAT sense of fun.) and Keith Olberman.  Of course the History Channel, Discovery,
Science, History International, WYCCW, Bill Maher, and Penn & Teller’s
Bullshit are standard viewing…or I surf…or put on Weather Channel as
background  ; ).

 

So, heck…this is more than you get from most candidates.
Like I said, I can’t do much, but if elected, I’ll try to raise hell for the
middle-class.

 

Chris Butkevicius aka Sidelined Buddah.

 

(if the candidate application is presented like above,
people could probably vote for Sidelined Buddah….and make it count.  Check your local election laws. )

 

p.s.  this is only slightly tongue in cheek….just
like most people running for President.
; )

19
Jun
11

Japanese Educational System Pt. 4 Teachers

Ok folks, here’s the good stuff….TEACHERS. Perhaps there might be a bit of a difference in how teachers
are seen in Japan and how they are seen in theU.S..  Ya think?

The Teaching Profession

Composition and qualifications of teaching force

Reference to table 6

Preservice education

Becoming employed as a teacher

Inservice education

Japan Teachers Union

Social and economic status

The Teaching Profession

Japanese teachers are an essential element in the success story. Japanese society entrusts major responsibilities to
teachers and expects much from them. It confers high social status and economic rewards but also subjects teachers to constant public scrutiny.

>>>(Right from the start. Society expects much from the teachers, but also respects and pays them in accordance with expectations.)

Because Japanese culture views the school as a moral community and a basic training ground for becoming a good citizen, teachers have broad responsibility for moral education and character development and for instilling fundamental Japanese values, attitudes, and “living habits” in students at all levels.

>>>( Of course the parents tend to side with the TEACHER there instead of with their ‘precious’ child. “In Loco Parentis” means
just that…in place of the parent. Teachers and parents are on the same side here. )

These responsibilities are equal in importance to the academic roles of developing student motivation and helping students meet the high academic standards required for success in secondary school and university entrance examinations.

>>>( Full Metal Teaching…hehe)

Teachers are expected to infuse cultural values throughout school activities and to be concerned about students’ lives both in and out of school. Their efforts and influence often extend into the home and the community.

>>>(Yes, home visits are standard in Japan. It is a shared responsibility and if the parents can’t come to school, teachers go to
the parents…as routine.)

Long an attractive profession in status terms, the appeal of teaching as a career has heightened further during the past decade because of a substantial increase in remuneration. The average salary of teachers is now higher than that of other public employees and compares favorably with salaries of other professionals in the private sector.

>>>(If you want the best, you better pay for the best. Teachers are paid in accordance with the expectations.)

The salary increase, coupled with the depressing effects of the 1973 oil crisis on industrial employment, led to a dramatic rise in
applicants for teaching positions. The total number of applicants taking prefectural appointment examinations nearly doubled between 1974 and 1975 (from 128,000 to 245,000) although the number of positions increased only 13.5 percent. The number competing for teaching positions reached its peak in 1979 and has declined since to the present level of about 200,000.

Competition for entry into the profession continues to be intense. The 200,000 applicants now vie annually for approximately 38,000 vacancies in the public school system.

>>>( What a great problem to have, eh? )

Composition and qualifications of
teaching force

In 1984, Japan’s school system was staffed by approximately 1,000,000 full-time teachers at the elementary and secondary levels. In addition, about 99,000 teachers served in preschools under the Ministry of Education, about 38,000 in schools for the
blind, deaf and otherwise handicapped, a total of about 50,000 in technical colleges, special training schools and miscellaneous schools, and another 128,000 in universities and junior colleges Table 6.

Teaching is one of the few lifetime professional career opportunities readily available to women in Japan. The percentages of women full-time teachers in each type of institution are:

All institutionsPreschools

Elementary schools

Lower secondary schools

Upper secondary schools

Schools for the handicapped

Technical colleges

Special training schools

Miscellaneous schools

Junior colleges

Universities

41.993.8

56.0

33.5

18.3

48.5

0.8

57.4

40.5

39.1

8.5

Ninety percent of all new teachers now have 4-year college degrees, with most having majored in fields other than education. In 1985, more than 37 percent of the available positions in the nation’s public schools were filled by applicants having bachelor’s degrees from colleges of education while more than 53 percent were filled by applicants with a baccalaureate from other types of colleges. About 6 percent were filled by junior college graduates and the remaining 3 percent by master’s degree holders.

While most new teachers in recent years have had at least 4 years of university work, there are still substantial numbers of older Japanese teachers with less than a baccalaureate degree, as a recent study indicates:

In 1983-84. . . approximately 41 percent of elementary school teachers, 24 percent of lower secondary teachers, and 11 percent of upper secondary teachers had not earned bachelor’s degrees. . In contrast, 99.6 percent of all U.S. teachers, as of 1980-81, had at least a bachelor’s degree . . . In the same year, 56 percent of U. S. high school teachers, 47 percent of middle school and junior high school teachers, and 45 percent of elementary teachers held at least a master’s degree whereas the corresponding percentages in Japan in 1983-84 were only 4.9 percent, 1.1 percent, and 0.3 percent, respectively. [1]

>>>( Now this begs the question…if there is this difference in college degrees, but Japan seems to do
a better job, could it be that we’re not doing a good job at screening teachers right from the start?)

The Japanese elementary and secondary teaching force is more experienced than its American counterpart. In 1983-84, the average number of years of experience of Japanese elementary and lower secondary teachers was 16.8 and that of upper secondary teachers 17.5, compared with an average of 13 years for American elementary and secondary teachers in 1981 (the last year for which such data are available). Moreover, in 1980-81 more than 40 percent of the teachers in Japan had been teaching at least 20 years, compared with 22 percent in the United States.

>>>(This begs the question…does our system drive out the more experienced teachers…either to cut salary expenses or exasperation with a broken system? )

Preservice education

After World War II, the Japanese Education Reform Committee, following recommendations of the United States Education Mission, incorporated teacher education into the university system. This strengthened its academic component and led to a broader education, including the liberal arts, in a program not directly controlled by the central government.

>>>( This is the great irony. The U.S.had morethan a major influence in setting up the post-war educational system. It seems
the Roosevelt holdovers that went to rebuild Japan knew what they were doing.)

The Japanese term this approach the “opensystem,” meaning that faculties or departments in universities other than colleges of education, and institutions without colleges of education, even junior colleges, can develop and offer teacher preparation programs. By 1979, about 84 percent of all colleges and universities and 84 percent of the junior colleges were helping prepare teachers. [2] The more than 800 institutions involved in teacher preparation now graduate nearly 175,000 students annually with teaching credentials. This figure represents about  one-third of the total number of college and university graduates in Japan.
[3]

>>>( Interesting…84%…wonder what the percentage is here. And look…ONE-THIRD of grads get teaching credentials.  Bet that beats us by a mile.)

There are currently 65 colleges of education, of which 58 are with national universities and 7 with private institutions. These colleges are primarily engaged in preparing elementary and lower secondary school teachers. They produce 31,000 graduates annually, almost 18 percent of all who leave higher education having met certification requirements for teaching.

>>>( Seems that the primary education teachers are encouraged to attend the major universities. Teaching the basics seems to be of high importance.)

In 1985, more than half the college of education graduates were employed as teachers (46 percent in the public schools and another 9 percent in private schools). However, most teachers received their preparation in other than colleges of education. The proportion of those hired who were not graduates of colleges of education increased with school level: they filled one-third
of the openings at the elementary level, two-thirds at the lower secondary level, and nearly nine-tenths at the upper secondary level.

There are different legal requirements for certification to teach in preschool, elementary school, lower secondary school, and upper secondary school. For preschool, elementary, and lower secondary teachers, the basic qualification for a first class certificate is a bachelor’s degree. The basic qualification for a second class certificate is 2 years of study (the acquisition
of 62 credits) in a university or other postsecondary institution. For upper secondary school teachers, the basic qualification for a first class certificate is a master’s degree. The qualification for a second class certificate is a bachelor’s degree. The first class certificate is now the preferred credential at all levels.

>>>( Standards…always standards.)

In addition to the length of study and degree qualifications, prospective teachers must earn a prescribed number of credits
in education studies and in the subjects to be taught. At the secondary level, a larger number of credits are required for certain subjects (including social studies and science) than for a second group of subjects (including Japanese,
mathematics, and others). Table A shows the basic qualifications and the number of credits in professional education subjects and in teaching subjects required for first class and second class teaching certificates at each of the four school levels.

>>>( Not only a degree, but a degree with certain requirements.)

Table A. Requirements for
Teaching Certificates*

Teaching

Certificate

Requirements

Basic Qualification

Credits

Professional

Education Subjectsa

Teaching

Subjects

PreschoolFirst Class

Second Class

Elementary

First Class

Second Class

Lower secondary

First Class

Second Class

Upper secondary

First Class

Second Class

Bachelor’s degree

2 years postsecondary study, 62 credits

 

Bachelor’s degree

2 years postsecondary study, 62 credits

 

Bachelor’s degree

2 years postsecondary study, 62 credits

 

Master’s degree

Bachelor’s degree

28

18

 

32

22

 

14

10

 

14

14

16

8

 

16

8

 

40bor 32c

20bor 16c

 

62bor 52c

40bor 32c

*Actual requirements set by the training institutions themselves can be higher. The requirements of national colleges of education range from 124 credits (the total number normally earned in 4 years) to 159 credits. To obtain more than one teaching certificate, students usually take even more credits, averaging between 160 and 180 and exceeding 200 credits in extreme
cases.

aIncluding 2 credits, equivalent to 2 weeks, for student teaching, in both secondary education programs and 4 credits, equivalent to 4 weeks, in the elementary program.

b To teach social studies, science, homemaking, industrial arts, and vocational education subjects.

c To teach Japanese, mathematics, music, art, physical education, health, English and religion, and to provide guidance and
counseling.

A typical 4-year course for elementary and lower secondary school education majors in a national college of education includes the following credits:

Elementary

Lower secondary

General education

Humanities

Social sciences

Natural sciences

Foreign languages

Physical education

Teaching subject

Professional education studies

(including social and

philosophical foundations

of education, psychology

of education, child

psychology, moral education,

teaching methods,

practice teaching)

48-52

12a

12a

12a

8-12

4

16b

32-36d

48-52

12a

12a

12a

8-12

4

40-50c

18-26e

a Minimum.

b Legally required number of credits.

c Legally required number is 32 for one group of subjects and 40 for the remaining group of subjects.

d Legally required number is 32.

e Legally required number is only 14, including 2 credits in practice teaching. National colleges of education require an average of 4-5 credits in practice teaching in the lower secondary education program.

Minimum requirements for student teaching are 4 weeks (4 credits) for the elementary program and 2 weeks (2 credits) for secondary. However, national colleges of education require students preparing to teach in lower secondary schools to have at least as much student teaching experience as those preparing to teach in elementary schools. Since 1954, certification
requirements for work in the areas of academic specialization have increased while requirements in the professional education component have decreased.

>>>(Hmmm…specialized areas.  Ya mean the teachers are expected to know the subject they teach? )

Becoming employed as a teacher

While minimum requirements for teacher certification are determined by national law, prefectural boards of education may add
requirements.

>>>( In other words, there is a stated national requirement. States (prefectures) are able to increase the requirements…but not
reduce them.)

A prospective teacher meets the formal academic requirements through successful completion of prescribed courses of study in a
postsecondary institution. However, no matter how good one’s academic record may have been, graduation from a university is not sufficient for appointment to a teaching position.

>>>( A teaching certificate does not mean you’ll automatically get a teaching position. )

Most public school teachers are prefectural employees, even though three-fourths of them teach in municipal schools.

>>>( In other words, the States are responsible for teacher hiring and employment…even in cities.)

Prefectures, therefore, play a significant role in the selection of teachers for employment. In addition to completing required university coursework, a prospective teacher must receive a license to teach from a prefectural board of education. Such a
license is awarded on the basis of the prefectural board’s review of the work the applicant has completed in higher education. A license awarded by any prefecture is valid in all prefectures.

>>>( In other words, they passed the national requirements by passing a prefectural exam. It means they are qualified to
teach in all of Japan.)

However, the applicant must also take prefectural appointment examinations which help ensure that all applicants compete on equal terms for any teaching vacancies.

>>>( Again, the prefecture can add more requirements and all applicants for jobs in that particular prefecture have to pass that prefectures test.)

Given the attraction of teaching as a career and the intense competition for positions, passing the prefectural appointment
examinations has become a primary goal of aspiring teachers, one for which applicants work hard to prepare. The examinations are given in two stages. The first consists of written tests in general education and specialized fields and skill tests in such areas as physical education, music, and art. All applicants for lower secondary teaching jobs are required to take a test in physical
fitness. The second stage consists of interviews.

>>>( In other words, ya gotta prove you know your stuff…and you need to impress the bosses as well . )

Age is an important consideration. More than half of the prefectures require applicants to be under the age of 30. Only two prefectures have no age limit. This practice is more liberal than that of Japanese industry where, for white collar jobs and high level technical positions, large corporations typically recruit only new university graduates.

>>>( Basically this is due to the practice of hiring for life in Japan. They want you to start fresh in their system and get used to the way things get done there. People don’t move from job to job there like they do here.)

In 1985, graduates fresh from colleges and universities filled 59 percent of the new openings. The remaining 41 percent were filled by the previous year’s graduates who had failed the appointment examination the first time around and applicants with work experience in other fields. The latter had earned appropriate credits in education during their university study but had initially chosen to work in other fields. Now they were switching to education.

With more than five applicants for every position, prefectural boards of education can select able individuals from a large and diversified pool. However, no suitable data base permits comparison of the intellectual and technical competence of teachers with those who enter other occupations.

>>>( Bet school boards here would love that problem.)

Once applicants gain entry to the teaching profession, theyare assured of lifetime employment. They are promoted essentially on the basis of seniority, as in all public sector and most major private corporation employment. The seniority concept is strongly entrenched in Japan. The idea of performance-based merit pay is not a live issue or feasible option. Partly because of the lifetime employment policy, all prefectural and municipal boards of education are very careful in selecting new teachers. Dismissals are
extremely rare and normally occur only for unethical conduct.

>>>( In other words, applicants get the third degree and a thorough going over before they get hired. No..”Perhaps he’ll work
out”. You will be able to fit in or you won’t be hired.)

Teachers are rotated from one school to another within the prefecture on various schedules. This contributes to equalization of faculty resources among the prefecture’s public schools.

>>>( In other words, teachers don’t stay with one school for life…they move from school to school in the prefecture. Kinda
prevents getting stale and used to a situation.)

Inservice education

Need and types.
Continuing education on the job reflects Japan’s cultural commitment to self-improvement as well as a response to perceived weaknesses in preservice education. More than two-thirds of Japanese teachers who responded to a 1978 survey expressed the view that preservice teacher training was inadequate. [4] Prefectural and local boards of education are not wholly satisfied with
preservice teacher preparation either, and the Ministry of Education has reservations as well. Hence, Monbusho requires first-year teachers to receive a minimum of 20 days of inservice training during that year.

>>>( In other words, in a teacher’s first year, they will take at least 20 days of additional instruction in teaching.)

Under the direction of the Ministry of Education and prefectural and municipal boards of education, inservice training is offered
for public school teachers at all levels and at various career stages. It takes five forms in Japan:

Inschool training;
Informal inservice training
carried out by teachers themselves in district-wide study groups;
Training given at the local
(prefectural or municipal-equivalent) education center (see below);
Training given to principals,
vice-principals, and curriculum consultants by the Ministry of Education at a
national training center;
Two-year training given to a few
hundred teachers annually at three nationally funded institutions established
since 1978 for the purpose of providing graduate professional education for
experienced teachers. These teachers are selected from all over the country.

The three graduate institutions–Hyogo, Joetsu, and Tokushima”education universities”–were created by Monbusho because university graduate schools in Japan traditionally concentrate on preparing researchers and few offer relevant advanced study for practicing teachers. Teachers who complete the special graduate education program receive a master’s degree and return to the classroom. However, because of their small number of graduates, these three institutions have had only a limited impact
upon the teaching profession to date.

One of the commendable characteristics of the teaching profession in Japan is the extent to which inservice education is teacher initiated and directed. Teacher organizations also sponsor training and research related activities.

>>>( Teachers teaching teachers…)

Much of the 20 days of inservice training required of new teachers takes place in the schools where they teach and is carried out under the supervision of the shido shuji, expert experienced teachers on leave of absence from their schools to serve as the functional equivalent of what American education would call a master teacher, curriculum consultant, or teaching supervisor.

>>>( Cool concept. The best, most experienced teachers teach the first year teachers. Institutional mentors.)

Teachers, including novices, also participate in citywide study group meetings organized to discuss a variety of concerns including teaching methods and curriculum. One common training method is for teachers to conduct demonstration classes before their colleagues and a shido shuji, followed by feedback sessions.

>>>(Another cool concept. Peer review of your teaching methods with feedback. Good way to keep things sharp.)

Education centers.

A major source of inservice training is the local education center, which also provides counseling and guidance services and conducts some research. Each of the 47 prefectures and 10 large municipalities (with status comparable to a prefecture) has an education center.

>>>(Good idea.)

The Hiroshima Municipal Education Center is typical. It is financed by the municipal board of education and staffed by 28 full-time specialists (including five administrators), most of them shido shuji, to serve teachers and administrators in its area. In 1985, the Hiroshima Center offered 159 separate training programs in 21 different categories. Its programs last 1 to 5 days and cover such categories as subject matter knowledge, pedagogy, school administration, educational technology, student guidance, and class management.

>>>( In other words, programs are tailored to teacher’s time off. 1 day for in service day…5 days for study over a break or
vacation)

In addition to full-time shido shuji, the center training staff includes selected university professors and some community resource persons such as judges and industrial managers brought in as guest speakers. Japanese teachers and school administrators do not consider most university professors particularly useful in inservice training because of their relative
unfamiliarity with classroom instruction and administrative practices. [5] For their part, education professors question the approach of using other teachers and administrators to retrain practitioners at the school level. This difference in perspective helps sustain the controversy–now so familiar to Americans–over the role of higher education, particularly colleges of
education, in preservice and inservice teacher education.

>>>( Personally, I can see the usefulness of both. Teaching theory and putting that theory into practice needs two different types
of instructors. Using both provides expertise in both…professors for theory…teachers and administrators putting theory into practice.)

Various segments of the teaching force are scheduled for training on a periodic basis. For example, all sixth-year teachers are supposed to spend 3 days at the center for refresher retraining in selected aspects of their work.

>>>( Another good idea. )

There is also a program at the Hiroshima Education Center for school administrators, with emphasis on new principals. Administrators are expected to undertake training for 4 to 8 days a year. A typical training session consists of lectures, discussion, and case studies.

>>>( Again, a good idea.)

The center also offers a 6-month program for six selected teachers who work full-time on special projects of their own choice, and a 3-month program for 22 teachers who are granted released time from their schools to work on their projects.

>>>( Gives teachers that have ideas time to work on them)

Related concerns.
Prefectural boards of education urge teachers to use inservice training opportunities to master the holistic role of a teacher. The boards’ concern reflects the abiding Japanese cultural view that schooling is not only a cognitive enterprise for the transmission of knowledge and acquisition of skills, but also a vital process for developing morality, character, and basic life attitudes and habits.

>>>( Or how to form a good base of a good citizen)

Generally, inservice training at education centers and individual schools is believed to be successful. In a recent survey, two-thirds of the teachers who participated in center programs for the first time considered the training useful. [6] It is interesting to note that in Japan, in contrast to the situation in the United States, institutions that provide preservice education have little involvement in the continuing education of teachers. Further, while the level of inservice activity is high, little of it carries college credit or culminates in a graduate degree.

>>>( Not all bad, considering that the inservice training is basically paid for by the government)

Japan Teachers Union

No account of the teaching profession or postwar educational development in Japan would be complete without attention to the Japan Teachers Union (JTU), Nikkyoso in Japanese. The JTU is the dominant organization of educators (there are a number of smaller ones), the second largest public sector union, and a very influential member of Sohyo, the General Council of Japanese Trade Unions.

>>>( Ah yes, the needed balancer)

The JTU is a national federation of prefectural unions, each of which has considerable autonomy. The membership encompasses teachers and other education personnel at all levels, including college professors and clerical and support staff, in both public and private institutions. However, JTU’s members are predominantly teachers in the public elementary and secondary schools. The membership has declined in recent years. In 1985 the number dropped below 50 percent of all public school teachers for the first time since the union was established in immediate postwar period. [7]

The JTU has been an active force in educational and political matters for almost 40 years. It has been at odds with Monbusho on
most matters during virtually the entire period. The government has often been characterized as “conservative” and the union as “radical.” Neither label is necessarily helpful in cross-cultural translation.

>>>(And with proper negotiation, probably comes up with good decisions for all)

Shortly after the restoration of Japan’s sovereignty in 1952, Japanese education underwent a kind of “counter reform.” The national government regained much of its former power over the education system that had been curtailed by the Occupation. Nikkyoso, however, remained a strong proponent of many Occupation reform policies and thus was often in sharp conflict with the government. Some of the education issues about which Nikyoso continues to feel strongly include decentralization of control, school autonomy, freedom of teachers to write and chose textbooks, student centered education, greater teacher participation in decision making, and comprehensive high schools for all youths. The Ministry of Education has considerable interest in all these matters, but usually from a different perspective.

>>>( In my humble opinion, the success of the Japanese system is basically due to centralized control, standardized textbooks, and government oversight of schools. I do agree that teachers should have an equal voice in decision making, and high schools for all as we have here.)

Fundamental philosophical differences between the government and the JTU transcend the education sector. The government views teachers as neutral professionals who perform a duty for the government, while the JTU regards teachers as workers and participants in broad political and economic struggles. The JTU interprets its relation to the government in labor-management terms and takes strong stands on many government policies, including
sensitive domestic and international matters that have little or no relationship to education. [8]

>>>( Some things are common no matter where you are.  ; ) )

JTU is well to the left on the Japanese political spectrum. Its leadership has strong links to the Socialist Party. Some leaders are
members of the Japanese Communist Party. Thomas Rohlen provides this perspective on the situation:

The majority of teachers do appreciate the union: 1) for obtaining improved wages, benefits, and working conditions, and 2) for serving as a counterweight to right-wing influences and governmental authority. Even among those who find the union’s politics
offensive, there is general agreement with these points…. Most teachers are relatively liberal in their social opinions but rather conservative in their preference for orderly, smoothly run schools. [9]

>>>( In other words, more progressive action socially, but they see the need for a controlled school system to teach in.)

In brief, there is a long history of conflict between JTU and the government, with many complex political ramifications not readily or easily understood by those outside Japan. Many teachers have been simultaneously loyal to and skeptical of both JTU and the government. Nikkyoso continues to pursue its manifold interests in the current national debate on education reform.

Social and economic status

No recent survey adequately compares the prestige of the teaching profession to other professions and occupations. However, a 1975 Japanese study of social stratification and social mobility provides evidence on the situation at that time. It included relevant data on the prestige ranking of elementary and lower secondary school principals and elementary teachers [10]

According to the 1975 survey, elementary principals and teachers ranked 9th and 18th in public esteem, out of 82 occupations.
Principals’ prestige was higher than that of department heads of large corporations, public accountants, and authors. Elementary teachers enjoyed higher prestige than civil and mechanical engineers, white collar employees in large firms, and municipal department heads. University professors were ranked third, below court judges and presidents of large companies, but above physicians.

>>>( Gee, did teachers EVER rate that high here? )

It would be interesting to see what changes would turn up if a similar study were conducted today. While the criticisms of the past decade might well lower the ranking of educators somewhat, teaching in Japan clearly remains a socially respected occupation and an attractive career. The continuing strong competition in prefectural examinations–more than five candidates, most of them not education majors, competing for every classroom opening–dramatizes the continuing allure of the profession.

>>>( People actually WANT to be teachers.)

To be sure, the economic status of Japanese teachers is comparatively high, and the monetary rewards provide a strong incentive to pursue a teaching career. Yet this is a relatively new situation. As recently as 1970, a teacher with 20 years of experience earned much less than did the average worker in the private sector. [11] But by 1984, the beginning salary of a Japanese high
school teacher with a bachelor’s degree was 15 percent higher than the starting salary of a white collar employee with an equivalent degree in a private company, and 12 percent higher than the starting salary of an engineer with a bachelor’s
degree. [12] First-year teacher salaries are generally higher than those of other professions such as businessmen, engineers,
pharmacists, etc. At mid-career, their salaries are approximately equal. Beyond age 53, however, teacher salaries are again higher. The incentive to remain in the profession is strong because of the cumulative effect of seniority and generous retirement benefits. [13]

>>>( Again, to attract quality teachers, you need to provide quality pay)

A teacher’s total compensation is made up of a base salary specified in a schedule; a broad range of allowances, which are equivalent to almost one-fourth of the base salary; and an annual bonus equivalent to nearly 5 months’ pay (about 41 percent of the base salary). The allowances include provision for dependents–as is true in the public service salary schedules of many countries. Other factors being equal, a married teacher with children receives a higher pay than a married teacher without children or an unmarried teacher.

>>>( Discrimination?  Perhaps, but it also is a basic acknowledgement that married workers have more expenses than a single worker.)

The salary structure for public school teachers is established by the Japanese National Personnel Authority. While legally
applicable only to national schools, in practice this structure provides the model on which salary structures of public schools throughout the country are based. Local deviations are minor and variance among prefectures rare. Within this structure, there is one set of salary schedules for teachers in elementary and lower secondary schools and another for teachers in upper secondary schools.

>>>( A NATIONALLY set salary system….not a bad idea, considering almost all teachers are government employees. It also
equalizes areas. No poor area, rich area pay differences.)

The base salary of a Japanese teacher depends heavily on seniority. While the Japanese salary schedule starts lower than the typical schedule in the United States, it continues to rise after the U.S. schedule levels off. Unlike the salaries of American teachers, which tend to reach their peak between the 10th and 15th years of service, salaries of Japanese teachers continue to increase with seniority for 39 years–throughout the teachers’ careers. The salary ratio between a teacher at the top of the
seniority scale and a beginning teacher with the same training is approximately 3 to 1.

>>>(Scheduled raises…and keeping teachers around for a long time. Nothing beats experience.)

Salary is initially affected by the teacher’s degree and certificate level, but seniority counts more as years of service accumulate.
The differential between salaries of teachers with a master’s degree and those with a bachelor’s degree is initially about 17 percent. The differential between salaries of teachers with a bachelor’s degree and those with a 2-year degree is initially about 16 percent. In both cases, however, the differential diminishes to about 3 percent at the end of the professional career.

>>>( So, it DOES pay to get the better degree at the start.)

The following examples of annual salaries, allowances, and bonuses according to the 1985 schedule clearly illustrate the effect of
seniority:

A newly employed unmarried
23-year-old teacher with no dependents:

2.5-2.9 million yen
($15,600-$18,100)

A 40-year-old head teacher with
a spouse and two children:

5.3-5.8 million yen
($33,100-$36,200)

A 55-year-old principal with a
spouse and no dependent children:

7.8-8.7 million yen
($48,800-$54,400)

To finance retirement benefits, teachers contribute 8.87 per cent of their salaries and their employers (national, prefectural, or
municipal government) pay an additional 10.92 percent into a teacher retirement fund. Besides medical insurance and survivor annuities, the major retirement benefits consist of a lump sum cash payment and an annual pension:

Lump sum cash payment–All public employees are entitled to a lump sum cash payment upon retirement. A teacher retiring at age 60 would normally receive an amount larger than 2-years’ salary.

Annual pension–Teachers and other education personnel are eligible for retirement at age 60. The pension is a percentage of the last year’s total compensation based on the number of years of service. The basic formula is as follows:

Length of Service

20 years

25 years

30 years

35 years

40 years

Percent of Last Year’sTotal Compensation

40.0

47.5

55.0

62 5

70.0

For example, a teacher or principal who retired at age 60 after 35 years of service would receive 62.5 percent of his total compensation as an annual pension in addition to a lump sum payment of approximately $153,000 at the time of retirement.

A study comparing teacher salaries in Japanand the United States, recently completed under contract for the U.S. Department of Education, reports these major findings:

The average salary of Japanese
teachers and the average salary of American teachers were nearly equal in
purchasing power in 1983-84. The former, converted into “equivalent
dollars” on the basis of a purchasing-power-parity (PPP) exchange rate,
was $20,775 and the latter $21,476. This near equality between the average
Japanese adjusted dollar-equivalent salary and the average U.S. salary at that time is the result of two
factors: 1) the steeper Japanese salary schedule, and 2) the heavier
concentration of Japanese teachers in the highest seniority brackets where
Japanese dollar-equivalent salaries are higher than dollar salaries in the United States.
The dollar equivalent salaries
of Japanese teachers in their early years of teaching were below the salaries
of their U.S.
counterparts, but the salaries of senior Japanese teachers were substantially
higher than those of their American counterparts. The shift in relative
position occurs at about the 20th year of service.
The salaries of Japanese
teachers were substantially higher than those of U. S. teachers when related to
national indicators of per capita economic activity. The average teacher’s
salary in Japan was 2.4
times the per capita income, compared with 1.7 times per capita income in the
United States.
The average teacher in Japan
could buy a significantly larger share of their country’s goods and services
than could the average teacher in the United States.
The ratios of the average
teacher’s salary to the average wage in manufacturing, to average salary in
all nonagricultural activities, and to salaries in various other occupations,
are all higher in Japan
than in the United States.
[14]

Caution is required in using these comparisons because of the different conditions of employment in the two countries. The Japanese teacher works a longer school year than the American teacher. As a full-year employee, the Japanese teacher works when school is not in session and has shorter vacations than the American teacher. Teachers in Japan also have a wider range of functions than teachers in the United States. They assume many responsibilities that in the United States that are borne by counselors and curriculum coordinators, for example. And they apparently spend more time meeting with parents.

>>>( Not a bad trade off. The teachers and students get more time together and build a bit of trust when the teacher is also the counselor. And more time meeting with parents can provide both sides with insight into the needs and problems of each other and can build a partnership between teachers, parents and students. Kids can’t get away with as much if they know teachers and parents talk to each other often.)

Moreover, pupil-teacher ratios and class size are considerably larger in Japan than in the United States. For example, in 1982, the average elementary class in Japan had about 34 pupils and the average lower secondary class about 36. For the same year, in the United States, the National Education Association reports an average class size of 25 at the elementary level and 23 at the secondary level. [15] Home, Family, and Pre-Elementary Education

>>>(Gee, you mean my 1972 8th grade class of 52 wasn’t normal?)

03
Jun
11

Why just a border fence? Why not Something Useful?

A fence is SO easy to counter. You can tunnel under it. You can climb over it. You can cut a hole in it. Why bother? Why not consider something that would not only be much harder to get around, but also provide jobs, provide transportation, aid the military AND commerce, and possibly help with the yearly flooding problems? Why not build a Texas-Pacific Canal?

Right along the border on the U.S. side. A mile or so wide, one hundred feet deep, between the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean. (yes, I know about the Gulf of California…in order for it to provide TOTAL border protection, it would need to cut across the California peninsula) Locks wide enough and long enough to accommodate the largest supertanker, container ship, or aircraft carrier. Deep enough to discourage swimming and allow the deepest drafts. All under U.S. control. All within U.S. borders.

Panama can’t provide this. And what happens if Panama suddenly decides to refuse U.S. shipping passage? It’s a matter of National Security and Homeland Security.

Oh…the floods? Well, another massive project would run aqueducts from the Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio, etc. rivers, with  sluices in the levees one or two feet below flood level. When the rivers get high enough water would be able to flow into the aqueducts.

Oh…to where? Well, the Colorado river to replenish it and Lake Meade…Some to Atlanta and Florida and Lake Okeechobee to keep water in Atl and the Everglades…Some to Texas and the new canal…and some in filtering lakes in the Great Plains to help replenish the Ogallala.

One massive project….partial solutions to several problems. Jobs, drought, water table replenishment, flood control, border control, additional, more secure route for military and commercial shipping from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Not to mention possible ports for New Mexico, Arizona, and Southwestern Texas.

Think about it…it’s not that far-fetched an idea.

yours,

Sidelined Buddah

31
May
11

Ok…A Warning, eh? Here’s one we need to give Karzai….

“Here’s YOUR two-minute warning. You don’t like our mistakes that occur while we prop up YOUR corrupt and shaky government, YOU issue veiled threats towards us…we’re gone. Everything. Everyone. Every dollar of aid. By the end of 2011. Have fun.”

Seriously, we accomplished the Afghan mission when Seal Team 6 capped Bin Laden. There is no further reason for NATO to be there. It’s time to inform Karzai that by 12/31/11, NATO is gone. Everyone. Everything. Including the aid. Same goes for Iraq. It’s time to get ALL our troops out of there. Neither nation really wants us there. It’s time to keep those BILLIONS per DAY here and use it to reduce the deficit.

Karzai wants us out? Let’s get out. It’s shaky staying there anyway. Our main supply line runs through Pakistan…another ‘friend’ that doesn’t seem to want us around. Well, time to think about the safety of our troops AND our own best interests and leave. That also would allow the State Department to act properly with Pakistan and not need to worry about keeping them placated in order to keep our supply route open.

We STILL need to raise taxes on the wealthy, (see my earlier post on that) but this constant drain of money we can’t afford to waste needs to stop…ASAP.

yours,

Sidelined Buddah

31
May
11

Japanese School System Part 3

As the term “juku” gets a through explanation…(yes it’s long.  it’s a GOVERNMENT STUDY)

School after school

Juku

Academic juku

Attendance patterns

Teachers

Why juku flourish

Criticisms

Juku

Juku is the Japanese term for a large and diverse group of private, profitmaking tutorial, enrichment, remedial, preparatory, and cram schools found throughout the country.

>>>(Think Sylvan)

Most juku operate after school hours and on weekends. Juku parallel the official school system in a somewhat interdependent relationship. The Japanese scholar Kazuyuki Kitamura provides an insightful, though perhaps overstated, perspective on the relationship between juku and the regular school system:

The dominant values of the Japanese public primary school are egalitarianism and uniformity: Pupils are not classified according to their academic ability because all pupils are supposed to keep up with the progress of the class.

>>>(A opposed to our system where we tend to slow down the entire class for the slower students. They keep up the class speed and it’s up to the student and parents to keep up)

There they are taught by means of a nationally controlled, uniform curriculum. Despite its principles of egalitarianism and
uniformity, however, the school inevitably must produce high achievers and low achievers. The school and its teachers are unable to counter these disparities because they are bound by the two mandatory principles.

>>>(Which isn’t bad. It supplies the best education for the majority of the students. Our problem is that when teachers slow down the class’ progress in order to accommodate the slower students, the average and better students get frustrated and bored. That is one of the major reasons for our large drop out rate…student boredom.)

So  high achievers who are dissatisfied with the progress of the school class attend a school where they can take more advanced classes, while [students with learning problems can attend] another type of school offering remedial classes. Then, thanks to the existence of these. . supporting institutions, the formal school can continue to function according to the principles of egalitarianism and uniformity. [1]

>>>(So instead of trying to privatize the public schools by using charter schools or making the majority of parents angry because of the limited seats available in magnet schools, the government should create a national system as described earlier and regulate, license, and encourage both of the other types of after-school schools)

The juku can be categorized into academic and nonacademic. The latter offer instruction for general enrichment purposes in a wide variety of subjects such as piano, the arts, abacus, and calligraphy. They are more extensively attended by younger children. The academic juku are the more prominent kind and assume increasing importance with each successive grade level.

Academic juku

Academic juku are a response to several realities in Japanese education:

the need for supplementary instruction to enable many elementary and secondary students to keep pace with the demanding school curriculum,
the need for remedial instruction to help those who have fallen behind to catch up, and
the need for special assistance in preparing for entrance examinations for senior high schools and universities.

Academic juku offer instruction in school subjects such as mathematics, Japanese language, science, English, and social studies. They help students review and prepare for regular school lessons as well as advance to the next level through preparation for entrance examinations.

>>>( Note the list of subjects that they instruct on…look familiar? )

Many juku provide both kinds of services as well as remedial assistance for those having difficulty with their school studies. The yobiko is a special category of juku which specializes in preparing high school students and graduates for university entrance examinations. It is described further in the section on upper secondary education.

>>>(Our ACT/SAT test schools)

Academic juku vary greatly in philosophy, ownership, physical plant, and scale of operation. There are one-room juku as well as
chains, some with branches enrolling more than 1,000 students and employing a faculty of 50 or more. The major corporate chains have immense total enrollments–at least one has more than 1,000,000 students nationwide. Some juku have gained reputations as elite institutions in their own right, and some of these even have entrance examinations, although usually more for class formation than for student selection. The typical juku is operated by a private individual with one or a few teachers. The most common form is essentially a one-room, one-teacher school.

>>>(Talk about opportunities for enterprising teachers…)

The juku enterprise today is a recent phenomenon, paralleling the expansion and development of secondary and higher education. The growth during the past two decades has been dramatic. A national survey conducted in 1976 found that 60 percent of the juku had been founded in the preceding decade. Fully 70 percent of today’s juku have been founded since
1976, nearly half of them since 1981. Estimates of the current number of academic juku differ widely, but recent Japanese figures put the total at at least 35,000.

>>>( See, the Japanese are open to taking opportunities that open up…we should as well)

Attendance patterns

Juku attendance has risen at all grade levels in the last decade. [2] Participation rates increase with grade level throughout the entire compulsory school period. National average attendance rates rise from 6.2 percent of all children in the 1st grade of
elementary school to 47.3 percent by the 3rd year of lower secondary school, with figures for large urban areas even higher. The figures for attendance by grade level are given in figure 4. Comparable detail is not available for the upper secondary years, but the overall participation rate is lower, in part because almost 30 percent of the students are now in vocational education
programs and, thus, out of the university entrance marathon.

>>>(This goes with the importance Japanese parents place on academic achievement.)

Figure 4: Juku Attendance
Rates by Grade Level Through Compulsory Education

< src=”images/jed4.h1.gif”>

Except for 9th graders, during the compulsory school years more students are enrolled in either a “catch-up” program or one
which helps students review and prepare for regular schoolwork than in one geared to examination preparation and advancement to the next higher educational level. As students advance through the higher elementary grades and into lower secondary school, there is a tendency for more students to enroll in preparatory and examination programs. By the last year of lower secondary school (9th grade), half of those enrolled are engaged in courses which help prepare them for high school entrance examinations.

Juku also perform an important social function for young people, providing opportunities for contact with peers outside their regular school context. The most common reason parents give for sending their child to juku is that the child wanted to attend. Many youngsters ask to attend because their friends or other neighborhood children do. Almost 40 percent of the children who go to juku say that one reason they like going is because they are able to make friends with other boys and girls.

>>>(Another good reason to encourage development of a similar system. Peer pressure to attend.)

Juku operators, too, often point to the opportunity children have to make new friends outside the school circle as one of the
merits of attendance. Besides peer contact, many children see juku as a positive experience because they are able to have more personal contact with their teachers.

In listing the education benefits of juku attendance, about half the students placed “gaining a better understanding of school
work” at the top of their list. About half of all elementary and lower secondary school students report that their main reason for attending is “preparation and review” of school studies.

Teachers

Juku teaching is usually a part-time proposition, but many juku employ some full-time teachers. In many cases, it is the more senior and experienced full-time teachers who teach the critical examination preparation classes or the courses in a juku’s particular specialty. A juku’s faculty and reputation are strong drawing cards.

Approximately one-third of all juku teachers are university students.

>>>(An entry level job for future teachers)

About 4 percent are teachers in high schools or institutions of higher education.

>>>(Nothing like making extra cash doing what you’re trained to do. More time teaching, better teachers)

Only 1 percent are elementary or lower secondary school teachers (a decline from 6 percent a decade ago, reflecting strong Ministry of Education admonitions to regular full-time teachers against also serving as juku instructors). About half of the remaining faculty members earned a teaching certificate during their university study, but have no teaching
experience in regular schools. Some apparently prefer employment in juku. Others may have been unsuccessful in securing a regular teaching position.

Why juku flourish

Beyond meeting the three academic needs noted earlier, juku provide a socially acceptable way for parents to fulfill their educational responsibilities as the child advances to a point in schooling where they can no longer provide adequate assistance at home.

>>>(“I can’t help junior with his homework anymore…it’s too advanced” or”I don’t have time”)

At the same time, juku offer parents, particularly mothers, an opportunity for their children to receive additional educational and social benefits in a supervised environment after school hours.

>>>(And we’re ALWAYS looking for ideas to keep children off the streets…)

Few parents wish to deny their offspring the opportunity to attend juku when the children of other parents are attending. Some parents feel they would be derelict in their duty as parents if they did not send their children to juku. This tendency reflects the values of the parents, and in many cases, the children, in wanting to participate in an activity recognized by
peer groups as important.

>>>(Again, society has an important role in making the acquiring of knowledge equivalent to being a good athlete)

There are reports of neighborhoods devoid of children after school because the youngsters are all in juku. Some regular school teachers complain that children no longer stay around after school because they have to go to their juku lessons. A child who does not attend may have no one to play with and may therefore ask to be sent.

>>>( What a great problem to have…)

To some observers, juku represent an attempt by parents to exercise and by some educators to provide meaningful measures of choice in Japanese education, particularly for children attending public schools. Some juku offer subject matter not available in the public school curriculum while others emphasize a special philosophical or ethical approach. A small number feature programs that are almost Spartan in their demands, presumably appealing to parents who want their children to be exposed to the most rigorous standards of discipline and self-denial.

Most juku, however, differ from public school practice primarily in the extent of personal attention provided. Juku are not limited to standardized or lockstep instructional approaches, but may use whatever methods they believe are most effective.

>>>(In other words, let the ‘free market’ experiment with methods of education. Those that work will profit…those that don’t will change.)

Many juku pride themselves on approaches which emphasize individual attention to student needs. In sharp contrast to standard public school practice, some juku even stress individual recognition as a motivational device. The free market in which juku operate provides a strong incentive for improving instructional effectiveness: better instructional performance produces more fee-paying students.

>>>(Which is where most incentive belongs. The public schools are responsible for educating the majority of students to the
best standard they can. )

Class organization is one area where juku exploit their flexibility. Not being required to keep all students of the same grade
together, they often group students by ability rather than grade level. Some juku regroup students frequently on the basis of periodic assessments of progress.

>>>( Again, that is a better arena to do this in. Parents worry about self-esteem? Keeping a class together through their schooling helps. )

Some juku emphasize self-instruction. They may use a programmed instruction approach where the student progresses at his or her own pace. In these schools, classes typically consist of children working by themselves while sitting together in the same room. Many juku are run by dedicated teachers who feel quite strongly that they offer a valid educational supplement to the instruction provided in public schools. Some juku might even be considered a form of experimental school run by professionals who develop original curricular materials and innovative approaches to teaching and learning.

>>>(Of course, those approaches that work really well can always be integrated into the public school system.)

The juku industry has become a big business. It has reached the 800 billion yen level annually (about 5 billion U.S. dollars) and is still growing. [3] Because of the commercial aspect of most juku, some critics have argued that they have profit rather than education at heart.

>>>(Sound like the criticism of charter schools, eh? )

Juku operators acknowledge that their schools operate in the marketplace, but point out that they have a legitimate range of educational services to sell for which there is great demand. A sizable proportion of parents obviously believe that juku are providing services which the public schools do not provide, which the parents believe their children need, and for which
they are willing to pay. Parents are free to go elsewhere if a juku is not meeting their needs or living up to its claims.

>>>( And that’s why these are private, not public)

Criticisms

Since juku attendance costs money, not all students are able to obtain their services. Hence juku introduce some inequality into what is nominally an egalitarian education system. Yet while some juku are expensive, most are affordable for most families. Juku cannot afford to price themselves beyond the reach of their potential clientele.

>>>(What the market will bear…)

Japanese parents are very concerned about doing whatever they can for their child’s education. If the rising enrollments in juku are any indication, cost is not yet a limiting factor for most parents. Juku clearly are given some priority in family budgeting.

>>>( As is private school tuition here. If public schools met the same standards that the Japanese can, it might give the option
of going to a ‘juku’  for what the student needs instead of paying a full tuition at a private school)

Juku fees depend on the grade level of the student, number of courses taken, and the amount of individual instruction involved. In 1985 the average family with one elementary child attending a juku paid an estimated 2 percent of family income in juku fees. For families where children took four courses, the fees averaged about 3.5 percent of family income. For student of lower secondary school age, the costs averaged about 2.4 per cent of family income. Home tutors tend to be considerably more expensive, and the number of families employing them is only a fraction of those sending their children to juku.

Some criticism has been expressed that when juku teach material in advance of the time it is taught in school there can be a
disruptive and negative effect on the classroom situation. But recent studies do not substantiate this view. Rather, in some areas of mathematics, for example, students who have attended juku do better than those who have not.
However, in other areas of mathematics there is little or no difference in performance between the two groups of students. [4]

Occasionally some juku, especially those oriented toward examination preparation, have engaged in deceptive advertising or made false claims concerning their ability to qualify students to pass entrance examinations.

>>>( Ah..free markets…)

Other juku, anxious to enroll more students, have sometimes tried to steal away talented students or teachers on the theory that the presence of a particular “star” at their school would attract other students and parents. Such unethical behavior
has reflected on juku overall. However, most juku reputations are gained from legitimate achievements.

Maintaining perspective

Throughout the entire elementary and secondary school span, over half the parents do not send their children to juku, some for reasons of cost, but probably more because they do not have the need for juku. The latter group believes the schools do an adequate job and that such supplementary services and experiences are unnecessary.

>>>( If our public schools were performing as well as the Japanese, perhaps the call for charter and magnet schools would quiet
down. No need for special schools if THE ENTIRE SYSTEM provides an equal education across the board.)

Many of these parents also feel that children ought to have more time at home to play when young and that they, the parents, are capable of providing whatever additional assistance the children may need with their studies.

If a student is not in juku, it does not mean that he or she is necessarily at a disadvantage in school. Other avenues of assistance are available. For example, self-help literature or supplemental texts and study guides, some produced by publishing houses associated with juku, are widely available on a commercial basis.

>>>( And we DO love our self-help books as well…)

Most items are moderately priced, generally in the range of 5 to 10 U.S. dollars. There is also a complete Correspondence High School of the Air course broadcast almost daily on the Japan Broadcasting Company’s educational radio and television channels. These programs are essentially free for the listening and many students do, in fact, use them to supplement their studies.

>>>( In other words, NPR and PBS could be assigned an additional channel for this use ONLY. They can broadcast subjects from K-14 commercial-free. (Subject to the regulations of the school system, of course. They’d basically be classes-at-home)

In school and juku as well as in study at home, Japanese children learn good study habits, strong self-discipline, and persistence on school achievement matters. But Japanese children do not study all the time nor do juku function solely as educational institutions. Many children enjoy their lessons and friends in juku and have further social contacts with peer groups in clubs and other activities outside of study situations.

>>>( Networking..always networking….  ; )  ))

Japanese children watch television, read comic books, and enjoy pop music. But they clearly work hard on their education both in and out of school.

to be continued….

Sidelined Buddah

27
May
11

Japanese Educational System Study…Part 2

The continuation of the Japanese Educational System…Structure this time.

Structure

Reference to Table 1

Reference to Table 2

Reference to Table 3

Compulsory education

Upper secondary and higher education

Enrollment and advancement rates

Reference to Table 4

Reference to Table 5

Governance and administration

Finance

School year

Other dimensions of education in Japan

Structure

Japan‘s education system today has its legal basis in the post-world War II Japanese Constitution and national laws. The 1947 Constitution provides for free compulsory education for all children “correspondent to their ability.” Two laws passed in 1947, the Fundamental Law of Education and the School Education Law, provide the remainder of the basic legal foundation for the education system.

>>>(This indicates that the U.S.had a major role in forming the national school system of Japan since we were governing Japan
right after the end of WWII.)

The Fundamental Law of Education clarifies the aim of education and establishes national policy on such core issues as free compulsory education, equality of opportunity, and co-education. It sets forth the central importance of education in its opening lines:

Having established the Constitution of Japan, we have shown our resolution to contribute to the peace of the world and welfare of humanity by building a democratic and cultural state. The realization of this ideal shall depend fundamentally on the power of education. [1]

The School Education Law provides general regulations for the operation of the system at all education levels. In addition to provisions on establishment, staffing, and operation of all types and levels of schools, the law emphasizes the importance of creating moral and capable members of society.

>>> (In other words, a nationally controlled system)

Figure 1: Structure of the
Education System

<
src=”images/clip_image001.gif”>

The structure of the official education system is summarized in figure 1. Its elementary and secondary portion is organized along
the lines of the common American 6-3-3 model. The total structure includes the following types or levels of institutions:

preschools (yochien) and daycare centers (hoikuen).
6-year elementary schools (shogakko),
3-year lower secondary schools (sometimes called middle school, chugakko)–corresponding to junior high school in the United States,
3-year upper secondary schools (sometimes called high school, kotogakko)–corresponding to senior high in the United States,
schools for the handicapped (various terms are used depending on the type of school),
4-year colleges and universities (daigaku), many of which also have graduate programs,
2-year junior colleges (tanki daigaku),
technical colleges (koto senmon gakko) offering 5- and 5 1/2 year technical programs, which span the upper secondary and 2-year college levels,
special training schools (senshu gakko) offering vocational training at both the upper secondary and 2-year college level, and
miscellaneous schools (kakushu gakko) offering practical or vocational courses. (Note: This is the most variable institutional category, embracing diverse subjects for varying lengths of time at the upper secondary or postsecondary levels.)

Japan has both public and private schools at each level of education. There are few private schools for the 9 compulsory grades, but the private sector becomes increasingly significant at the upper secondary and postsecondary levels. Public schools fall into two categories: national schools, established and funded by the national government, and local public schools, established by either the prefectural or municipal government and funded by all three levels of government.

>>> (Notice, no single local government funds schools. It’s either nationally funded, or funded jointly by city, state, and nation)

Table 1 shows the total number of education institutions of each type by administrative category: national public, local public (prefectural and municipal), and private. Table 2 shows total enrollment by type of school and percentage distribution by administrative category. Table 3 shows enrollment by type of school and gender.

>>> (Remember, Japan is approximately as large as the state of California…so comparisons between the two might be better than using totalU.S. numbers.)

Table 1. Number of Schools
by Type and Control:

May 1985

Type Total National Public [The link bar feature is not available in this web][The link bar feature is not available in this web]

Local Public

(prefectural and municipal)

Private

Number

All schoolsPreschools*Elementary schoolsLower secondary schoolsUpper secondary schools

Schools for the blind, deaf and otherwise handicapped

Technical colleges

Junior colleges

Universities

Special training schools

Miscellaneous schools

66,136

15,220

25,040

11,131

5,453

912

62

543

460

3,015

4,300

633

48

73

78

17

45

54

37

95

178

8

46,912

6,269

24,799

10,472

4,147

851

4

51

34

173

112

18,591

8,903

168

581

1,289

16

4

455

331

2,664

4,180

Percent

All schoolsPreschools*Elementary schoolsLower secondary schoolsUpper secondary schools

Schools for the blind, deaf and otherwise handicapped

Technical colleges

Junior colleges

Universities

Special training schools

Miscellaneous schools

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1.0

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.3

4.9

87.1

6.8

20.7

5.9

0.2

70.9

41.2

99.0

94.1

76.0

93.3

6.5

9.4

7.4

5.7

2.6

28.1

58.5

0.7

5.2

23.6

1.7

6.5

83.8

72.0

88.4

97.2

*In addition to preschools under Monbusho in 1985 there were 22,899 daycare centers operated by the Ministry of Welfare, of which 13,600 were public and 9,299 were private. (Unpublished data supplied by the Ministry of Welfare.)

Source: Ministryof Education, Science, and Culture, Japan. Education in Japan: A Brief Outline. Tokyo: The Ministry, 1986. p. 19.

Table 2. Enrollment, by
Type of School, and

Percentage Distribution by Administrative Category:

May 1985

Type of School

Total Number of Students

Percentage Distribution

National

Local Public

(perfectural

and

municipal)

Private

Pre-elementary schools:PreschoolsDaycare centersElementary schoolsLower secondary schools

Upper secondary schools

Schools for the blind, deaf and otherwise handicapped

Universities

Junior colleges

Technical colleges

Special training schools

Miscellaneous schools

2,067,9511,770,46611,095,3725,990,183

5,177,681

95,401

1,848,698

371,095

48,288

538,175

530 159

0.3–0.40.6

0.2

3.9

24.3

4.7

84.4

3.4

0.0

24.456.999.096.5

71.7

95.2

3.0

5.6

8.6

4.5

1.8

75.343.10.52.9

28.1

0.9

72.7

89.7

7.0

92.2

98.1

Source: Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan. Education in Japan: A Brief Outline. Tokyo: The Ministry, 1986. p.5. Data on daycare centers provided by the Ministry of Welfare.

Table 3. Enrollment by
Type of School and Gender:

May 1985

Type of School

Enrollment

Total

Male

Female

PreschoolsElementary schoolsLower secondary schoolsUpper secondary schoolsSchools for the deaf, blind

and otherwise handicapped

Technical colleges

Junior colleges

Universities

Special training schools

Miscellaneous schools

2,067,95111,095,3725,990,1835,177,68195,401

48,288

371,095

1,848,698

538,175

530,159

1,055,5165,682,4903,067,8972,609,19859,283

46,565

37,920

1,414,297

225,990

271,695

1,012,4355,412,8822,922,2862,568,48336,118

1,723

333,175

434,401

312,185

258,464

Source: Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan. Education in Japan: A Brief Outline. Tokyo: The Ministry, 1986. p. 5.

Compulsory education

Compulsory education begins at age 6 and lasts 9 years, encompassing the 6-year elementary and 3-year lower secondary school period. It is characterized by a high degree of uniformity and equality of opportunity.

>>>(Personally, I would argue for a 6-3-3-4 system: 6 year elementary, 3 lower and 3 upper secondary, a 2 year national service and a 2 year ‘junior college’ period, thereby giving students an Associates Degree when they’re done with compulsory education.)

Curriculum standards are specified in a national Course of Study, and textbooks are government approved. Generally speaking, students throughout the country in the same grade study essentially the same material at approximately the same time and pace.
Schools are similar in facilities, standards, and teaching methodology. In short, the same basic education is provided for all for the first 9 years.

>>>(Thus providing, not only ease of transferring and fitting in for students, but savings by using standard texts, bulk buying
of equipment for the entire system, ease of comparing schools with each other, ease of tracking teacher and student performance, and other cost savings that come from having a standardized system nationally.)

During the compulsory school years Japanese education assiduously avoids making distinctions between students on the basis of ability or achievement. There are no separate tracks, ability groupings, remedial programs, or student electives. Promotion from grade to grade is virtually automatic as long as the student is attending classes. Students are almost never retained in grade or skipped ahead.

>>>(We do this now, but still hold some back according to test scores. Perhaps this method is better since we’re heading
that way.)

Compulsory education for blind and deaf children began in 1948. Coverage was broadened in 1979 to include other categories in special education. Students with major disabilities are educated in special schools, almost all of them public. Students with minor disabilities are educated in regular schools, either via mainstreaming or in special classes. In 1984 approximately half of the elementary schools provided special classes.

>>> ( Good way of treating this. There ARE disabled students that DO need special facilities and treatment and should be
provided for, in schools that are specially equipped for those MAJOR disabilities. Since it IS a nationally controlled system, there is no problem providing what is needed.)

Upper secondary and higher education

Educational uniformity diminishes beyond compulsory schooling, and there is some ability grouping at the upper secondary level. There are growing costs for parents at the senior high school level and beyond and restricted enrollment opportunities in public higher education.

>>> (Again, here I would split from the system described in this study.)

According to public perception, each institution at the upper secondary and higher education levels fits into a hierarchy. Which high school a student attends is determined by academic achievement confirmed by an entrance examination.

>>>( This might be a good addition to the system. Giving students an idea of where their abilities are at that time and providing
consultation in order to use what abilities each student has to the best use.)

University admission is determined largely by highly competitive examinations open to all applicants nationwide. These examinations are famously rigorous, and a student’s performance on them has a heavy impact on future social and economic status. In order to surmount the examination hurdle, a substantial proportion of students undertake remedial education, supplementary instruction, or special examination preparation assistance in private education programs.

>>>(I think the extension of compulsory education to include an Associate’s Degree here would aid students in their looking
towards attending a 4 year institution.)

Enrollment and advancement rates

Student participation rates are high and dropout rates low at all stages. Practically all–over 99 percent–of the children of compulsory school age are enrolled in school. Although pre-elementary and upper secondary schools are neither compulsory nor free of charge, more than 90 percent of Japanese children in the respective age groups attend them.

>>>(I do think society AND parental involvement contribute greatly to this)

After compulsory education in the 9th grade, over 94 percent of the students go on to full-time study in one or another form of
upper secondary education and another 2 percent continue part-time Table 4. The number of upper secondary school graduates in 1984 was 88 percent of the number of lower secondary graduates in 1981. [2] Over 29 percent of high school graduates
enter a university ( 18 percent) or junior college (11 percent). Another 25 percent enter a vocational education program of one sort or another Table 5). The great majority of those who enter these programs graduate.

Table 4. Number and
Percent of 1984 Lower
Secondary SchoolGraduates, by Activity
Immediately Following Graduation

Activity

Number

Percent

Upper secondary school:Full-time regular coursePart-time regular courseCorrespondence regular courseShort-term course

Subtotal: upper

secondary

Technical college

Vocational training

Subtotal: technical

and vocational

Employment

Unemployment

Deceased, unknown

Grand total

1,723,02134,5874,804249

1,762,661

9,563

43,617

53,180

51,318

15,039

570

1,882,768

91.521.84.26.01

93.62

.51

2.32

2.82

2.73

.80

.03

100.00

Table 5. Number and Percent
of 1984 High School
Graduates, by Activity Following Graduation

Activity

Number

Percent

University, junior college and advanced secondary
courses:
University undergraduate courseJunior college regular courseShort-term courses at universities and junior colleges and advanced courses
at upper secondary schoolsCorrespondence courses at universities and junior colleges

Subtotal: all university, junior colleges and advanced secondary courses

Vocational training:

Special training college–advanced course

Special training college–other courses

Miscellaneous school courses

Public training facility courses

Subtotal: all vocational training courses

Employment

Unemployment

Deceased, unknown

Grand total

266,810168,1073,897436

439,250a

172,283

17,057

174,759

8,570

372,669 b

590,125 c

77,574

2,694

1,482,312

18.0011.34.26.03

29. 63 a
11.62

11.15

11.79

.58

25 14 b

39.81 c

5.23

.18

100.00

a Includes 5,319 employed persons.

b Includes 11,793 employed persons.

c Excludes 17,112 employed persons referred to in footnotes 1 and 2,
who went on to higher level courses or vocational training.

Source: Ministryof Education, Science, and Culture, Japan.
Statistical Abstract of Education, Science and Culture
, 1985 edition. Tokyo: The Ministry, 1985. pp. 48, 49, 50.

Governance and administration [3]

Japan has a three-tiered structure for governing and administering education with national, prefectural, and municipal components, all under the general supervision of national authority, the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, commonly shortened to Ministry of Education (Monbusho). The relationships among the various components are summarized in figure 2.

>>>(In our terms: national, state, municipal)

Figure 2: Operating Relationships of National Educational Agencies

Education policymaking at all three levels is systematized and consensual. At the national level, Monbusho draws on the advice and recommendations of 13 standing advisory councils, members of which are appointed by the minister from a broad spectrum of specialists outside the ministry. The Central Council for Education is the most powerful of the group and is concerned with fundamental policy issues. Its members are appointed by the minister with the consent of the cabinet.

>>>( So there are outside voices giving advice to the national system, not just a single voice)

The Minister of Education is appointed by the Prime Minister, who is an elected member of the Diet (the popularly elected national legislature). Seldom does an Education Minister serve for more than a year or two, since cabinet posts are frequently shifted under Japan’s parliamentary system.

Monbusho is involved with the Cabinet and the Diet in developing budget estimates and drafting national legislation for education in Japan. In addition to its education responsibilities, Monbusho has overall responsibility for administering government services for science and culture, including all national museums and national art galleries and some national research institutes. The range of its functions is illustrated in figure 3.

Figure 3: Organization of Monbusho

src=”images/clip_image001.gif”>

The Ministry of Education wields a considerable measure of national authority over the entire official system of education, particularlyat the elementary and secondary school levels, by:

prescribing curricula, standards, and requirements;
approving textbooks;
providing guidance and financial assistance to the prefectures and municipalities;
authorizing the establishment of colleges and universities;
operating national education institutions, primarily universities, junior colleges and technical colleges;
providing general supervision of private institutions of higher education;
regulating establishment of private schools;
investigating and issuing directives to local boards of education for corrective action, as occasion may demand.

>>>( This means that ‘consumers’ have  at least the knowledge that any educational institution has been approved by the national government and meets a certain minimum standard. It also means that education is, in theory, equally provided
at an equal level to all sectors of the nation. Poorer areas get the same equipment and teachers as the wealthier areas.)

Each of the 47 prefectures has a 5-member board of education appointed by the governor with the consent of the prefectural
assembly. Prefectural boards of education are responsible for:

appointing the prefectural superintendent of education (with the approval of Monbusho);
operating schools established by prefectures, primarily upper secondary schools;
licensing teachers and, with municipal recommendation, making appointments to the various municipal elementary and lower secondary schools;
providing advice and financial assistance to municipalities on education matters.

>>>( The only change I would make (and perhaps it’s just a clarification) would be that the prefecture (state) does not set
the licensing standards and only gives a state license, but that the state administers a national licensing exam and issues a national teaching license. It also means that the state would be responsible for providing education from grade 10.)

The prefectural governor is responsible for operating prefectural postsecondary institutions and supervising the administration of private schools.

>>>( In other words, the state runs the state universities and supervises ALL private schools, religious or other.)

Each municipality has a 3- or 5-member municipal board of education, appointed by the mayor with the consent of the municipal assembly. These boards are responsible for:

operating municipal public elementary and lower secondary schools in their jurisdictions;
adopting textbooks for compulsory school use from Monbusho’s approved list;
making recommendations to the prefectural boards of education on the appointment and dismissal of teachers.

>>>( This means that municipalities are basically concerned with grades K-9. Education above that can be provided in addition to K-9)

The municipal superintendent of education is selected from among the board members with the consent of the prefectural board of education.

The mayor is responsible for operating municipal postsecondary institutions.

Finance

The cost of public education is shared by national, prefectural, and municipal governments, augmented at upper secondary and higher education levels by tuition from parents.

>>>( Here I would tend to stick with totally publically funded.)

Private institutions are established as nonprofit corporations which derive their income from student tuition and subsidies from national and local governments, sometimes augmented at the postsecondary level by contributions from business and industry.

>>>( Deserves a discussion)

The national government provides almost half of total public expenditures on education. [4] It funds the more than 600 “national” education institutions at all educational levels  table 1. It also provides subsidies for educational purposes to private institutions, prefectures, and municipalities. These include:

subsidies to prefectures to cover half the cost of salaries and allowances of educational personnel at
compulsory schools and schools for the handicapped;
subsidies to prefectures and municipalities to cover half the cost of teaching equipment for public compulsory schools; and
subsidies to prefectures and municipalities to cover one-half or one-third of the cost of construction of public elementary and secondary schools.

The national government also makes local allocation tax grants to prefectures and municipalities in order to reduce financial
inequalities among them, and a portion of these grants is used for education.

>>>( Half of the costs of education paid by the national government…period. That leave a quarter each for the state and
municipality…better than OUR system of funding education)

Prefectural governments provide funds for prefectural education institutions and services; salaries and allowances of teachers at
municipal elementary, lower secondary, and other schools; and subsidies to municipal elementary and lower secondary schools.

School year

The Japanese school year begins in early April and is organized into trimesters that run from April to July, September to December, and January to March. The principal long vacation takes place from mid-July to the end of August. There are shorter vacation periods at other times. In higher education, the academic year has two semesters.

>>>( Though it SOUNDS different from our school year, it actually is close to what we actually do, just ends a teaching period
before a long break or vacation instead of trying to continue classes through a long break. (i.e. Christmas vacation….spring vacation.) It makes more sense to end then start a new period than to try to get back up to speed after a week off)

The Japanese elementary and secondary school year is usually reported as being 240 days long, including Saturdays. This figure is somewhat misleading. Monbusho requires a minimum of 210 days of instruction, including a half day on Saturdays. Local boards can add more time at their discretion. They commonly specify 240 days. This permits 30 days for such school activities as field trips, Sports Day, cultural festivals, and graduation ceremonies. Adjusting for the half days on Saturdays, the Japanese
school year contains the full-time equivalent of about 195 days of classroom instruction. The average length of the school year in the United States is 180 days, and this total usually contains some days of activities comparable to those for which the Japanese local boards add extra days.

>>>(In other words…a STATED 60 more days…but the cultural fests and field trips can take up a good percentage of that extra
time…and are more fun than normal school. We do need to add these extra activities and add fun to school. And really, what parent wouldn’t like to have Saturday morning to catch up on things around the house with the kids in school until noon… )

On a cumulative basis this difference means that by the time of high school graduation, Japanese students have been in school for at least the equivalent of one American school year longer than students in the United States. The difference in time devoted to education is actually greater because of the more effective use that Japanese teachers make of time in school, the larger
amount of time Japanese students spend in study outside of school, and the number of days in the American school year given over to nonacademic pursuits.

The 5 1/2-day school week, the shorter summer vacation, and the additional time spent in study outside of school, in homework, tutoring, or juku all combine to make education a continuing aspect of Japanese children’s lives, somewhat analogous to a full-time job for adults.

>>>( And don’t we tend to consider school as the ‘full-time job’ our kids have? Adopting the Japanese school calender gets
children into habits they’ll need for most of the rest of their lives.)

Other dimensions of education in Japan

Japan is a learning society of formidable dimensions. The strong commitment to education and self-improvement extends beyond the official school system through a variety of institutions, programs, and opportunities. For example, there is a vast publishing industry which provides a wide range of general reading and education material for the highly literate Japanese public. The several national newspapers which report in depth on national and international affairs have a combined morning and evening daily circulation of more than 40 million. [5] High quality educational television is extensively developed and widely available. Other educational opportunities are found in diverse places, including cultural centers, department store clubs,
and correspondence schools.

>>>( Perhaps we should encourage more of the above here. Our nation’s survival and continued excellence is dependant on the
intelligence of our populace. The more society encourages learning, the better off the entire nation will be.)

to be continued….

Sidelined Buddah

26
May
11

A Study of the Japanese Education System…with my inserted comments. Part 1

This a looooong one. Basically a U.S. study of the Japanese educational system…with my simple comments inserted. There’s a lot to read…and a lot to mull over.

 

 

I came across this study in my
web hopping during a period of boredom and read it.  I found many things that might be used in the U.S.,
but might encounter resistance because it tends to need more National involvement than we’re used to here. Considering how mobile our population has gotten with the ease of transport across the nation, perhaps it IS time to set national standards and requirements for our children’s education. We are no longer restricted by ability to travel easily in where we are employed or find a better area to reside. There is a good reason to provide a greater uniformity to ease a child’s movement with their family. There should be a minimal need to
acclimate to the new school. A child should be able to slide right into the learning process anywhere in the nation.

 There is also the standardization of teacher requirements across the nation that would make it easier for both teachers and administrators to find each other and not wonder about what is expected and what is required…and if a teacher meets requirements…they would be tested and certified nationally. I’ll discuss within the document my thoughts and ideas about it and hope it provokes discussions around the country.

 

Sidelined Buddah

 

 

 

 

Japanese Educational
System   U.S. Dept. of Education Study

 

Historical and Cultural Context

The Context

Historical Background

Premodern times

Meiji period (1868-1912) to World War II

Postwar era

Some Cultural Foundations

Importance and purposes of education

Harmonious relations and central role of the group

Hard work, diligence, and perseverance

Motivation

Legacy

Historical and Cultural Context

It is no secret anymore that Japan has achieved world status in education. Indeed, some of Japan’s contemporary accomplishments in education–as in economic development–are literally in a class by themselves.

>>( As they always seem to do, by taking the best ideas from others, passing them through their national and cultural experiences and needs, and improving them for their use. )

Japanese education provides all children with a high quality, well-balanced basic education in the 3-R’s, science, music, and art
through 9 years of compulsory schooling.

>>( Note: well-balanced…including music and art.)

The average level of student achievement is high by international standards. So is the retention rate: virtually everyone completes the 9 compulsory years and almost 90 percent of the students graduate from high school.

>>( There has got to be much to learn here. We lag behind them here greatly)

Japan has also succeeded in:

Motivating students to learn and teaching them effective study habits;
Creating and maintaining a productive learning environment, which includes effective school discipline;
Using time productively for educational purposes in and out of school;
Sustaining attention to developing character and desirable attitudes and behavior (according to Japanese norms) throughout the elementary and secondary years;
Developing a professional teaching force that is competent and committed, well respected and well remunerated; and
Providing effective employment services for secondary school leavers and graduates.

>>>(OK folks…these are ALL things we lack here. In my mind, our failure to achieve this type of success is due to our insistence in ‘local control’ and our belief that ‘only the neighborhood knows what our kids need to learn’. If both were true, why are our schools doing such a lousy job? It’s can’t only be the teachers. Perhaps we as a nation need to realize that there is a use for a national educational system with local inputs. )

These accomplishments result from several interwoven factors, including:

A preschool experience (much of it parent financed) for more than 90 percent of children;
An effective public school system, particularly during the compulsory attendance period, supplemented at elementary and secondary levels by
An informal, but symbiotic set of private (parent financed) education programs responsive to the needs of individual students.

>>>(Ok, there is the public/private part of the equation. There is a place for the private sector, but as an addition to, NOT a
replacement for, public education. There would need to be a co-ordination between both to provide a system that compliments each part and not fight amongst each other’s methods. The private would be subject to what the public system is teaching and act as a re-enforcement and clarifier of thing students need help with)

All of the foregoing are undergirded by strong parental commitment to and sustained support for the education of the child during the entire time he or she is in school. Education is reinforced at every turn by the historical and cultural heritage, community consensus, government policy, and the needs and employment practices of business, industry, and government.

>>> (In other words, education is seen as important. Something highly desired. Parents and society both place high regard
for education and the educated. Something lacking in the U.S.. There needs to be a paradigm shift where our culture celebrates those that excel in intellectual abilities and rewards those as well or better than we now do those that can toss a basketball, catch a football, or hit a baseball. In our country, those that are ‘smart’ are, derided, bullied, scorned, and excluded. Things need to change…in media, in policy, in thinking.)

Japanese education has produced multiple benefits for the nation as well as for its individual students. These benefits include a
well-educated citizenry, which strengthens national democracy; an adaptable work force capable of high productivity in a competitive world economy; the opportunity for individual social and economic mobility; and an improved general quality of life.

>>> ( Just what we’re crying that we need now….)

Despite these achievements, the system is not perfect. The Japanese know better than most foreign observers that there are significant costs as well as benefits associated with the choices they have made and the results achieved. Some difficulties appear before the end of elementary school and are compounded in secondary education. Higher education is in many respects the weakest part of the entire system even though, paradoxically, it continues to exert a commanding influence on the elementary and secondary levels that feed it. The problems are widely acknowledged in Japan and are currently the subject
of concerned scrutiny in and out of government.

>>>( We shouldn’t have this problem here. Our higher education is still among the world’s finest. It’s getting the students up to speed to compete in the global workplace and into position to enter our higher education system that we are failing.)

In trying to understand how the Japanese accomplish what they do in education, how and why the system works, and some of its dynamics, one finds that more than the school system is involved. The home environment for the student, home-school relation, unofficial education programs outside the school (particularly the juku), the relationship between industry and education, especially at the postsecondary level–all have to be taken into account along with history and culture.

>>>( In other words, the entire nation is involved in the education system…parents, politicians, business leaders, neighbors…EVERYONE. It seems they understand that a well-educated population benefits all…not just the one being educated.)

For Westerners, Japanese education is fascinating and complex. Its achievements appear to be as much a product of the nation’s unique historical and cultural foundations and parental commitment as of pedagogical policies and practices. Indeed, several specific factors that contribute to educational achievement may not be readily exportable, so tied are they to the Japanese context.

>>>(True…but that doesn’t preclude adapting those that aren’t. )

While this report devotes some attention to problems and to the current reform movement that aims to solve them, it focuses primarily on understanding Japanese education–formal and informal–in its cultural context. The goal is to present enough information in sufficient perspective that Japanese education can speak for itself. Japanese terms are introduced where
useful, and a glossary is included.

The report also sketches–primarily in Secretary Bennett’s epilogue–some possible implications, for improving American education. These points are not prescriptive. They are intended to stimulate the reader to examine the doctrines, values, performance, and potential of American education in a light refracted through the prism of Japanese experience. In the United States, it is up to those directly responsible for education–state, local and private authorities and individual citizens–to draw their own conclusions about the relevance of Japanese experience to their own situations.

>>>( In that last statement resides the reason things will probably stay basically the same…those four entities rarely see things the same, or want the same results…or ceding their ‘power’ where needed. They all think they ‘know what is best’. For ANY real change to occur across the nation, and it DOES need to happen nationwide, it’s not just a local or state problem anymore, it needs the national government to provide standards for all schools, public and private, and nationally certifying teachers and
principals.)

The Context

In Japan, as in most countries, education is best understood in its historical and cultural context. Indeed, sometimes education cannot be meaningfully separated from its social foundations. This is particularly true for Japan, both because much of the nation’s history and culture is not widely known in the United States and Western Europe and because enduring cultural values strongly affect so much of contemporary Japanese education. While justice cannot be done to Japanese education’s rich
historical and cultural background in brief summary, some basic context is essential for understanding Japanese education today.

Historical Background

Not all of Japanese education is homegrown. Japan is unusual in its long record of interest and initiative in learning from other
countries. Most modern nations, including the United States, have been the beneficiaries of education ideas from other countries, but Japan has been more active in deliberately seeking ideas from abroad to help solve its education problems as it perceives them and less self-conscious in adapting those which seem useful.

>>> (In other words, they know they aren’t perfect and have problems and aren’t afraid to find solutions outside the nation)

While contemporary Japanese education has been widely praised, especially because of outstanding results demonstrated in
international comparative studies of school achievement in science and mathematics, it is not well known that Japan’s record of distinction in education has roots that go back over a hundred years. Indeed, in some important respects education in Japan
today is heir to a legacy of ideas whose origins long predate the century of modern Japanese history.

Premodern times

Chinese civilization was particularly influential in the formation of Japan’s culture, and Chinese philosophical and literary influences have remained strong throughout Japanese history. Along with Buddhism, which came to Japan in the sixth century A.D., came the Chinese system of writing and its literary tradition. So, too, came Confucianism, its respect for learning, the Confucian classics, and its philosophical traditions. Among other things, the Confucian heritage emphasized respectful and benevolent hierarchical relationships, harmonious social relations, and morality. Chinese ideas and systems were modified to suit Japanese circumstances and ideals, and were interwoven with Japanese philosophical and literary traditions.

>>> (This means that Japan and China are more alike than the U.S. and Japan. But as modern Japan shows, Japanese tend to be able to take what they consider the best from things and meld them into their national culture. It also provides a deeper insight into China…historical memory tends to persist…even if those in power at times want it to vanish. There might be much to learn about China’s deeper thinking through the Japanese. )

As the European nations began to expand their empires to Asia, Japan experienced an intense period of contact with the Western world from 1540 to 1640. Japan’s traditional focus on the Asian continent was broadened to include commerce with Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, and England, the great seafaring trade and colonial powers of the age. Concurrently, Japan was in the final throes of a period of civil wars, and the Japanese were quick to acquire and exploit Western weapons and other new technology for internal purposes. Jesuit missionaries, who arrived with the Portuguese traders, were active printers. [1] Besides religious materials, they also published Japanese dictionaries, grammars, and textbooks for use in church schools and helped the Japanese add European scripts to their printing capability. Some Japanese traveled to Europe in this era. There was even a noteworthy mission to the Vatican. [2]

>>> ( So, not only are they influenced by ancient China’s respect for learning, the Jesuits bring their influences as well.)

In 1603, after unifying the country, the Tokugawa family established a government headed by the shogun (military ruler). Four
decades later, to consolidate power further, the shogun banned Christianity, prohibited virtually all foreign trade and contact, and closed Japan to the outside world. The nation then entered a period of isolation and relative domestic tranquility, which was to last for 200 years.

>>> (Which probably allowed the shogun to cement the idea of a single nation and government without outsiders trying to interfere.)

Education was very important for the warrior samurai, the most powerful class in Japanese feudal society. The samurai functioned as government administrators during this period. The curriculum for the samurai was based on both military and literary studies The literature was primarily Confucian classics, large portions of which were memorized and recited. Study
of the martial arts consisted of swordsmanship and military tactics.

>>> (In other words…the people with the most education were the most powerful…and the warrior class as well. Again, note…they studied BOTH military AND literary arts…)

Commoner education was generally more practically oriented. It centered around providing basic training in reading, writing, and arithmetic, emphasizing the use of the abacus and calligraphy. Much of this education was conducted in so-called temple schools (terakoya). It is estimated that by the end of the Tokugawa period there may have been more than 14,000 such schools in Japan. [3] They were often one-room private schools, usually with one teacher and a group of students of mixed ages and abilities. Teaching techniques included reading from various textbooks, as well as memorizing and repeatedly copying Chinese characters and Japanese script.

>>>( Still, they DID provide education for the commoners…limited as it was.)

From the 1790’s on, Japan began once again to have contacts with other nations and felt renewed foreign pressures to open the
doors to the outside world. By 1853, when Commodore Matthew Perry arrived requesting that Japan establish formal diplomatic and trade relations with the United States, Japan was neither ignorant of world affairs nor inexperienced in dealing with other nations.

At the start of the Tokugawa period, reading and writing were largely the province of the priesthood and the nobility. Most of the population was illiterate. By the end of the era, however, there had been such a dramatic growth in education that the level of schooling and literacy compared favorably with that of England and France. [4]According to the best estimates, by the end
of the Tokugawa period almost all of the children of the court nobility and the governing samurai had some school experience, and probably 40 to 50 percent of commoner boys and 10 to 15 percent of girls of school age received some schooling.[5] Under subsequent Meiji leadership, this foundation would facilitate Japan’s rapid transition from feudal country to modern nation within a relatively short span of time.

>>>( Hmmm…1800 Japan had the U.S.’s current education stats….interesting…sad, but interesting)

Meiji period (1868-1912) to World War II

In 1868, after a decade of bitter internal discord, the Tokugawa government was overturned by a loose alliance of internal opponents who restored political power to the Emperor. The new leadership rapidly set Japan on a modernization course. They began to study not only the nature of Western society, but Western education methods as well.

The Meiji leaders realized from the outset that education had a major role to play in nation building and modernization. The government consciously set out to create a public education system that would help Japan catch up to the West. Missions were sent abroad to study the education systems of leading Western countries. In due course, Western advisors were invited to Japan to help devise new approaches for Japanese education.

While the new system built atop the education base laid down in the Tokugawa period, it was quite different from the old. Public
schooling was systematically introduced throughout the country. It was open to girls as well as boys and to lower as well as upper classes. The new system endeavored to tap all the nation’s human resources in support of national objectives.

Ronald Anderson briefly summarizes the resulting evolution to World War II:

The Meiji leaders…borrowed selectively from the West, leaning primarily on the United States as a model for the initial modern school system. After almost a decade of American influence, however, Confucian sources were once again consulted for educational guidance and Germany was found to be a model more congenial to their own traditions and goals. They codified a nationalist educational philosophy in 1890 in the famed Imperial Rescript on Education, which was the basis for Japan’s ideology until 1945. The Imperial Rescript stressed Confucian precepts, particularly those concerning the hierarchical nature of human relations, service to the state, and the pursuit of learning and morality.

>>>( There lies the difference…the ability to take from other systems and mold them into their own. Not to mention the teaching of those precepts noted in that last sentence…” particularly those concerning the hierarchical nature of human relations, service to the state, and the pursuit of learning and morality.”)

Besides the exposure to an egalitarian American influence in the first decade of the Meiji period, Japan experienced a second transmission of democratic American educational influence in the so-called “liberal 1920’s” when the philosophy of John Dewey
and the progressive education movements became popular. Though widely accepted at normal schools and the elementary level, this approach was suppressed by the militarists when they rose to power in the late 1930’s. During World War II, education was characterized by authoritarianism, indoctrination, and thought control. [6]

By the end of the war Japanese education was devastated. Students were not attending school with any regularity, if at all, and many school buildings had been destroyed. With defeat came the bankruptcy of much of prewar thought. A new wave of foreign ideas was introduced during the postwar military occupation period.

>>>( Nothing like starting from scratch…)

Postwar era

Occupation policymakers were determined to democratize Japan. The United States Education Mission, which arrived in 1946, believed that a complete reform of Japanese education was necessary to help achieve this objective. The Mission made a number of recommendations for major changes in the Japanese education system along American lines. Some of the resulting changes included the institution of the 6-3-3 grade structure; the revision of curriculum and textbooks, including the abolition of moral education courses (which had become highly nationalistic in the decade leading to the war); reforms in the writing
system; the establishment of coeducation; the introduction of university-based teacher education; and support for equal access to higher education. There was also an attempt to transform the centralized prewar system into a decentralized system based on the American model with elected local school boards.

>>>(As we tried to mold them into our image…it did provide a nice base to start on tho.)

After the restoration of full national sovereignty in 1952, Japan immediately began to modify some of the education changes introduced during the Occupation period. These modifications more clearly reflected Japanese ideas about education and educational structure. The Ministry of Education regained a great deal of power. School boards reverted to being appointed, rather than elected. A moral education course was reinstituted in modified form, despite substantial initial concern that it would lead to a reintroduction of prewar nationalism into the schools.

>>>(Like I said..a starting point. There is a purpose for a centralized system, especially when dealing with something that needs to be as standardized as possible across a nation. Appointed school boards are preferred in my opinion. Elections are more of a popularity contest here and policy tends to get buried. An appointed school board tends to discuss policy more than being popular as they are the buffer between the citizens and the appointer. And moral education…what a concept…we need that here…but a SECULAR morality…not religious.  It IS a PUBLIC school system, and religion is best left to home and church.)

By the 1960’s, postwar recovery and accelerating economic growth brought increased demands on the education system. In addition, there were strong disagreements between the government and the teachers’ union. This was also a period of great turbulence in higher education. All this fueled confrontation and debate about education reform. Some aspects of Japan’s
current reform movement can be traced back to the late 1960’s.

( Ah yes…some things remain constant across borders  )

The Japanese education system has grown rapidly since 1960. According to Morikazu Ushiogi, from 1960 to 1982 the proportion of the high school age group enrolled in high schools increased from about 58 percent to 94 percent, while the proportion of those of college age enrolled in higher education institutions increased from about 10 percent to 36 percent. [7]

>>> (Don’t we WISH we had these stats…*sigh)

Today’s system still reflects the long-standing cultural and philosophical ideas that learning and education are esteemed and are to be pursued seriously, and that moral and character development remain intimately related to education. A meritocratic legacy stemming from the Meiji period endures, as does a centralized education infrastructure and an orientation toward viewing education in the service of national development as well as of personal benefit. The interest remains in investigating alternative education models abroad, as does a continuing capability to adapt foreign ideas and methods to Japanese traditions.

>>> (Interesting…a respect for learning and the desire for it is respected as well, morality and character are also included in
partnership with parents and society, and the nation as a whole and in policy sees education as a national developmental benefit….man, do WE need to change our thinking here  )

Some Cultural Foundations

Japanese education is a powerful instrument of cultural continuity and national policy. The explicit and implicit content of the school curriculum and the manner in which teaching and learning are accomplished impart the attitudes, knowledge, sensitivities, and skills expected of emerging citizens of Japanese society. These lessons are further reinforced in the context of family and society.

>>>( Not only are they taught book learning, but what it means to be Japanese, and what is expected of them in society…and that gets reinforced by parents and neighbors. Can you really say you know what it means to be an American? Can you see it in your parents and neighbors? Do you think you’d want to know what is expected from you early in life?)

Linguistically, racially, and ethnically, Japan is a comparatively homogeneous nation with a strong sense of cultural identity and national unity. But Japanese society is not monolithic, and there is considerable individuality. There are also finely calibrated distinctions in status based on age, gender, employment, and social and educational background.

( Major differences here, especially racially and ethnically, but they don’t preclude developing a strong sense of cultural
identity (being an American) and national unity)

Despite these differences, however, the Japanese prefer to define themselves in a manner which emphasizes their core of commonly held beliefs and values. While popular culture and lifestyles have undergone some dramatic changes since World War II, there remains a high degree of public consensus regarding societal values, appropriate standards of behavior, and the
importance and goals of education.

>>>( Something we might learn from…emphasize what we hold in common and define ourselves that way.)

Importance and purposes of education

The origins of the Japanese commitment to education lie in the Confucian and Buddhist heritage in which great respect is accorded learning and educational endeavor as means to personal and societal improvement. Today, there is a clear consensus that education is essential for both individual and national development and that it requires active, sustained commitment of
energy and resources at all levels of society.

>>>( Note that last statement…we can’t just do something once and think it will solve things, it’s a constant commitment that
is needed…from everyone. In other words..no quick fix and you just can’t ‘set it and forget it’.)

Parents and children take education seriously because success in school is a crucial determinant of economic and social status in
adult life. Government policymakers and business leaders view the content and quality of public education as central to national cohesion, economic development, and international relations.

>>>( If only WE saw education the same way. Letting our future get dumber and ignorant just erodes the nation’s standing.
We’ll be a Third World country before we know it.)

To the Japanese, education has always had important goals in addition to acquisition of academic knowledge, intellectual growth, or vocational skills. Moral education and character development are also among the central concerns. There is a strong consensus that schools have the obligation and authority to impart fundamental Japanese values as the foundation of proper
moral attitudes and personal habits.

>>>( And yes, there are fundamental American values as well.  See the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, for examples)

Respect for society and the established order, prizing group goals above individual interests, diligence, self-criticism, and
well-organized and disciplined study and work habits are all traits, which are believed to be amenable to instruction.

>>>( This line of thought might be difficult for the believers of the ‘rugged individualists’, but what major, lasting things
have been accomplished by ONLY a single person? Lindberg?  Nope, he had a support team, an aircraft maker, financial backers, etc.. Take just about ANY ‘solo’ accomplishment and dig beneath the hype and just about EVERY time you’ll encounter a group of people that made the ‘solo’ accomplishment possible. In fact, if you study the lives of many successful people, you’ll find most of the traits stated in that statement in their way of doing things.)

The child’s learning experiences at each level from preschool through 12th grade reinforce their acquisition. Japanese teachers
believe that the proper development of these values, attitudes, and habits is fundamental to success in the classroom as well as in adult life.

>>>(Ya gotta learn the rules before you can break them. You can’t excel in sports if you don’t know how to play.)

Harmonious relations and central role of the group

Japanese society places a high value on harmony in interpersonal relations and the ability to cooperate with others. The Japanese believe that being a member of a well-organized and tightly knit group that works hard toward common goals is a natural and pleasurable human experience. Schools reflect this cultural priority. Classroom activities are structured to encourage or require participation in group activities, to emphasize the responsibility of individual students to the class as a group and the school as a whole, and to develop group loyalty.

>>>(Or what businesses and sport teams depend on….)

Particularly in elementary school, classes are organized into small groups, which are the basic units of instruction, discipline, and other activities. Teachers attempt to foster group cohesion and a strong group spirit by avoiding overt recognition of differences in individual ability and minimizing one-against-one competition.

>>>(Individual achievements are fine, but it’s more fun to be able to share a success as a group than alone.)

Daily life in a Japanese classroom requires considerable mutual assistance and adaptation of individual views and interests to group goals and standards of behavior. The heavy emphasis on group activities and social consensus results in considerable conformity in behavior. There is a strong tradition of viewing conformity and group orientation as demonstrations of moral character.

>>>(Can be good, can be bad…note Japan’s crime rate…I lean towards good here)

To most Westerners, a high degree of behavioral conformity is typically associated with top-down control. However, Japanese teachers are not typically authoritarian nor is harshness a characteristic of classroom life in Japan. Instead, the cultural emphasis on harmony and hard work requires that each individual within the system be a willing contributor to the group effort.

>>>( In other words…as a group we can accomplish bigger and better things, but the group needs every individual’s contribution to succeed)

Group leadership, Japanese style, orchestrates the members’ motivations and expectations so that order and discipline, both in the classroom and the larger society, are natural outgrowths of achieving a high degree of individual identification with group goals.

>>>( More can be done if things are done in a disciplined, orderly fashion, than if the group’s efforts are scattered and
going in different directions)

Hard work, diligence, and perseverance

The Japanese believe that hard work, diligence, and perseverance yield success in education as well as in other aspects of life. A
certain amount of difficulty and hardship is believed to strengthen students’ character and their resolve to do their best in learning and other important endeavors.

>>>( Nothing ever comes easy all the time. Being able to overcome problems and setbacks increases a student’s confidence in
their own abilities and the abilities of a group to help.)

The amount of time and effort spent in study are believed to be more important than intelligence in determining educational outcomes. Most Japanese parents and educators are unshakably optimistic that virtually all children have the potential to master the challenging academic curriculum, provided they work hard and long enough.

>>>( As opposed to many in the U. S.that think that some students will NEVER be able to succeed.)

Some teachers and students are less sanguine. The educational results achieved by most Japanese students in international comparisons provide considerable support for the beliefs and expectations of the majority, particularly in light of the fact
that there is no credible evidence that Japanese children have a higher level of native intelligence than, for example, American children.

>>>( Expectations often make the results that are expected.  Expect failure, you get failure…expect success…you’ll get success, if not, something better than if you set your sights low.)

A recent comparative study by Robert Hess and others provides interesting confirmation of the Japanese belief in the efficacy of
effort:

In Japan, poor performance in mathematics was attributed to lack of effort; in the United States, explanations were more evenly divided among ability, effort, and training at school. Japanese mothers were less likely to blame training at school as a
cause of low achievement in mathematics…Their children generally shared this view of things. [8]

Parents and teachers encourage regular study habits from the 1st grade on. A careful, reflective approach which achieves accuracy and precision rather than speed or intuitive insight is emphasized, particularly during the early years.

>>>( It may take you a minute, it may take you an hour…what is important is that you get the correct answer, not how fast you get it.)

Repetition and memorization continue to be important in the learning process, particularly in preparation for the arduous and important high school and college entrance examinations.

>>>(Well, considering that most of the basics are needed to be memorized in order to do higher studies…and repetition is one way to learn a needed basic…not surprising)

Motivation

The cultural emphasis on student effort and diligence is balanced by a recognition of the important responsibility borne by teachers, parents, and schools to “awaken the desire to try.”

>>>( Not only do you need to show up, you actually need to try…and it’s not only the school’s job to motivate students….)

Japanese teachers do not believe that motivation is primarily a matter of luck, family background, or personality traits. They believe that the desire to learn–like character itself–is something which can be shaped by teachers and influenced through the school environment. Students are unceasingly taught and urged to “do their best,” in groups and as individuals.

>>>(In other words…you can learn to want to learn…and it’s the school’s job to bring that out in students.)

A major method of motivating students is the encouragement of group activities, which are believed to be more enjoyable for students than solitary endeavor.

>>>( What is more fun…sitting alone, working on a project, or working on a project with a group? Especially for those without a
background in ‘learning’)

Motivation through group activity is accomplished by promoting a strong sense of shared identity and by allowing individuals
opportunity to influence group goals and activities. Wearing school uniforms, rotating student monitors, and planning and staging class and school activities all contribute to the process.

>>> (Why do people like joining a gang, or a team, or a team rooting section, or company?  A sense of ‘belonging’.)

Particularly at the secondary level, entrance examinations provide special motivation for study. Students know that their scores on high school and university entrance examinations will strongly influence their future life path. Parents reinforce this concern by urging their children to study hard, by providing a home environment conducive to study, and by financing extra lessons and tutorial assistance.

>>>(Again, parental support is basic)

Legacy

Japanese history and cultural values permeate Japanese education. The heritage is reflected in the national consensus on the
importance of education, its role in character development, and the willingness of both parents and children to sustain effort and sacrifice year after year to achieve success in school. It helps form the invisible foundation of the contemporary education system.

>>>(It’s not me, me, me, what’s in it for me, it’s doing the best for my kid so they can do the best for society)

to be continued…

Sidelined Buddah

26
May
11

FDR Speech Part 5 A New Bill of Rights

It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an Americanstandard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth- is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill housed, and insecure.>>(Even though the war was still in flux, FDR was planning for what would happen after the war was won. What ever happened to ‘planning for the future’? Why does it need to be ‘governing by crisis’? Most of our problems can be solved, if not avoided by good advance planning.)

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

>> ( Let’s see…free speech: still here, if just barely; free press: only if you are the owner of a multi-national corporation. Very few independent news sources now.; free worship: still here, barely…if you’re muslim, you’re under suspicion and not really welcome in some areas…*sigh; trial by jury: still here, if you can avoid the media frenzy over some cases…and you aren’t in Guantanamo.; freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures….nope…Drug laws and the Patriot Act smashed this one to bits. Why is Congress extending the Patriot Act anyway? And where is the outrage? Bloody sheep…  FDR might have been right in using ‘were’.)

As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

>>(And it takes one of the Patrician class to tell us that…)

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

>>( Just what Republicans and big business want…total control)

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;

>>(EVERYONE has a RIGHT to a good job…and for those that need clarification, ‘remunerative’ means “profitable…lucritive”…not minimum wage jobs, but good…union..jobs)

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

>>(note the adjective ‘adequate’…not just getting by, but enough to enjoy life)

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

>>(yes that means a price floor for basic farm goods…but also more varied farming instead of megafarms and corporate farming)

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

(that means fair trade regulation, anti-trust enforcement, breaking up the giant corporations, including the banks)

The right of every family to a decent home;

>> (government provided housing?  sure…no mortgage crisis, less homeless, allows families to concentrate on education and providing a good homelife for kids….more benefits than drawbacks)

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

>>( Medicare for all anyone? Yes adding vision, dental and mental health to the mix)

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

>>(Social Security and Unemployment Insurance….needed more now than ever)

The right to a good education.

>>(Time for the National funding of education along with national criteria)

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens. For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

>>(Again FDR states that security begins at home…and not the police state type, but the entire country working towards betterment for all in the country and providing a good life for the ENTIRE populace…not just a few. )

One of the great American industrialists of our day—a man who has rendered yeoman service to his country in this crisis-recently emphasized the grave dangers of “rightist reaction” in this Nation. All clear-thinking businessmen share his concern. Indeed, if such reaction should develop—if history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called “normalcy” of the 1920’s—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.

>> ( Talk about seeing the future…look around, REALLY LOOK AROUND…read about the 1920’s and the actions and business that were working then. Learn HOW AND WHY the Great Depression happened and why similar conditions were around in 2008 before the ‘bubble’ burst ….and still exist right now.)

I ask the Congress to explore the means for implementing this economic bill of rights- for it is definitely the responsibility of the Congress so to do. Many of these problems are already before committees of the Congress in the form of proposed legislation. I shall from time to time communicate with the Congress with respect to these and further proposals. In the event that no adequate program of progress is evolved, I am certain that the Nation will be conscious of the fact.

>>( Is the Nation? Really? Even tho Congress has eroded the safeguards FDR put in place to prevent another Great Depression and allowed a Great Recession? Really? Allowing the ultra rich to get richer off taxpayer funds?  Giving those that need them the least tax breaks? Bloody sheep…..)

Our fighting men abroad- and their families at home- expect such a program and have the right to insist upon it. It is to their demands that this Government should pay heed rather than to the whining demands of selfish pressure groups who seek to feather their nests while young Americans are dying.

>>( Why does this sound current? )

The foreign policy that we have been following—the policy that guided us at Moscow, Cairo, and Teheran—is based on the common sense principle which was best expressed by Benjamin Franklin on July 4, 1776: “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

I have often said that there are no two fronts for America in this war. There is only one front. There is one line of unity which extends from the hearts of the people at home to the men of our attacking forces in our farthest outposts. When we speak of our total effort, we speak of the factory and the field, and the mine as well as of the battleground — we speak of the soldier and the civilian, the citizen and his Government.

Each and every one of us has a solemn obligation under God to serve this Nation in its most critical hour—to keep this Nation great — to make this Nation greater in a better world.

>>(Is this such an old-fashioned thought? Isn’t the group stronger than the individual? Isn’t it better to uplift the whole than a few?)

Citation: John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The American Presidency Project [online]. Santa Barbara, CA. Available from World Wide Web: (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=16518).
© 1999-2011 – Gerhard Peters – The American Presidency Project
>>(Yep…back in 1944, FDR saw what the country could be, both for good and for bad, and warned us about the bad and provided ways to strengthen the good. Why have we forgotten what we fought against and fought for back then? Have we forgotten the ‘boom times’ of the 50’s and 60’s? We’ve been coasting since then…and allowing corporations their way. This nation has always grown through the creation of new inventions and business, not propping up the old. Time to break up the conglomerates…)
26
May
11

FDR Speech Part 4

These five measures together form a just and equitable whole. I would not recommend a national service law unless the other laws were passed to keep down the cost of living, to share equitably the burdens of taxation, to hold the stabilization line, and to
prevent undue profits.

The Federal Government already has the basic power to draft capital and property of all kinds for war purposes on a basis of just compensation.

As you know, I have for three years hesitated to recommend a national service act. Today, however, I am convinced of its necessity. Although I believe that we and our allies can win the war without such a measure, I am certain that nothing less than total mobilization of all our resources of manpower and capital will guarantee an earlier victory, and reduce the toll of suffering and sorrow and blood.

I have received a joint recommendation for this law from the heads of the War Department, the Navy Department, and the Maritime Commission. These are the men who bear responsibility for the procurement of the necessary arms and equipment, and for the successful prosecution of the war in the field. They say:

“When the very life of the Nation is in peril the responsibility for service is common to all men and women. In such a time there can be no discrimination between the men and women who are assigned by the Government to its defense at the battlefront and the men and women assigned to producing the vital materials essential to successful military operations. A prompt enactment of a National Service Law would be merely an expression of the universality of this responsibility.”

I believe the country will agree that those statements are the solemn truth.

National service is the most democratic way to wage a war. Like selective service for the armed forces, it rests on the obligation of each citizen to serve his Nation to his utmost where he is best qualified.

It does not mean reduction in wages. It does not mean loss of retirement and seniority rights and benefits. It does not mean that any substantial numbers of war workers will be disturbed in their present jobs. Let these facts be wholly clear.

Experience in other democratic Nations at war—Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand- has shown that the very existence of national service makes unnecessary the widespread use of compulsory power. National service has proven to be a
unifying moral force based on an equal and comprehensive legal obligation of all people in a Nation at war.

>>(I noticed a transposition when I cut and pasted the previous installment and figured I’d start with where the problem took place)

There are millions of American men and women who are not in this war at all. It is not because they do not want to be in it. But they want to know where they can best do their share. National service provides that direction. It will be a means by which
every man and woman can find that inner satisfaction which comes from making the fullest possible contribution to victory.

I know that all civilian war workers will be glad to be able to say many years hence to their grandchildren:
“Yes, I, too, was in service in the great war. I was on duty in an airplane factory, and I helped make hundreds of fighting planes. The Government told me that in doing that I was performing my most useful work in the service of my country.”

It is argued that we have passed the stage in the war where national service is necessary. But our soldiers and sailors know that this is not true. We are going forward on a long, rough road- and, in all journeys, the last miles are the hardest. And it is for that final effort—for the total defeat of our enemies-that we must mobilize our total resources. The national war program calls for the employment of more people in 1944 than in 1943.

It is my conviction that the American people will welcome this win-the-war measure which is based on the eternally just principle of “fair for one, fair for all.”

It will give our people at home the assurance that they are standing four-square behind our soldiers and sailors. And it will give our enemies demoralizing assurance that we mean business -that we, 130,000,000 Americans, are on the march to Rome,
Berlin, and Tokyo.

>>( FDR knew that the war was not even close to being over and that any slacking on the Allies part might allow the Axis to gain ground. He also knew that in order to win the war he needed to keep the country’s will to wage the war high. You can’t win if the
nation isn’t behind the war effort.)

I hope that the Congress will recognize that, although this is a political year, national service is an issue which transcends politics. Great power must be used for great purposes.

As to the machinery for this measure, the Congress itself should determine its nature—but it should be wholly nonpartisan in its make-up.

Our armed forces are valiantly fulfilling their responsibilities to our country and our people. Now the Congress faces the responsibility for taking those measures which are essential to national security in this the most decisive phase of the Nation’s greatest war.

Several alleged reasons have prevented the enactment of legislation which would preserve for our soldiers and sailors and marines the fundamental prerogative of citizenship—the right to vote. No amount of legalistic argument can becloud this issue in the eyes of these ten million American citizens. Surely the signers of the Constitution did not intend a document which, even in wartime, would be construed to take away the franchise of any of those who are fighting to preserve the Constitution itself.

>> ( Yes this refers to the Jim Crow laws and the problems that blacks had trying to exercise their right to vote…even for war veterans. “We support our troops.” Yep..until they come home. )

Our soldiers and sailors and marines know that the overwhelming majority of them will be deprived of the opportunity to vote, if the voting machinery is left exclusively to the States under existing State laws—and that there is no likelihood of these laws being
changed in time to enable them to vote at the next election. The Army and Navy have reported that it will be impossible effectively to administer forty-eight different soldier voting laws. It is the duty of the Congress to remove this unjustifiable discrimination against the men and women in our armed forces- and to do it as quickly as possible.

>>( Yep they acted quickly….wasn’t the Voting Rights Act enacted soon after this speech….like 1965? )

(I included the entire speech before his statement for a new ‘bill of rights’ in order to provide the context in which he stated them. They weren’t a separate thought. They were part of a State of the Union Address. FDR honestly wanted Congress to seriously consider them. They will be in the next post on the speech)

To be continued….

Sidelined Buddah

25
May
11

FDR Speech….Part 3

Franklin D. Roosevelt: State of the
Union Message to Congress – January 11, 1944

Let us remember the lessons of 1918. In the summer of that year the tide turned in favor of the allies. But this Government did not relax. In fact, our national effort was stepped up. In August, 1918, the draft age limits were broadened from 21-31 to 18-45. The President called for “force to the utmost,” and his call was heeded. And in November, only three months later, Germany
surrendered.

That is the way to fight and win a war—all out—and not with half-an-eye on the battlefronts abroad and the other eye-and-a-half on personal, selfish, or political interests here at home.

>>(We never DID go all out in either Afghanistan or Iraq. Guess that sort of national commitment
wouldn’t have been politically popular.)

Therefore, in order to concentrate all our energies and resources on winning the war, and to maintain a fair and stable economy at home, I recommend that the Congress adopt:

(1) A realistic tax law—which will tax all unreasonable profits, both individual and corporate, and reduce the ultimate cost of the war to our sons and daughters. The tax bill now under consideration by the Congress does not begin to meet this test.

>>(See..we’re STILL trying to get a REALISTIC tax bill passed. Since 1943…talk about discussing a matter to death)

(2) A continuation of the law for the renegotiation of war contracts—which will prevent exorbitant profits and assure fair prices to the Government. For two long years I have pleaded with the Congress to take undue profits out of war.

>>( Hello Blackwater….Halliburton…BP.  Congress STILL allows profiteering…even at the risk to our troops)

(3) A cost of food law—which will enable the Government (a) to place a reasonable floor under the prices the farmer may expect for his production; and (b) to place a ceiling on the prices a consumer will have to pay for the food he buys. This should
apply to necessities only; and will require public funds to carry out. It will cost in appropriations about one percent of the present annual cost of the war.

>>(Might be an idea that might need to be reconsidered. Too many can’t afford a proper meal, even today)

(4) Early reenactment of. the stabilization statute of October, 1942. This expires June 30, 1944, and if it is not extended well in advance, the country might just as well expect price chaos by summer.

>>(Considering the volatility of things these days, might need to dig that up and see if it works today)

We cannot have stabilization by wishful thinking. We must take positive action to maintain the integrity of the American dollar.

>>(Gee..sounds familiar)

(5) A national service law- which, for the duration of the war, will prevent strikes, and, with certain appropriate exceptions, will make available for war production or for any other essential services every able-bodied adult in this Nation.

>>(Perhaps an idea that needs revisiting)

The Federal Government already has the basic power to draft capital and property of all kinds for war purposes on a basis of just compensation.

As you know, I have for three years hesitated to recommend a national service act. Today, however, I am convinced of its necessity. Although I believe that we and our allies can win the war without such a measure, I am certain that nothing less than total mobilization of all our resources of manpower and capital will guarantee an earlier victory, and reduce the toll of suffering and sorrow and blood.

>> (Oh…like placing the entire burden of fighting the past 10 years on volunteers and the National Guard. National Guard…the armed forces branch that is supposed to be used in national emergencies…or as the last resort to fill out the regular troops)

I have received a joint recommendation for this law from the heads of the War Department, the Navy Department, and the Maritime Commission. These are the men who bear responsibility for the procurement of the necessary arms and equipment, and for the successful prosecution of the war in the field. They say:

“When the very life of the Nation is in peril the responsibility for service is common to all men and women. In such a time there can be no discrimination between the men and women who are assigned by the Government to its defense at the battlefront and the men and women assigned to producing the vital materials essential to successful military operations. A prompt enactment of a National Service Law would be merely an expression of the universality of this responsibility.”

I believe the country will agree that those statements are the solemn truth.

National service is the most democratic way to wage a war. Like selective service for the armed forces, it rests on the obligation of each citizen to serve his Nation to his utmost where he is best qualified.

>>( Like today…require a 2 year national service between high school and college. Either a stint in an armed forces branch, Peace Corps or Americorp. Give people a sense of ownership of the country and that it requires work to keep it free and prosperous.)

It does not mean reduction in wages. It does not mean loss of retirement and seniority rights and benefits. It does not mean that any substantial numbers of war workers will be disturbed in their present jobs. Let these facts be wholly clear.

Experience in other democratic Nations at war—Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand- has shown that the very existence of national service makes unnecessary the widespread use of compulsory power. National service has proven to be a unifying moral force based on an equal and comprehensive legal obligation of all people in a Nation at war.

>>( I mean, look at England. Even the royalty has to perform national service. No one is exempt. )

These five measures together form a just and equitable whole. I would not recommend a national service law unless the other laws were passed to keep down the cost of living, to share equitably the burdens of taxation, to hold the stabilization line, and to prevent undue profits.

>>(Still not a bad idea to get things on an even keel so we can attend to things that REALLY need attending .)

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=16518

to be continued yet again…..

Page 3 of 5

Sidelined Buddah

25
May
11

FDR Speech…Part 2

Franklin D. Roosevelt: State of the Union Message to Congress – January 11, 1944

There are people who burrow through our Nation like unseeing moles, and attempt to spread the suspicion that if other Nations are encouraged to raise their standards of living, our own American standard of living must of necessity be depressed.

>>(Gee, even then we had people that believed in suppressing other nations’ prosperity. )

The fact is the very contrary. It has been shown time and again that if the standard of living of any country goes up, so does its purchasing power- and that such a rise encourages a better standard of living in neighboring countries with whom it trades. That is just plain common sense—and it is the kind of plain common sense that provided the basis for our discussions at Moscow, Cairo, and Teheran.

>>( Then, as now, common sense ain’t that common)

Returning from my journeyings, I must confess to a sense of “let-down” when I found many evidences of faulty perspective here in Washington. The faulty perspective consists in overemphasizing lesser problems and thereby underemphasizing the first and greatest problem.

>> ( A familiar problem…seemingly especially virulent in Republicans. And yes I’m referring to all the job creating bills that the House has put forwards since the 2010 election…or lack of them. )

The overwhelming majority of our people have met the demands of this war with magnificent courage and understanding. They have accepted inconveniences; they have accepted hardships; they have accepted tragic sacrifices. And they are ready and eager to make whatever further contributions are needed to win the war as quickly as possible- if only they are given the chance to know what is required of them.

>> ( Again familiar. The public is ready to do fantastic things…if only they knew what they were. Hello Mr. President…solid, firm, precise direction and policies needed here….no conceptual ideas…we need new bridges, roads, dams, power grid, energy sources…put it in a firm policy and stand behind it…like Mt. Everest.)

Such selfish agitation can be highly dangerous in wartime. It creates confusion. It damages morale. It hampers our national effort. It muddies the waters and therefore prolongs the war.

>> (Then as now. The more things change……)

If we analyze American history impartially, we cannot escape the fact that in our past we have not always forgotten individual and selfish and partisan interests in time of war—we have not always been united in purpose and direction. We cannot overlook the serious dissensions and the lack of unity in our war of the Revolution, in our War of 1812, or in our War Between the States, when the survival of the Union itself was at stake.

In the first World War we came closer to national unity than in any previous war. But that war lasted only a year and a half, and increasing signs of disunity began to appear during the final months of the conflict. In this war, we have been compelled to learn how interdependent upon each other are all groups and sections of the population of America.

>>( As we still are…and have always been. )

And I hope you will remember that all of us in this Government represent the fixed income group just as much as we represent business owners, workers, and farmers. This group of fixed income people includes: teachers, clergy, policemen, firemen, widows and minors on fixed incomes, wives and dependents of our soldiers and sailors, and old-age pensioners. They and their families add up to one-quarter of our one hundred and thirty million people. They have few or no high pressure representatives at the Capitol. In a period of gross inflation they would be the worst sufferers.

>>(Ummm…Republicans…Tea Party…even Democrats…..re-read that paragraph often…daily if possible. How about engraving it on the entrance door to Congress? )

Those who are doing most of the complaining are not deliberately striving to sabotage the national war effort. They are laboring under the delusion that the time is past when we must make prodigious sacrifices- that the war is already won and we can begin to slacken off. But the dangerous folly of that point of view can be measured by the distance that separates our troops from their ultimate objectives in Berlin and Tokyo—and by the sum of all the perils that lie along the way.

Overconfidence and complacency are among our deadliest enemies. Last spring—after notable victories at Stalingrad and in Tunisia and against the U-boats on the high seas—overconfidence became so pronounced that war production fell off. In two months, June and July, 1943, more than a thousand airplanes that could have been made and should have been made were not made. Those who failed to make them were not on strike. They were merely saying, “The war’s in the bag- so let’s relax.” That attitude on the part of anyone—Government or management or labor—can lengthen this war. It can kill American boys.

>>(As Yogi Berra said, “It ain’t over ‘till it’s over . “ )

However, while the majority goes on about its great work without complaint, a noisy minority maintains an uproar of demands for special favors for special groups. There are pests who swarm through the lobbies of the Congress and the cocktail bars of Washington, representing these special groups as opposed to the basic interests of the Nation as a whole. They have come to look upon the war primarily as a chance to make profits for themselves at the expense of their neighbors- profits in money or in terms of political or social preferment.

>>(Sounds a lot like today. The more things change…..)

Increased food costs, for example, will bring new demands for wage increases from all war workers, which will in turn raise all prices of all things including those things which the farmers themselves have to buy. Increased wages or prices will each in turn produce the same results. They all have a particularly disastrous result on all fixed income groups.

>> ( or the ‘wage-price spiral’ so dreaded in the 70’s and 80’s)

If ever there was a time to subordinate individual or group selfishness to the national good, that time is now. Disunity at home—bickerings, self-seeking partisanship, stoppages of work, inflation, business as usual, politics as usual, luxury as usual these are the influences which can undermine the morale of the brave men ready to die at the front for us here.

>>(And this from a president that has only been in a war for a little over 2 years…what about the 10 years we’ve been at war? )

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=16518

Page 2 of 5 To be continued….

Sidelined Buddah

21
May
11

FDR’s 1/11/44 State of the Union Address…with inserted comments… Part 1

The American Presidency Project John T. Woolley &
Gerhard Peters • Santa Barbara,
California

• Franklin D. Roosevelt State of the Union Message to Congress
January 11,1944

To the
Congress:

This Nation in the past two years has become an active partner in the world’s greatest war against human slavery.

>>(In our case, it’s been 10 years and it might be defined as ‘ war against the slavery of terror’. )

We have joined with like-minded people in order to defend ourselves in a world that has been gravely threatened with gangster rule.

>>(Terrorists, gangsters…same style of running things, rule by fear. )

But I do not think that any of us Americans can be content with mere survival. Sacrifices that we and our allies are making impose upon us all a sacred obligation to see to it that out of this war we and our children will gain something better than
mere survival.

We are united in determination that this war shall not be followed by another interim which leads to new disasters that we shall not repeat the tragic errors of ostrich isolationism—that we shall not repeat the excesses of the wild twenties when this Nation went for a joy ride on a roller coaster which ended in a tragic crash.

>>(Well,we seem to have failed greatly on this last point…..)

When Mr. Hull went to Moscow in October, and when I went to Cairo and Teheran in November, we knew that we were in agreement with our allies in our common determination to fight and win this war. But there were many vital questions
concerning the future peace, and they were discussed in an atmosphere of complete candor and harmony.

In the last war such discussions, such meetings, did not even begin until the shooting had stopped and the delegates began to assemble at the peace table. There had been no previous opportunities for man-to-man discussions which lead to meetings of
minds. The result was a peace which was not a peace. That was a mistake which we are not repeating in this war.

And right here I want to address a word or two to some suspicious souls who are fearful that Mr. Hull or I have made “commitments” for the future which might pledge this Nation to secret treaties, or to enacting the role of Santa Claus.

To such suspicious souls—using a polite terminology—I wish to say that Mr. Churchill, and Marshal Stalin, and Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek are all thoroughly conversant with the provisions of our Constitution. And so is Mr. Hull. And so am I.

Of course we made some commitments. We most certainly committed ourselves to very large and very specific military plans which require the use of all Allied forces to bring about the defeat of our enemies at the earliest possible time.

But there were no secret treaties or political or financial commitments.

>>(Yep,even back then transparency seems to be a great concern of people…)

The one supreme objective for the future, which we discussed for each Nation individually, and for all the United Nations, can be summed up in one word: Security.

>>( Seems a concern that never seems settled.)

And that means not only physical security which provides safety from attacks by aggressors. It means also economic security, social security, moral security—in a family of Nations.

>>(Ah,something that is a tad different from what the Republicans and others seem to see as security. Perhaps things need to be restated? )

All our allies have learned by bitter experience that real development will not be possible if they are to be diverted from their purpose by repeated wars—or even threats of war.

>>(Well…it seems our allies…and some ‘enemies’ have learned this, but we seem to be missing this point consistently.)

China and Russia are truly united with Britain and America in recognition of this essential fact:

The best interests of each Nation, large and small, demand that all freedom-loving Nations shall join together in a just and durable system of peace. In the present world situation, evidenced by the actions of Germany, Italy, and Japan, unquestioned military control over disturbers of the peace is as necessary among Nations as it is among citizens in a community. And an equally basic essential to peace is a decent standard of living for all individual men and women and children in all Nations. Freedom from fear is eternally linked with freedom from want.

>>(Perhaps the message hasn’t gotten to some in the U.S. ? Right now we have both fear and want. What happened in the past 70 years that blinded us from this basic thought? Are we THAT greedy of a society that we can’t allow ‘a decent standard of living for all individual men and women and children’? )

…..to be continued
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=16518

Page 1 of 5

Sidelined Buddah

21
May
11

FDR’s Second ‘Bill of Rights’…….Intro

This is something that’s always interested me since I first saw the film clip of FDR reading it. The ‘rights’ put forth in it are what is under discussion now and apparently were incorporated into the Constitutions of Germany and Japan after WWII. Included are a few links to get things started.

http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/archives/stateoftheunion.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EZ5bx9AyI4&feature=related

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=16518#axzz1N0HxuaPA

Hmmm…after reading that speech, perhaps that should be my starting point. There are several points FDR made in that speech that still continure to resonate in today’s current conditions. Seems like he was a wiser president than most know….

Sidelined Buddah

21
May
11

If the Last 10 years were different….

…I might be agreeing with the Republicans and Tea Party about not taxing the wealthy…but it ain’t. We’ve tried it their way for the last 10 years and not only did the wealthy NOT create more jobs, we actually LOST jobs. D’oh! If that’s the result, let’s see if the opposite occurs when the wealthy get a tax INCREASE. They got their chance…and their idea flopped.

Seriously tho, it really comes down to what drives this nation’s economy….and it’s consumer spending. If we, the 90%, aren’t spending, this economy does what it’s doing now…floundering. We don’t manufacture enough things anymore to export our way out of this…we outsourced most of our manufacturing so that we import most of our consumer goods now.

Consumers only spend when they feel things are going well enough so that they feel secure in their jobs and expect things to be going well enough so they expect their incomes to be increasing….that ain’t happening now. Without the consumers demanding more goods and services, business don’t want to increase their costs by hiring more workers that they don’t need in order to produce goods ans services that they aren’t selling.

Businesses only exist to make profits. They don’t exist to employ people that would not increase their profits. The ONLY reason business has to hire more people and create more jobs is because they need them in order to meet the increase in demand that their current workforce can’t meet…or the overtime needed is more than an additional worker would cost.

So…now businesses aren’t expanding and increasing their demands for goods and services…and they still need to satisfy the stockholder demands for profits…so they look to cut costs…and usually the largest cost are employees. Guess what gets cut first?

Ok…now we have a situation where the consumers are not able to increase their demands for goods ans services because they aren’t confident enough and/or can’t because of becoming unemployed or are afraid of becoming unemployed, and businesses won’t increase employment and create new jobs because the increased demands from both consumers and other businesses isn’t there. What does that leave us that might be able to increase demand for goods and services enough to make it worth it for businesses to hire more?  The Government.

Yep, the ONLY force left to move the economy is the government.  Yes I’ve heard the cries that the government spends too much, and yes I agree, it does and it needs a close examination to streamline things and find economies…and yes I’ve heard the cries that this deficit is too large and will bankrupt us, and yes, I agree it needs to come down….but not now. Not when this country is slowing down.

There are things that need to be done in this country that would not only put people to work, but make it more efficient for business to work. There needs to be a gigantic public works effort to fix our infrastructure and get the nation up to speed with our competition. Roads need improvement, bridges need repair or replacement, the electrical grid needs updating, our internet..even broadband is one of the slowest of developed nations. We need alternatives to fossil fuels. We need true high-speed rail, not the 100 mph efforts, but the 175-250 mph that other nations are building.

We need to get schools into the 21st century.

When did we become a nation that accepts mediocrity as the best we can do?

We need government to spend…no INVEST in upgrading our infrastructure. We also need a true effort at bringing government into to 21st century…our ENTIRE system…from the smallest village to Capitol Hill…it needs a good examination and makeover.

It’s a good system…not great, but good. It’s old tho….based on 18th century situations and thinking. Many of the laws on the books need to be examined and either updated to present needs or sunsetted if they make no sense now. Departments need to be examined and restructured if needed. Departments like the FAA and FCC need to have their purposes redefined and have their rule making and enforcement powers slit from their industry promotion agendas. No agency can properly do both in this era.

..but I’m rambling now  ; )

more later…..Sidelined Buddah

19
May
11

We’ll never contain healthcare costs the way we’re going….

Think about it. Insurance companies, drug companies, many hospitals, all hmo, ppos, doctors are all in it to make money…the more the better. Especially the publicly held companies. They need to show stockholders profits constantly. There is ONLY one way to get this entire mess under control and that’s single payer healthcare….or, “Medicare for all”.

In my mind, Medicare for all is a modified Medicare plan. It raises the amount it pays to 85% instead of 80%, it covers everything; vision, dental and mental, and provides bonuses to doctors for keeping their patients healthy. Current health insurers will be able to cover the other 15% and procedures that would be electives. Of course the current Medicare tax would need to be raised slightly, my best guess might be to 2.5% from 1.45% for employed and 4% from 2.9% for self-employed. Medicaid would still be provided for those that cannot afford the 15%.

It would fold in Part D and close the ‘doughnut hole‘ for drug coverage…and malpractice law will need to be re-examined and probably need caps on certain areas.

With everyone and everything covered by Medicare…and adding in the VA and Military…the Government would be able to put the brakes on the massive leaps in costs and provide a more reasonable increase, more in line with inflation than profit needs. It would allow bulk buys of drugs and equipment. Of course all state, county and city medical providers would be able to join in buying through the Medicare system and get the discounts as well.

If costs weren’t running wild, if companies weren’t so greedy, this proposal wouldn’t even be needed…but it is. It covers everyone and everything…should be set up to encourage preventive medicine, and provide areas with little or no providers with them.

But it makes too much sense….

Sidelined Buddah

18
May
11

How to save Social Security in one move….

….drop the tax cap. Most people don’t realize that any income over $106,800 is not taxed by social security. You got it…the rich guy that pulls in $15 million a year only put in about $4,500 in social security taxes on that income….$142,044 if self-employed. If the cap was lifted, that same person would put in $630,000….$1,995,000 if self-employed. Why should a person making that much money pay less of a percentage of their income in social security taxes than a grocery bagger at Jewel?

And why aren’t the Democrats talking about it? Or the news? It’s not that hard to find out…just google ‘social security tax rate’.

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/240/~/2011-social-security-tax-rate-and-maximum-taxable-earnings

I did.

Sidelined Buddah




Calender: Click on Date to see that day’s post(s)

May 2024
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 932 other subscribers

Follow me on Twitter

Member of The Internet Defense League