Okay let’s get something straight right off the top. A national government’s budget has NO resemblance to either a family OR business budget. PERIOD. Yes, state, city, and county government budgets might be comparable, but NOT the federal. For several reasons.
First, the federal government can print money. It’s the ONLY organization that can.
Second, it’s the buyer of last resort. When the economy fails to create enough demand to get the nation out of a recession or depression, it’s up to the federal government to create that demand. In other words, if people cannot purchase enough goods to create the conditions needed for business to hire more employees, the government not only has the resources, but the implied duty to create the demand needed by federal projects.
Third, the conditions that are needed for the federal government to have a balanced budget is NOT dependent on cash flow like families, businesses, and lower governments, IT’S DEPENDANT ON FULL EMPLOYMENT (about 3%). If there is NOT full employment, the federal government not only should, but has an implied duty to run a deficit until full employment is attained.
I did say implied. Where? In the preamble to the Constitution:
Related articles
- Balanced budget laws a double-edged sword (metronews.ca)
- Bloated Government? Federal Employment at 47-Year Low (economix.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Budget Battles Highlight Importance of Federalism (cato.org)
1 Response to “About Federal Budgets…”